Provided COVAXIN single dose efficacy is >70%, models support delaying COVAXIN 2nd dose except for 65 years +
We should have had quality Ph3 data and real world data on COVAXIN by now. Unbelievable that we’re still doing guess work.
🧵
1/
Modeling study helps us understand lives saved with delayed second dose of Covaxin.

Assuming vaccination rate of 0.3% of population / day. The total cumulative mortality on day 180 is seen to be lower as below depending on efficacy. Makes sense if efficacy >70%
2/
Delayed second dose except for 65+ allows us to save lives but reduces the risk due to uncertain efficacy. Bottom line if COVAXIN single dose efficacy is >70% this approach makes sense given India’s daily vaccination rate. We’re unlikely to ever hit 1% population / day
3/
Under specific conditions a decrease in cumulative mortality, infections, & hospitalization can be achieved when 2nd dose is delayed. Most significant when the 2nd dose delayed in <65 years, with 2nd dose prioritized in time for >65.
bmj.com/content/373/bm…

4/
“The conditions in which these benefits were observed included the first dose vaccine efficacy being above 70% and vaccination rates remaining below 1% of the population per day.”

Bharat Biotech & ICMR have (hopefully) Ph3 and real world data for single dose efficacy

5/
Delayed second dose except for 65+ with COVAXIN will allow for benefit of saving more lives while reducing risk by ensuring timely dosing for the high risk group (65+).
In parallel we can study the benefit in the 45-65 age group of delayed dosing on lives saved.

6/
This is not an ideal option. This is a Hail Mary because we’re in a catastrophic and largely avoidable vaccine shortage scenario. This is crisis time plan to save lives. It is not with out risk. Prioritizing 65+ for 2nd COVAXIN dose on time takes away a lot of the risk.

7/
Earlier many, including myself, incorrectly believed that such delays might result in increased risk of immune escape variants. This was likely incorrect, and it’s probable that single dosing may actually reduce the risk of immune escape variants.

8/
We need to administer as many first doses as possible ASAP. We should delay the second dose of COVAXIN to 12 weeks for all below 65 years. We should study lives saved in parallel. It should never have come to this. It’s an abysmal failure that we’re here but we’re here.

9/

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Dr. Swapneil Parikh

Dr. Swapneil Parikh Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @swapneilparikh

12 May
Here’s a plan to get India 10-20% extra COVISHIELD vaccines doses overnight!

How could this be possible? Read on to find out.

🧵 1/

Antibody Responses After a Single Dose of ChAdOx1 nCoV-19 Vaccine in HCWs Previously Infected with SARS-CoV-2 medrxiv.org/content/10.110…
A study found that HCWs who had recovered from COVID-19 up-to 11 months prior responded incredibly to a single dose of AstraZeneca vaccine (COVISHIELD).
They had neutralizing antibodies against wild type virus but also neutralized P.1 & B.1.351 (immune escape variants)!
2/
In fact those who had COVID-19 in the past and took a single dose of AZ (COVISHIELD) had higher neutralizing antibodies than those who took 2 doses of Pfizer mRNA vaccine! That’s right - past infection plus 1 dose AZ higher nAbs than 2 doses of Pfizer!
3/

medrxiv.org/content/10.110…
Read 14 tweets
30 Jan
If we have to wait till June for COVOVAX, Indian regulators should hang their heads in shame.
They gave COVAXIN an EUA without any efficacy data or Ph3. Novavax has efficacy data from Ph3 in U.K. and Ph2 in SA. Ph3 in USA and Mexico underway. 1/
Indian regulators literally rewrote the rules for COVAXIN citing hypothetical superior efficacy against variants. What a load of BS (BOGUS science). They made up the restricted EUA in clinical trial mode BS. But a vaccine with 85%+ efficacy in Ph3 against B.1.1.7 is too risky! 2/
Is COVISHIELD good? Yes. But there’s a lack of data for >55 years. That’s more an issue with the trial than the vaccine. Is COVAXIN good? I don’t know, no publicly available Ph3 data. COVOVAX has AMAZING immunogenicity & reported AMAZING efficacy (need 2 wait for the preprint) 3/
Read 4 tweets
29 Jan
Let me just try to preempt all the BS (bad science) we will hear about hypothetical superiority of COVAXIN against variants vs Novavax. A thread 🧵 1/
Novavax is proven efficacious against OG COVID-19 and B.1.1.7 in a Phase 3 clinical trial in U.K. We should soon have the data in a preprint / peer reviewed publication. The confidence in the results will increase as more cases occur. 2/
Novavax has a Phase 2 trial in South Africa with an efficacy endpoint. That trial reported efficacy albeit reduced against B.1.351. The number of participants in the study was small, number of cases were low and therefore confidence in these results in lower than we need. 3/
Read 14 tweets
30 Jul 20
Mumbai’s sero-prevelance study - detailed report with technical details : tcs.tifr.res.in/~sandeepj/avai… @CT_Bergstrom @mlipsitch @cmyeaton @nataliexdean @apoorva_nyc @velumania 1/
2/Study period: 14 days in July 20.
Areas selected:Three wards (R-North, M-West and F-North) in Mumbai were chosen based on: (a) City and Suburban areas (b) East, West and North areas and (c) representative of areas with low to high prevalence based on reported cases on 02/06/20
3/Sampling design: Sampling from households in impoverished tenements or buildings, which were separated by at least 3 households/buildings ensured geographically separate and a systematic method for non-overlapping area coverage.
Read 14 tweets
17 Jun 20
Those of us following #RECOVERYtrial know it’s one of the most important clinical trials for COVID-19, not just for its potential to identify new therapeutic options but also to temper the excitement over unproven therapies. 1/
My thoughts on the RECOVERY trial PRESS release on mortality benefit for COVID-19 with dexamethasone.
RECOVERY trial is a large randomized controlled trial with multiple arms. 11k+ patients and multiple treatments being evaluated. See image for therapeutics under evaluation. 2/
First, what is dexamethasone?
Dexamethasone is a corticosteroid, commonly called a steroid (not the anabolic kind). In addition to many other effects, it can reduce the inflammatory resonse caused by an out of control immune system. 3/
Read 16 tweets
13 Jun 20
@ShamikaRavi We explored the possible effect of the monsoons on transmission SARS-CoV-2 in #TheCoronavirusBook. Influenza does activity does spike in the monsoon and post monsoon period in tropical countries. 1/
@ShamikaRavi Possible reasons: clustering of people indoors with increased social contact, high RH + precipitation and decreased solar radiation can prolong viron stability, lower vitamin D levels may play a role. 2/
@ShamikaRavi Let’s look at how influenza’s transmission changes with weather. First let’s distinguish between transmission patterns in temperate countries and tropical countries.
3/
Read 17 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Too expensive? Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal Become our Patreon

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us on Twitter!

:(