1/ Vitalik recently created a proposal on the Uniswap governance forum that they should shift focus and create a human-based token-weighted voting oracle mechanism to provide algorithmic stablecoins with USD-paired price data

Here's why I think this is not a practical proposal
2/ What is suggested is that Uniswap copy the Augur/UMA model where $UNI token holders are asked what the price of an asset is against USD, it is voted upon, and then multi-day/week dispute rounds are initiated as needed that can ultimately result in a token fork
3/ To note, this proposed oracle mechanism has nothing to do with Uniswap's existing on-chain TWAP oracle that I explored in this blog post below

It uses a fundamentally different oracle model, so the points being made here are different
smartcontentpublication.medium.com/twap-oracles-v…
4/ The primary issue I see is that a token-weighted human voting-based oracle mechanism is simply not suitable for providing algorithmic stablecoins the price data they require due to the extreme latency of disputes periods which can take days to weeks and beyond to resolve
5/ Collateralized stablecoins like $DAI $RAI need to be able to liquidate undercollateralized positions within a timely manner for the protocol to stay solvent, otherwise, the peg of the stablecoin can break when collateral is less than the debt/stablecoins minted
6/ Imagine a flash crash where the price of a collateral asset drastically falls during a period of Ethereum network congestion. Will $UNI holders be incentivized to put the price on-chain in a timely manner when gas fees are 1000+ gwei? Time delays lead to user funds being lost
7/ A dedicated oracle network consisting of nodes whose sole aim is to provide reliable data are highly incentivized to post data during these conditions as their revenue depends on their performance and the value of the native token on the performance of the network as a whole.
8/ Vitalik's counterpoint was "a stablecoin that depends on timeliness for its security is not stable at all"

The reality is that all existing decentralized stablecoins with liquidity rely on timely and accurate price oracle updates, we can't look at this proposal in a vacuum
9/ Building an oracle solution that doesn't meet the specifications of what protocols needs today and that is only suitable for theoretical stablecoin models seems like prioritizing idealism over pragmatism, resulting in little benefits to users, developers, and token holders
10/ Ultimately what it comes down to, creating a new oracle system requires a lot of resources for research, development, monitoring, and support, which would siphon resources away from the development of the Uniswap DEX

A monumental undertaking with little benefit for end-users
11/ Vitalik notes "Chainlink is really valuable for many oracle use cases, but it is also a complex system with many features. Incentives are not as clean as they are in eg Augur....there is not an automated mechanism by which participants who provide wrong answers get penalized"
12/ Chainlink is a framework for building decentralized oracle networks that aim to achieve maximum tamper-resistance, you choose the features you need in your deployment

As a parallel, Ethereum is also a complex system, but that doesn't mean it's not suitable for DeFi
13/ In regards to cryptoeconomic security, Chainlink is secured today using the incentives of a native token

Because each Chainlink node holds and is paid in $LINK (from both user fees and subsidy), there is a strong economic incentive for nodes to uphold the value of LINK
14/ We see this same dynamic today in both the Bitcoin and Ethereum networks

Ethereum miners are paid in $ETH and they operate the protocol faithfully because a corrupted network would result in the devaluation of $ETH due to the destroyed trust/reputation of the network
15/ A successful collusion attack on a Chainlink Price Feed that results in tens of billions of dollars in the DeFi ecosystem being stolen would completely destroy any trust in the network and lead to a major devaluation of $LINK as the value proposition is now gone
16/ This economic principle of native token incentives is why networks like Bitcoin, Ethereum, and Chainlink continue to operate as designed using an honest majority assumption

The assumption is backed by economic incentives and penalties based on the value of that token
17/ In addition, the recent Chainlink 2.0 Whitepaper introduced Explicit Staking, a mechanism that achieves a super-linear staking impact where the cost of attack is quadratically greater in the number of nodes than the sum of deposited stake
research.chain.link/whitepaper-v2.…
18/ This leverages a two-tier oracle network model with a low-cost optimistic first tier and a maximum security second-tier consisting of the most reputable, performant, and profitable Chainlink nodes who have the greatest financial exposure to $LINK
19/ The first-tier explicitly stakes $LINK while the second-tier resolves disputes with slashing as they have the strongest economic incentive to faithfully resolve disputes to uphold the value of their $LINK holdings, future revenue (also denominated in LINK), and reputation
20/ There is much more nuance to this, including the use of cryptographic proofs, so I would recommend reading section 9 of the Chainlink whitepaper to get the full context on Explicit Staking if curious
21/ The summary here is that the Chainlink Network has been designed from day one to achieve the maximum level of tamper-resistance for high-value smart contracts by leveraging cryptoeconomic incentives and penalties in order to raise the cost of attack as high as possible
22/ In my opinion, the best equilibrium, where development resources are not wasted, is to use Chainlink as an oracle and Uniswap as a DEX

Due to Chainlink's existing economies of scale, users are already provided the highest quality oracle infrastructure at the lowest cost
23/ Given the current landscape and future evolution of both the oracle ecosystem and the DeFi economy, this proposal just doesn't seem practical to me

The Chainlink Network and its cryptoeconomic security will continue to evolve alongside the growing smart contract economy

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with ChainLinkGod.eth 2.0

ChainLinkGod.eth 2.0 Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @ChainLinkGod

13 May
Today in #Chainlink 🔗

"Because market data is fetched from off-chain, on-chain flash loans have zero effect on the data provided by the ETH/USD @Chainlink Price Feed, entirely solving the issues presented in the theoretical examples above" -@orbs_network
orbs.com/orbs-integrate…
"@SataToken is building risk analysis systems off-chain for service providers, who will then in turn report dynamic risk levels of identities on-chain using #Chainlink-powered decentralized oracle networks"

Decentralized identity is the future
$SATA $LINK
blog.congruentlabs.co/signata-will-l…
"We are excited to announce that @RulerProtocol is now using #Chainlink Price Feeds live on mainnet to secure user funds within our no-liquidation lending platform"

Interesting approach to lending/borrowing, impossible to get liquidated 🤔
$RULER $LINK
rulerprotocol.medium.com/ruler-protocol…
Read 6 tweets
13 May
Bitcoin's energy consumption is a feature, not a bug

Sounds like a meme but it's true, the security of PoW blockchains comes from distributed energy consumption

The more energy consumed, the more secure the network

Doesn't justify the energy usage, but it's context
That being said, Proof of Stake is a real viable alternative that isn't just theoretical

Ethereum is ditching PoW and switching to PoS within a year using the exisiting beacon chain

Even if you disagree, the "Bitcoin/PoW is wasteful" narrative isn't going away
The common argument I see against PoS is "the rich just get richer" but we see this same dynamic with PoW and mining farms

Infact, because of the economies of scale, it's more concentrated

Having more capital allows you to earn more captial, that is universally true
Read 7 tweets
12 May
Today in #Chainlink 🔗

"@VenusProtocol, a money market and synthetic stablecoin protocol built on #BinanceSmartChain (BSC), has now fully upgraded to @chainlink as its oracle solution"

$BAND's largest user just switched to $LINK 👀

$13.78B TVL secured
blog.venus.io/venus-upgrades…
“Not only are we able to leverage #Chainlink’s time-tested security, but its native operation on #BSC allows us to get consistently fresh data for a much lower price.” — Joelito Lizarondo @JLSwipe, Founder Venus Protocol and CEO of Swipe Wallet.

This kills the BAND narrative
"We are pleased to announce that @polywhalefi, the first yield farming platform on the @0xPolygon network, has integrated #Chainlink's Verifiable Random Function (VRF) on mainnet to secure the Polywhale Lottery system"

$KRILL $MATIC $LINK
medium.com/polywhale/poly…
Read 6 tweets
12 May
For some reason, the creators of the dog tokens TikTok normies are going wild over thought it was a good idea to put liquidity on Uniswap and give the LP tokens to Vitalik so he has half the supply

He just withdrew all the $SHIBA $AKITA $SHIB $ELON and is dumping them on Uniswap
This alone is already incredibly based of Vitalik, but then he went and donated $500M of his $AKITA to @gitcoin, a quadratic funding grants program for open-source developers 🤯
etherscan.io/tx/0x2fb8b58f8…
I may disagree with Vitalik on the topic of price oracles, but I simply cannot ignore just how based this move really was

Vitalik dumped the doge tokens to save Ethereum gas prices

View it live below
etherscan.io/address/0xab58…
Read 10 tweets
12 May
Today in #Chainlink 🔗

"@AlchemixFi's integration, which already involves the mainnet use of the $DAI/USD @Chainlink Price Feed, will expand to include the use and support of Chainlink Price Feeds for $ALCX, $alBTC, $alUSD, and $alETH"

Self paying based
alchemixfi.medium.com/advancing-alch…
"By leveraging #Chainlink’s market-leading Random Number Generator (RNG) solution for smart contracts, users will have a truly random chance at obtaining higher rarity grade #NFTs when combining lower grade @playdapp_io Town NFTs"

VRF + NFT = FTW
medium.com/playdappgames/…
"@RampDefi is excited to announce our live integration of the market-leading #Chainlink Price Feeds on both the Ethereum and Binance Smart Chain (#BSC) mainnets"

Lending, borrowing, collateralizing, Chainlink powers it all
medium.com/rampdefi/chain…
Read 7 tweets
11 May
This meme has never been more relavant than with the $SHIB nonsense

Driven entirely by TikTok retail investors, some have generated an ROI of 400,000x (turning $17 to $6.5M)

However, given the liquidity profile, 99% of $SHIB holders will never realize any profits Image
There are aspects of the crypto economy I love like the democratization of finance through DeFi

However, the reality is that when you give people permissionless freedoms, they are free to do as they wish

Thus, we have these dog coins consuming a majority of Ethereum's bandwidth
This leads to exuberant fomo where users are paying $265 in gas fees to buy $40 of tokens

They need a 6.6x to just break even and a 13.2x if they want to break even after selling

Seems ridiculous but if you feel you have the chance of making 100,000x....
Read 5 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Too expensive? Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal Become our Patreon

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us on Twitter!

:(