Good morning. Three weeks to the day after the amazing scenes outside the Court of Appeal where 39 Subpostmaster convictions were quashed, we are at Southwark Crown Court for two more cases to be decided.
Thread follows. #PostOfficeScandal
Parmod Kalia and Teju Adedayo are hoping to get their convictions quashed. My live-tweeting summarises and describes what is happening, it is not verbatim unless it is in “diret quotes.”
PO barrister on her feet setting out the case:
Parmod Kalia pleaded guilty on 17 Dec 2001 Bromley to one charge of theft of £22k. He was sentenced to 6 months in prison.
Teju (Tara) Adedayo on 19 Jan 2006 pleaded guilty to 3 charges of false accounting to £52k with 10 further offences of false accounting...
… She received 50 weeks imprisonment suspended for 2 years.
The Post Office is not resisting their appeals.
On 11 Dec 2020 six people had their convictions quashed by this court but Parmod and Adedayo (P&A) were not referred at the time by the CCRC because of their...
… confessions. Further material was submitted to the CCRC and they were referred.
On 23 April the Court of Appeal distinguished between Horizon-related appeals which it said was an abuse of process and those which were not Horizon-related and did not allow those appeals...
In the letters that the PO wrote to this court and appellants and was not contesting these cases, we looked at the CCRC’s reasons, the papers available, the CoA judgment and the code for Crown Prosecutors. Having looked at them all and taken into account the confessions, we have
… concluded that Horizon was NOT central to their case and their confessions stand. BUT we now with reference to the Code for Prosecutors we do not believe it is in the public interest to resist the appeals. A prosecution is retrospectively not required in the public interest...
… we therefore offer no evidence in relation to these appellants.
Appellants QC says: we do not accept this analysis from the Post Office but it is immaterial in the circumstances we wish to say no more about it.
Judge: you do not have to apply to set aside your...
… your guilty pleas. We adopt the findings of the Court of Appeal.
These appellants join those whose appeals have not been contested, their sentences have been served and we hope they can put this behind them...
… and get on with their lives without the shadow of their convictions and we therefore allow the appeals.
Judge rises. It’s all over. Teju and Parmod leave the court first, both in tears. Neil Hudgell (their solicitor) whispers “Congrtulations!” as they walk out in silence...
… everyone is still standing. They follow the cleared appellants out.
The number of Subpostmasters whose convictions have been cleared rises to 47. I’m going outside to conduct some interviews and take some photos. The live tweeting ends here.
My reporting of this story...
… has been entirely funded by donations. These have powered the postofficetrial.com website which is now a public resource for journalists, historians, academics and lawyers interested in this story.
Thank you if you have contributed in any way. You have helped expose...
… an extraordinary miscarriage of justice. I appreciate the privilege of being able to continue reporting it.
It's #MentalHealthAwarenessWeek. Two years ago this week, whilst it was at the High Court spending tens of millions of pounds trying to deny Subpostmasters justice, the Post Office released a self-satisfied tweet announcing it had signed up to the #TimetoChange pledge to...
... support its employees mental health. This provoked a strong reaction from Subpostmasters who hold the Post Office responsible for completely trashing their mental health. It certainly got me thinking. I had never really focused on the mental health trauma suffered...
... by Subpostmasters before, so i started asking around to see if any Subpostmaster would be willing to let me tell their stories. Many did, including Nicki Arch who was prosecuted nearly 20 years ago and suffered a breakdown, Wendy Buffrey who had a complete...
For almost the complete duration of her tenure as Post Office Chief Executive, Paula Vennells and the Post Office board kept information about possible (many now either likely or certain) miscarriages of justice from MPs, campaigners and the courts. In 2015 she told...
... Parliament that the Post Offict had done an investigation and such miscarriages of justice had been surfaced. Also in 2015 the Post Office told Panorama remote access to its Horizon computer system was impossible, a direct untruth. The Post Office, through their...
... Director of Communications Mark Davies (former Spad to Jack Straw) put pressure on media outlets to drop the story. He was good at his job and very successful. Some editors didn't want to run the story, prolonging the agony for victims. Alice Perkins (wife of Jack Straw)...
Blog post containing calls for a police investigation from a Tory peer updated with this from a leading Subpostmasters’ barrister:
"The Post Office knew from not later than 2013 that its systems were unreliable and...
…. that the Horizon system had the propensity to cause shortfalls not apparent to a Post Office branch terminal operator and that accordingly its evidence to the court in many cases was incomplete and misleading...
… That being so, why did the Post Office adopt the policy of denial...? Who devised that policy of denial and who implemented it?
Holy Moly - Post Office are contacting 540 criminalised Subpostmasters and others whose convictions might be unsafe. Given it prosecuted 736 and 45 have already had their convictions overturned we’re now into slam dunk biggest potential miscarriage of justice ever.
The Post Office legal team in 2013/4 need to be looking at themselves, including Chris Aujard, Rodric Williams (still at the PO) and Jarnail Singh. The CK Sift Review produced clear evidence of a couple of dozen potentially unsafe prosecutions in 2014.
That information was kept SECRET from MPs and the Justice for Subpostmasters Alliance. As I said a couple of days back - had that information been given to MPs and campaigners, then hundreds more prosecuted Subpostmasters would at least...
The Post Office kept the Clarke Advice (which advised Gareth Jenkins should no longer be used to give evidence as to the efficacy of Horizon based on the fact he appeared not to have disclosed to the courts bugs he disclosed to Second Sight) secret from...
MPs, campaigners and the public.
The Clarke advice begat the Cartwright King Sift Review which uncovered the possibility that a couple of dozen prosecutions may be unsafe.
This too was kept from MPs, campaigners and the public.
Presumably...
… the reasons why this not disclosed, was because this was privileged information.
I am told there is no privilege in iniquity. Now I’m getting on shaky ground, but bear with...