✈️Since 2009, the number of foreign flights taken by people from the U.K has increased by 57% (29 million).
✈️ 75% of flights are taken by just 15% of people.
✈️There is no single act of consumption that has a greater impact on global warming emissions.

Aviation, A THREAD...
Now, before frequent flyer vegans assail my mentions, please be aware that a) demand elasticity for food is lower than for flights; and b) a *year's* consumption of cow's milk (200ml a day) produces around 80% of the CO2 of *one* return economy flight from London to Berlin.
It's great news that the Government has accepted the recommendation of @theCCCuk on including aviation emissions in its 2035 decarbonisation targets, but worrying that it makes no reference to demand management, which is essential to achieving this goal... gov.uk/government/new…
Not only does the Gov't have no plan to drastically reduce aviation emissions, it is potentially going to ignore the advice of @theCCCuk by considering a cut in air passenger duty for the most avoidable form of aviation - domestic flights... bbc.co.uk/news/uk-politi…
And this isn't my view, but that of the @CommonsPAC, which recently concluded that:

🌡️🌍 'Gov't lacks plan for achieving net zero greenhouse gas emissions'; and

🌡️🌍 has "not...engaged with the public on the...individual behaviour changes that achieving net zero will require"
You can read the Public Accounts Committee's Achieving Net Zero report here:
committees.parliament.uk/publications/4…

...and find media coverage here:
I'm not saying that we should abolish aviation, but I am saying that aviation produces massively-outsized emissions and that, if you wish to fly, the costs of decarbonising that choice should fall firmly with you, the consumer. Fair and reasonable.
Currently, there is no meaningful plan to reduce aviation emissions so, as a technologically 'hard to abate' sector, reduced demand will have to play a part in that process. Time for the Government to embed structural responsibility in our consumer choices with a carbon tax.

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Jon Burke FRSA

Jon Burke FRSA Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @jonburkeUK

14 May
Cressida Dick applying the judgement for which she has become renowned. Not only are many new modal filters completely open to emergency services, creating blue light priority zones, but, LTNs are proven to reduce crime. The Met should prescribe them. thetimes.co.uk/article/178753…
What kind of Commissioner of the Metropolis would claim - without evidence - that Low Traffic Neighbourhoods 'hinder response times' while ignoring their proven record at reducing crime? I'll let you make your own mind up.
Not only is there no evidence to support the Commissioner's claims regarding emergency response times, there is evidence to contrary. I'd add, London is *full* of bollards and obstructions jointly delivered by Councils and the Met for the purposes of 'hostile vehicle mitigation'.
Read 5 tweets
12 May
When people say LTNs are 'divisive', what they really mean is 'let's go back to the days when we could drive wherever they wanted without any push-back'. All LTNs do is highlight the unsustainability of doubling the number of cars on our roads to 40 million in 30 years.
It's strange the same people didn't think 40,000 premature deaths in the U.K from air pollution - to which cars make a disproportionate contribution - long before the new Low Traffic Neighbourhoods was 'divisive'. Why? Because the media wasn't interested in our concerns.
It's strange the same people didn't think the disproportionate impact of air pollution on working class and minority ethnic communities from air pollution - to which cars make a disproportionate contribution - long before the new LTNs was 'divisive'. imperial.ac.uk/news/163408/et…
Read 9 tweets
10 May
1/ Hedgerows are not only central to our sense of national identity, they're also of immense environmental value. Their loss, and potential for preservation and restoration, also tell the story of our unsustainable way of life and how we can step back from the brink.
2/ Since WWII, the U.K has lost half its hedgerows - a staggering 300,000 miles. Although rates of hedge destruction have been reduced since the high watermark of the 1980s, losses are still occurring due to removal and mismanagement, with huge environmental consequences.
3/ Not only do natural hedgerows reduce resource depletion by eliminating the need for wire and stakes sourced in unsustainable ways, they're also habitat for thousands of vulnerable species, which is why their removal is hastening the collapse of biodiversity.

Via @NBNTrust.
Read 20 tweets
15 Apr
1/ Here's a really good example of what some companies are getting right on sustainable product design; what they're getting wrong on sustainable product design; and why regulation is the - fundamental - missing piece of the excess consumption jigsaw. Image
2/ So, what do @clarksshoes get right? Elimination of petrochemical-based glues ✔️Efficient design of biodegradable upper, reducing material waste ✔️Minimal detailing, reducing embedded carbon from manufacturing ✔️Minimisation of dyes, reducing product's chemical footprint ✔️
3/ And what do @clarksshoes get wrong? Firstly, it's unclear what thread is used, but I suspect it's plastic-based, meaning that while the leather upper is biodegradable, the thread would need to be removed to avoid contamination. Switching to natural thread would remedy this.
Read 13 tweets
26 Mar
1/ There's a myth that home deliveries are the 'cause' of recent road congestion, so what are the facts?

Of the 360 billion miles driven on the U.K's roads in 2019:

🚗 77.2% cars/taxis
🛻 15.4% small vans
🚚 4.8% HGVs
🚲 1% bicycles
🏍️ 0.8% motorcycles
🚌 0.7% buses/coaches
2/ In my view, part of the reason for the propagation of this myth is to extend responsibility for road surface miles/injuries/emissions to a broader category of people, and therefore to delegitimise policy responses like LTNs. Data here: roadtraffic.dft.gov.uk/summary
3/ Home deliveries are, of course, environmentally problematic - especially from a waste system perspective - but there is reason to believe that they also help eliminate some car journeys. The potential for delivery decarbonisation is also much greater than for private cars.
Read 7 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Too expensive? Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal Become our Patreon

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us on Twitter!

:(