Notice not one of these outraged responses actually disputes Hamas was using the building. The idea here is that Hamas should be able to use media orgs as shields (the deal those orgs knowingly make with Hamas) without consequences.
Everyone knows the deal in Gaza. Hamas lets those news orgs operate as long as they only report things Hamas approves of and provides cover for them. Those orgs might feel that deal is worth it, but that doesn't mean those trying to stop terrorism should just accept it.
What is Israel allowed to target in response to thousands of indiscriminate rockets?
Can't target the terrorists bc they use humans as shields, can't use disinformation to separate them bc media also fooled, and can't target their buildings bc they share those w news orgs...
Can't target the terrorists bc they use humans as shields, can't use disinformation to separate them bc media also fooled, and can't target their buildings bc they share those w news orgs...
Watch this video of the owner of the building negotiating with Israeli officials regarding the timing for taking down the building. At the end, he confirms that no one is left inside:
https://twitter.com/imshin/status/1393582943696719886
P.s. the deal on how the western media reports/deals with Hamas in Gaza isn’t exactly a secret. It has been well documented by former AP editor @MattiFriedman, among others: theatlantic.com/international/… 
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
