@_whitneywebb
The Powers that Be know this research caused problems for them, so now the story about the "Spike Protein" has changed.

drugtargetreview.com/news/90224/gen…
Here are examples of the original story from back in 2020. The spike protein from the Corona virus is the protein the mRNA will present to our cells in its encoding. These are in both print and video versions.
I realize you've been through all this, but the gaslighting has begun.

news-medical.net/health/What-ar…
This is a more recent article stating that the actual spike protein from the Coronavirus itself is what is encoded in the mRNA injected with the "vaccines."

nyulangone.org/news/how-mrna-…
But since this would mean that, given the laboratory observations about how the SARS-COV-2 virus spike protein is a pathogen in its own right, causing LONG COVID, it is not no longer the spike formations on the virus that provide the protein.

sciencebasedmedicine.org/spike-proteins…
Since this means a DIFFERENT protein is being used, would that not make it more difficult, something like dealing with a COVID-19 "Variant," to produce immunity? I tried to walk a few of them into that conversation last night, but so far, no takers. This is their solution.
Another question is---How could so many people, in both medical sciences and in journalism, possibly get such a key fact wrong? Who told them the protein would come directly from the spikes on the virus?
I finally found it--FROM PFIZER:

pfizer.com/news/hot-topic…
mRNA, delivered to your body's cells by lipid nanoparticles, instructs the cells to generate the spike protein found on the surface of the novel coronavirus that initiates infection.1,2 Instructing cells to generate the spike protein spurs an immune response,
including generation of antibodies specific to the SARS-CoV-2 spike protein.

This proves that Pfizer used the actual spike protein found on the surface of the SARS-COV-2 virus to encode the synthetic mRNA.

Quod Erat Demonstrandum.
@threadreaderapp Please unroll for future use of thread.

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Guy Jordan

Guy Jordan Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @Farrier105

18 Apr
@aaronjmate What would it matter if Manafort gave Kilimnik "campaign data" whatever the hell that is? It isn't a national security secret, it is "campaign stuff." The campaign was Manafort's new assignment since he failed to move the Yanukovych in Ukraine toward EU and NATO, after using...
@aaronjmate ...his influence on behalf of the State Department and CIA to do so (in order to hold off FBI/DOJ investigations of his white collar crimes) which was his previous assignment. So, he talks about his new gig with Kilimnik, the important Ukrainian source for the Obama...
@aaronjmate ...Administration, whom Manafort introduced to the US Embassy personnel in Kiev which launched Kilimnik's work trading "information" with State Department and CIA personnel in the Embassy there. Manafort knows Kilimnik, so he talks shop with him. Manafort has no access...
Read 17 tweets
28 Jan
@philllosoraptor @JackPosobiec Actually, the do not have a good case against him since he did not perform any of the acts that the statute defines as violations. When investigating in the early stages, the agent has to match the elements of the crime to the conditional statements (IF-THEN-ELSE logic).
@philllosoraptor @JackPosobiec When reading the statute, 18 USC 241, we see that ONE of the following acts must be performed:
Injure OR
oppress OR
threaten OR
Intimidate any person in any State, Territory, Commonwealth, Possession, or District in the free exercise or enjoyment of any right or privilege
@philllosoraptor @JackPosobiec secured to him by the Constitution or laws of the United States, or because of his having so exercised the same; OR

If two or more persons go in disguise on the highway OR
Read 16 tweets
19 Jan
The real story of QAnon starts almost exactly one year before Q's first "drop" on 4 Chan. In late October 2016, Steve Pieczenik, former PSYCHOLOGICAL WARFARE EXPERT with the CIA and the State Department, put out a You Tube video in which he claimed...
...of having launched a "countercoup" against Hillary and Bill Clinton with the help of a secret group in intelligence and the military to prevent the Clintons from stealing the 2016 election. Pieczenik described how his group was allied with JULIAN ASSANGE to use the DNC...
..and Podesta emails to foil this plot by Bill and Hillary Clinton.

This story is a variant of two opposing stories in the saga of the 2016 election that dominated news and politics for the past 4 years--The QAnon story and the Trump-Russia-Wikileaks story...
Read 25 tweets
25 Dec 20
@franifio How did Putin get Trump nominated? Trump had to get nominated for Putin to get him elected. Your answer must include evidence, including documents, testimony, and other forms of evidence as defined in the Federal Code of Criminal Procedure, The Rules of Evidence.
@franifio I have the answer to how Trump got nominated, and the evidence, which is considerable. Putin had nothing to do with it.
@franifio Here we go---First, Hillary asked her friends in the media to "elevate" Trump as she wanted to run against him.

medium.com/@bjcampbell/th…

observer.com/2016/10/wikile…
Read 13 tweets
8 Nov 20
@RichHiggins_DC Total Votes by Position, GOP and Democrat

Congress: GOP Democrat Totals
257,487 182,632 440,119

President 257,005 275,293 532,298

Difference 482 -92,661 -92,179

Drill down:
@RichHiggins_DC The problem is there are votes just for President totaling 92,179 as opposed to the candidates for Member of Congress (MC). If the Democrat candidate for MC and the GOP for MC had split the difference, there wouldn't be an issue.
@RichHiggins_DC This reflects electronic votes or paper ballots with votes only for President, and not for MC. Those votes went to Biden. That is clear by the numbers. This needs explained. See, if votes went to the MC candidates in that quantity, that would cover it. These votes only...
Read 8 tweets
6 Nov 20
@MariaBartiromo The system used in Arizona's voting sounds a lot like the one we used in Venango County, Pennsylvania. If the ballot is good, and you removed your ballot stub, the votes are scanned in and the ballot is RETAINED by the machine.
This means you have an electronic tabulation of each individual vote, which is likely tagged by ballot number, mine was 15. You have controls like total votes by candidate, total votes for all candidates (hash totals) that can be matched by the darkened circles on the ballots.
The number of each ballot is also tagged to the voter's name, which means in a recount, your vote might no longer be secret, but anyone auditing the results could have the option of contacting voters directly to ask about ballot numbers and if they voted at all.
Read 5 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Too expensive? Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal Become our Patreon

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us on Twitter!

:(