As many of you know, I have the privilege to represent Carter, along w/a team of other lawyers, in his case against the govt & former govt officials. Although there are limits to what we can say publicly, there are some things we can share. /1
The case is still in its early stages even though we filed it in Nov 2020 because of the procedural rights given to the govt & former govt officials in federal court. This coming week, however, the defendants will be filing their responses to our Complaint. /2
The defense pleadings are likely to be Motions to Dismiss to try to get the case thrown out on (probably very) technical grounds, rather than the formal Answers to the Complaint. This procedural step is normal in federal civil litigation. /3
We are expecting this procedural move by the defendants & are fully prepared to respond to the arguments the defendants will make. We will be presenting our arguments in opposition in our publicly filed court papers. /4
Because of the nature & scope of the conduct by the govt & former govt officials regarding Carter, it is to be expected that there will be legal issues in his case that are novel or unusual & therefore may be presented to the court for resolution. /5
The rules of the federal court provide for the briefing of legal arguments to the court in a series of filings and normally with a hearing, so there will be no rulings on any arguments raised by the defendants for quite some time. Federal litigation is a marathon, not a sprint./6
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
I’ve done State security clearance cases for decades. I’ve never seen one that was unjustified based on the facts - foreign relatives or other contacts, foreign financial interests, etc. These restrictions allow people to get cleared who wouldn’t. /1 thehill.com/homenews/admin…
Now, I do only see the ones that people want to fight, so it could be that there are some that are insufficiently related to facts & people for whatever reason decide not to challenge them.
/2
The clearance guidelines permit foreign contacts & interests to be used as factors to deny or restrict clearance. History & data shows that those factors can be/have been vulnerabilities to security. Ethnicity by itself is an irrelevant factor, however. /3
An interesting phenomenon I’ve noticed about covid. I’ve been looking at WaPo graphic every day. It reflects that there is a significant drop in daily cases & daily deaths every Sunday. Is this a reporting issue or a psychological phenomenon or both? (Pics to follow.)
/1
“we as former contestants feel th need to speak out against the messaging that these choices communicated — either intentionally or unintentionally — by the contestant Kelly Donohue and, implicitly by association, the producers of “Jeopardy!””
Could you be any more obnoxious?
“Kelly responded to a clue with a term for the Roma that is considered a slur. The use of this term doesn’t necessarily indicate malice . . . . Current diversity style guides, however, suggest that it not be used.”
Well good for the style guides! Fucking word police. 🙄
Giuliani case: unless the govt knows *significantly* different facts from what is being & has been historically reported about Giuliani’s dealings in Ukraine, I see little to no facts to support probable cause for a FARA violation & therefore to execute a search warrant. /1
This case looks extremely suspect to me. FARA is a technical statute aimed at specific conduct. It is seldom prosecuted criminally. DOJ has been trying to expand it in recent years, (not just against political figures) as Is typical of agencies looking to self-expand. /2
WaPo’s article about it today, e.g., was tellingly devoid of facts that would actually constitute a violation of the statute. It reads like it was somehow illegal to try to investigate the Ukraine/Biden/Burisma/Yovanovitch issues, which it wasn’t, under FARA or otherwise. /3
Gotta disagree. This is on all of us for tolerating bullshit “offenses” like this to stay on the books & on the stupid Supreme Court for authorizing police to detain & arrest people for non-incarcerable offenses such as this.
Fucking Mickey Mouse charges are the result of over-criminalization because a bunch of “Karens” write our laws & those laws do little beyond empowering bad cops to abuse their powers.
Exhibit A: I once drove 100 miles round trip on I-95 for 6 months straight with totally dead tags & a busted tail-light. Never got pulled over. Take a wild guess why. 🙄
@lilyq1011 Exactly. Stop explaining your choices to people who don’t care about you. They are not entitled to it.
Also, stop answering questions that people should not be asking you. Just because someone thinks they want to know something doesn’t mean they get to.
@lilyq1011 Women especially have trouble with these ideas, which are really just setting healthy boundaries. It see it with young female lawyers & clients.
You don’t have to answer every question! You get to decide each time whether it’s in your interest to answer or not!