I'll try to interpret the *data* I've presented in this context:
The Indian approach cab be best characterized as opportunistic. It considers that certain things can be affected and certain things cannot. It attempts to maximize what can be leveraged. Let us explore:
Given the choice to develop N vaccine candidates (N can be few or many), certain invariants hold:
* Each of N takes 3 steps to approval.
* Each will take a minimum time to clear all 3.
* Addi resources or options will not speed this up ('9 women and a baby in 1 month..')
2/
Therefore during the discovery phase the govt chose to be an enabler. As Poonawalla's tweets in Apr-Dec 2020 showed, Govt facilitated their scaling up and encouraged them to sign big deals, and start production early.
3/
Back in Nov, realizing that Covaxin was likely to succeed (it cleared Ph 1/2 in early Dec) it lined up investments in @BharatBiotech expansion, and spend money on BSL-3 line upgradation at two PSUs (IIL and BIBCOL) and now Haffkine and Biotec Pune.
4/
The result is that 3 months post AZ1222 (Covisheild) Ph3, SII had produced over 200m doses, while Pfizer+Moderna combined had yet to get to that figure - they both reached 100m doses around 3mo and a few weeks after their respective Ph3 and EUA.
5/
Covaxin Ph3 (early Mar) aligned more closely with J&J (end Jan). Yet, J&J hit catastrophic production problems with all its ~80m production in US to date discarded. Its 24m production is all in Netherlands.
6/
Covaxin much outstripped J&J in production volume, and will exceed Moderna prodn rate by late summer.
The opportunistic element here is that given that regardless of input investment, only a few will succeed early.
7/
This is true regardless of whether one writes blank cheques (US) or not (India). Some will fail outright, some will take much longer to clear 3 steps. This isn't 'failure' - it's the nature of drug discovery.
8/
It is possible to construct a mathematical model of this (but I'd defer to legends like @agrawalmanindra and @stellensatz) that expresses this as mathematical construct: that given these constraints, what is the best point to put your money in to maximize production.
9/
However that's essentially what India did - supported each as necessary, then helped push production rate up as quickly from approval date as possible. Rampup-from-approval view would show Indian production scaled up faster than Pfizer, Moderna, JJ.
10/
To be fair there are scaling concerns for SII because 100-150m doses from a single plant is hard for anyone. They need the extra line and they've copped delays there. Covaxin on the other hand has multiple lines coming up - an early lesson from SII they learned.
11/11
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
Let us look at US data since they were at the forefront with Operation Warp Speed; all numbers here are backed by reference data.
This shows how much of total US order volume has so far been fulfilled:
2/
Observations: three of six OWS contracts have yielded 0 doses to date. The J&J contract has yielded 15m doses, all imported because entire US production has been discarded for QC reasons, and they have been written off as a source:
Recently various sources have pitched the Pfizer vaccine for India. This parlays the recent western ‘branding’ effort differentiating Pfizer, but it is known that this vaccine has some unique technical requirements.
This thread analyzes the Pfizer logistics in depth.
1/
Storage
The vaccine must be stored at -60 to -80C, i.e. ultra low temp (ULT), much colder than normal freezer (-20C) or fridge (2 to 8C). Such storage systems are costly but cost depends on capacity. These have alarm systems to notify of failure or temperature fluctuations.
2/
The Pfizer transport box shows ~5000 doses = 10L tray volume. It is packed with dry ice and can be transported for no more than 10 days unopened, 15 if dry ice recharged. Each pallet has IoT comm to notify Pfizer of problems: truckinginfo.com/10134508/vacci… bbc.com/news/technolog…
Great thread that takes apart WSJ's predictable opposition to the TRIPS waiver that would help expand COVID vaccine production. The @WSJ is stridently focused on avoiding any attempt to learn from history.
This thread covers their production effort, scaling and some other factors. Starting with SII:
1/
SII started out with 50-60 million doses/mth capacity. Apr 1 it announced efforts to scale up to 100m by May using internal resources, and requested Rs.3000cr funding to scale up. The bulk order came thru mid April, enabling further scale up and deliveries through May/June.
2/
A common mistake made is to extrapolate latest prices to all future orders. Prices are tied to capital costs of scaling up and order size. Early SII orders were Rs.200/dose + GST. The higher initial price Is due to setup and initial investment SII made, described later.
3/
Observations: 1. SII-AZ signed the Covishield licence prodn deal to enable COVAX supply, so $3/dose is baseline 2. SII supplied 50m doses at that price, another 100m doses at 66% of that price to Indian govt.
2/
The second deal significantly stressed SII, supplying so far below cost. Same vaccine made in EU goes for $4-6 (Rs.300-450) per dose. SII pays ~Rs.75 per dose as royalty to AZ. At Rs.150/dose it makes only Rs.75.
3/