Once again, shelf price and purchase price are not the same thing.
The supply chain needs to be paid.
Food imported at distance is more susceptible to oil price.
Food imported at distance is more susceptible to the competition of other markets.
Food competing with your domestic market weakens food security.
In a free market investors move their money from products that start making less money.
If there is less production and demand remains the same, prices can rise.
The reduction of tariffs should not be seen as a guaranteed cost benefit to the consumer.
Any cost benefit can result in structural changes which ensure this is short term, and actually worse for the consumer.
The free market is very good at keeping things cheap, but is very bad at stability and long term planning.
Which is fine if you're buy television sets, not so much if you're buying something essential to sustain your life.
Crops fail. Pandemics result in export bans.
Even something as simple as a storm in the English channel can damage lamb availability.
Any short term gains from tariff reduction must be weighed against sustainability.
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
There is a consistent noise of an over nostalgic trade relationship from people who know as much about our trade relationship in the 70s as they did about all those tariffs the EU puts on the poorest countries in the word. 🙄
UKATA is in no way, shape, or form, reciprocal tariff free trade.
Apart from anything else, trade deals are supposed to be long term. If you believe in the free market, you have to accept that buying and selling patterns are not fixed and market led.
And of course, this. Production can increase to meet demand.
BJ: Michael, I've just been looking over what you said in the referendum about Scotland, and I was wondering if you still believed it?
MG: Boris, I didn't believe it then! I thought we had an understanding. I thought everybody knew I'm the epitome of the deceitful amoral smug little shit.
With the exception of Chris Grayling, I'm the worst person to be anywhere near a government.
I'm a terrible human being.
BJ:OK, well I'm just reading here that the minister in charge said "Scotland should have the strongest devolved powers of any one earth".
So what they put in place should work in our favour, right?
People say the Brexiteers sovereignty arguments are going to be used against them, but it goes much deeper than that.
I don't think Johnson has a single senior minister who hasn't demonstrated themselves either a pathological liar over Brexit or a simpering sell out who will do anything to follow the party line.