There is a consistent noise of an over nostalgic trade relationship from people who know as much about our trade relationship in the 70s as they did about all those tariffs the EU puts on the poorest countries in the word. 🙄
UKATA is in no way, shape, or form, reciprocal tariff free trade.
There is special mention of the damage Australia might do to our meat industry and temporary measures in the first year.
Here is the import table for the UK.
And there is a commitment to arrange a permanent policy which will protect our meat producers.
Anyone else what to bring up our pre-EEC Australian trade agreement, or are we done now?
There is a tariff tribunal, which you don't need if it's tariff free trade.
Don't worry, Tom will be invited onto Jeremy Vine or Politics Live, or Newsnight, to discuss our prior trade relationship with Australia, because our system is so horribly broken.
And he'll still be a step up from Dan Hannan.
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
The EU are negotiating a deal with Australia at the moment too, so it looks like we're going to be in a great position to compare the deal the EU got for its farmers with the best the UK government could manage.
And it's important to note that we haven't seen if the deals we've rolled over are better or not.
Because the exact same deal rolled over, doesn't mean it's equal...
For example, if an EU deal with Mexico gave them quota access of 500 million tonnes of meat, that would be a tonne of meat per person in a 500 million person market.
Apart from anything else, trade deals are supposed to be long term. If you believe in the free market, you have to accept that buying and selling patterns are not fixed and market led.
And of course, this. Production can increase to meet demand.
Once again, shelf price and purchase price are not the same thing.
The supply chain needs to be paid.
Food imported at distance is more susceptible to oil price.
Food imported at distance is more susceptible to the competition of other markets.
Food competing with your domestic market weakens food security.
In a free market investors move their money from products that start making less money.
If there is less production and demand remains the same, prices can rise.
The reduction of tariffs should not be seen as a guaranteed cost benefit to the consumer.
Any cost benefit can result in structural changes which ensure this is short term, and actually worse for the consumer.
BJ: Michael, I've just been looking over what you said in the referendum about Scotland, and I was wondering if you still believed it?
MG: Boris, I didn't believe it then! I thought we had an understanding. I thought everybody knew I'm the epitome of the deceitful amoral smug little shit.
With the exception of Chris Grayling, I'm the worst person to be anywhere near a government.
I'm a terrible human being.
BJ:OK, well I'm just reading here that the minister in charge said "Scotland should have the strongest devolved powers of any one earth".
So what they put in place should work in our favour, right?