I had a personal epiphany of sorts last night wrt my drive this year toward COVID educ. & my recent frustration wrt CDC & masks.
A 🧵 w/ a few unsolicited reflections from my separate perspectives as an aerosol scientist, lay citizen, & father of young kids w/ health needs. (1/x)
In various recent conversations & interviews, I’ve been asked my take on the new mask recommendations. First, I always fervently point out that I am not a public health expert, and I specify angles from which I feel professionally qualified to speak. 2/
Inevitably, however, people ask about my personal choices. And on that question, I’ve been somewhat conflicted, because my opinions don’t always line up with some colleagues that I deeply respect. 3/
I worried a bit that I was hesitant to endorse the CDC recommendations out of some unnecessary principle or an unrealistic academic ivory-tower. But as I’ve reflected, I don’t think that’s it. For me, I’ve realized there are three separate angles from which I respond. 4/
FIRST, as an aerosol scientist, I’ve poured huge portions of my last year+ into learning about, teaching, and researching airborne aspects of COVID transmission & prevention. I even keep a pretty comprehensive resource of links. 5/
bit.ly/3fzmB16
I’ve done what I can to raise understanding of how COVID spreads & what to do. We’ve worked for months to get agencies like the CDC & WHO to reflect sufficient messaging to keep people safe. Finally, last week the CDC released some much-need guidance. 6/
But less than a week after those updates, the CDC updated recommendations on mask-wearing by vaxxed people. While I understand the push, I felt the vax rates were still insufficient & the messaging process of the new statements was poor. 7/
But even more, I felt the short time after the CDC *finally* got their messaging right (i.e. what to about near-field and room-level aerosol inhalation risks) simply let the floor drop out from under the scaffold of support we’d work so hard to build. 8/
SECOND, as a lay citizen, I was frustrated b/c I felt the CDC shifted responsibility quickly & unnecessarily back to us, w/o any warning or help. It took us all months to set our routines so that each trip outside didn’t require a litany of questions about safety protocol. 9/
Then, all of the sudden, with no time to think or process, the CDC dropped a bombshell whose shockwave rippled widely, forcing quick, uncomfortable decisions by individuals, organizations, and state/civic governments to accept the recommendations or not. 10/
I felt like the recommendation that fully vaxxed people could avoid masks gave cover to people who wanted to avoid masks anyway, shifted responsibility to those who were doing the right thing, introduced confusion, and laid the groundwork for interpersonal conflict. 11/
For reasons more comprehensive than I’ll list here, I also felt like the messaging didn’t sufficiently address the fact that still <50% of the US is fully vaxxed, that kids <12 will be unvaxxed for months, that immuno-compromised are at risk, and other factors. 12/
BUT, none of that explained my emotions about wanting to avoid the question about my personal choices until another perspective hit me.
THIRD, as a father of small children w/ health needs, I realized I just look at the world through eyes borne of different experiences. 13/
Any parent who has spent many (many) hundreds of hours waiting by the hospital bedside of a child sees family medical risk differently. I have a child with special medical needs, and this year we’ve taken COVID precautions very seriously. 14/
Each of my children are <12 yrs and will need to wait months before they will be able to receive a COVID vaccine & won’t be able to before school starts in the Fall. Most of my personal decisions on these subjects thus collapse back to how they will affect my children. 15/
I respect that serious COVID occurrences are very rare in young children & evidence that suggests vaxxed individuals are also very unlikely to be asymptomatic carriers. Various risks still remain, and I also have to filter that through our own family health needs. 16/
I was asked in a recent interview if I am a cautious person. I said yes; I believe in the science & I am careful with COVID. But more fundamentally, I am also driven by subconscious memories of weeks in ICUs. 17/
Yesterday AM, I sat in a school auditorium for a year-end event (doors open, distanced, #CO2 monitor in-hand!). Despite the school rules against it, many people went unmasked, and I felt the frustration of not knowing & that it shouldn’t be my responsibility to carry extra. 18/
When the CDC changed recommendations without laying out how it was all going to work, I felt even more burden to carry. We’ve all frequently felt during this last year that various things weren’t our responsibility, but we were forced out of necessity to shift & carry them. 19/
I defer scholarly perspective to colleagues exp’d on questions of public health policy. As an aerosol scientist, I felt the timing & messaging was poor. As a citizen, I was confused. But as a father, I was frustrated that the news unnecessarily shifted extra burden to me. 20/

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Dr. Alex Huffman

Dr. Alex Huffman Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @HuffmanLabDU

14 May
The more I ponder this CDC decision on masks, the more frustrated I am, that:
- the people doing all the right things are the ones confused
- there is no guidance for people with kids & immunocompromised family
- the vacuum of guidance will bring confusion & moments of conflict
Frustrated that:
- this will likely cause at least some local/nat'l surges
- decisions happened before enough people could be vaxxed
- this announcement seemed rushed, without preparation for the messaging complexities
- I feel somehow grungy b/c of it all
BUT ... as I emphasized several times already -- I am an aerosol scientist and *NOT* a public health expert. I appreciate & defer to the public health experts with training and experience here.

As a lay person, all I'm saying is I'm still a little confused & frustrated.
Read 4 tweets
13 May
I was happy to contribute to this nice @medpagetoday article by @adambrosio_ reporting on the recent #CDC brief explicitly acknowledging inhalation risk of COVID.

Short thread with some quotes, CDC links, reflections. (1/x)
medpagetoday.com/special-report…
2/ I told her that IMO: "One of the most important aspects of the recent CDC updates is that they finally remove the ambiguous, 'close-contact' terminology, which just confused the whole discussion".

That's because ...
cdc.gov/coronavirus/20…
3/ "'close-contact' refers to a distance between people -- and not a process of transmission"

"previous guidance was unclear, because it did not distinguish that inhalation can occur at both short and long distances."
Read 10 tweets
12 May
Lots of really good insight in this piece arguing that indoor mask mandates should be lifted as vaccinations increase in a community.

I especially appreciate the personal anecdotes & perspectives from @linseymarr & @j_g_allen.
By @cheyennehaslett.
abcnews.go.com/Politics/press…
"We should not undersell the vaccines. They offer excellent protection" said @linseymarr "I think we can really start thinking about ending mask mandates once everyone who wants to be vaccinated has had a chance to be fully vaccinated. And that should be in another month or two."
"The timeline on just how soon the CDC could loosen guidelines is unclear, since experts say masks indoors should stick around until every adult who wants the vaccine has had a chance to reach full vaccination. At the same time, over 116M Americans have already hit that mark."
Read 9 tweets
4 May
This story about air cleaners by @LaurenWeberHP & @By_CJewett is important b/c:
- COVID risk in schools is still real & kids <12 yrs won't be vaccinated even by fall
- many well-meaning schools are buying worthless, even harmful products
- millions of tax-payer $$ being wasted
“It’s a high cost for nothing” @marwa_zaatari said" The company has sued her & another air-quality consultant for criticizing their devices. Of the pending case, Zaatari said it is a David-versus-Goliath situation, but she will not be deterred from speaking on behalf of children.
Many products offer promises only supported by the manufacturer.
The investment in proper air-cleaning (ventilation, HEPA filtration, upper-room gUV) will provide health benefits against respiratory aerosol infection AND many other issues for a generation.
Read 4 tweets
3 May
An important piece on the dubious "air cleaning" products being sold to school districts & businesses. Via investigations by @LaurenWeberHP @By_CJewett.

It's important to stick to well-proven strategies like improved ventilation & HEPA filtration. (1/x)
khn.org/news/article/a…
2/ A link to the @CNN version of today's story by @LaurenWeberHP @By_CJewett, and a summary thread:
3/ An Op-Ed that @ChemDelphine, @marinavance, & I wrote to add awareness on imp. issues of cleaning air in schools & businesses.
All district constituents should work together to educate & advocate strongly for proven strategies.

coloradosun.com/2021/04/23/saf…
Read 5 tweets
27 Apr
Excellent new guide on healthy #school buildings. Should be mandatory reading & discussion by all #K12 school boards, districts, school leadership.

Short, easily readable, w/ practical recommendations & support - for COVID & well beyond.

Link: static1.squarespace.com/static/5ef3652… (1/🧵)
2/ Summarized interventions for airborne infectious disease prevention:
1⃣ Commission buildings and examine existing systems
2⃣ Ventilate with clean outdoor air
3⃣ Improve the building’s air cleaning efficiency through evidence-based air cleaning treatment such as filtration
3/ Interventions, cont'd:
4⃣ If the ability to upgrade ventilation and air cleaning is limited, use portable air cleaners with high efficiency particulate air (HEPA) filtration
5⃣ Consider other evidence-based air cleaning approaches in the context of existing strategies
Read 8 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Too expensive? Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal Become our Patreon

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us on Twitter!

:(