Plea alleges that portions of the First Information Report (FIR) is to initiate an inquiry intended to destabilise the Shiv Sena-Congress-NCP government in the State.
Sr Adv Rafiq Dada appears for the State. ASG SV Raju appears for #CBI .
Raju: My concern is they are seeking interpretation of an order which is passed by another DB of this court.
Court: What is the grievance? They are asking production of documents?
Dada submits that CBI has been going beyond the orders of this court for investigation against #AnilDeshmukh
They sought copy of the letter written by IPS officer Rashmi Shukla and other documents.
Dada: They even issued notice to the Chief Secretary asking him to come and record his statement. He said he cannot come because of the pandemic, but he still went this Saturday.
ASG Raju submits that the Section 6 issue of the Special Delhi Police Act was settled by the Supreme Court.
Raju: The CJ passed a particular order, and if the entire order is read, then there is no restriction on investigation which State is now claiming they cannot investigate
Raju: Court initiated an inquiry. This issue was live before the Court. The Court did not reject any of the issues.
Dada: The relief we are seeking is that the two paragraphs in their FIR mentioned in our prayers is beyond the jurisdiction of the DB order. Hence we are troubling the court.
Raju: Ordinarily CBI cannot investigate in the state without consent of the state. But an exception has been carved out by the Supreme Court and high Courts with their powers under Article 32 and 226.
Raju: The preliminary enquiry of this court is as per Lalita Kumari’s case and the CBI manual. If a cognizable offence is disclosed then police has to register an FIR.
There is no restriction on the preliminary enquiry and its type and the FIR to be registered.
#SupremeCourt to shortly hear plea by an undertrial prisoner from Uttarakhand stating that undertrials cannot be equated with convicts for the purpose of grant of parole to prevent over-crowding in jails amid the #COVID pandemic. Plea seeks parole in line with recent SC order
The petitioner stated that the decision of the State High Powered Committee (HPC) to deny the benefit of parole to undertrial prisoners charged with offences punishable with more than 7 years' imprisonment, would be violative of Article 21 of the Constitution.
Adv Rishi Malhotra: Supreme Court had directed to formed high powered committees so that decision can be taken to release prisoners owing to over crowding of jails. Recently CJI NV Ramana led bench asked HPC to issued orders to consider the undertrial cases afresh
Calcutta High Court to resume hearing today in the case relating to arrest of four @AITCofficial leaders, Firhad Hakim, Subrata Mukherjee, Madan Mitra and Sovan Chatterjee in Narada case.
Track this thread for live updates from the court.
Breaking: Narada matter to be heard by larger Bench, order Calcutt High Court
Court also order the TMC leaders be kept in house arrest instead of custody in jail in tune with recent judgment of Supreme Court in Gautam Navlakha case
#SupremeCourt vacation bench led by Justice Vineet Saran to hear @YSRCParty MP Krishnam Raju's challenge to the Andhra Pradesh HC order denying him interim bail. Raju contends he was tortured in custody by CID and face cases as he seeks to set aside the bail granted to @ysjagan
Andhra Pradesh has informed the Supreme Court that @RaghuRaju_MP had made consistent and deliberate attempts to incite disaffection towards the State government by creating wedge between various classes and groups of citizens #SupremeCourt @ysjagan
Vacation Court Bench led by Justice SJ Kathawalla of #BombayHighCourt to hear the application of Father Stan Swamy seeking bail on medical grounds in connection to the #ElgarParishadcase of 2018.