When a Michael Mauboussin essay like this drops, I sing the Hallelujah Chorus so loud my neighbors complain.

If you aren't reading this post soon what the hell will you be reading?

The value of a business is the sum of the value of existing and future customers. Bottoms up!
2/ "Customers, revenues, and costs are the core drivers in the CBCV model. It is essential to consider how they interact when assessing how various assumptions affect value. Specifically, there are trade-offs between the drivers."

The interaction of factors makes the game fun!
3/ "For example, a price increase grows cash flow but raises the churn rate. A price drop shrinks cash flow
but lowers the churn rate. A focus on new customer acquisition increases the number of customers but raises
acquisition costs."

Understanding the interaction is an art.
4/ "The key to sorting through these possibilities is to do sensitivity analysis and to run scenarios."

By running many experiments using data science a manager can develop a "feel" for the CBCV, which is a lot like flying an airplane. Both analog and digital clues are inputs.
5/ People who run a P&L are ~ micro economists and their lens is often the value of each of their customers. When I look at a business my source of variant perception is often CBCV. The bottoms up analysis not reconciling with a top down analysis can generate investable insight.
6/ An example of CBCV revealing investable insight is subscription SaaS, where the bottoms up analysis reveals top down GAAP accounting generates a broken model of value creation due to investments in intangibles and up front subscriber acquisition costs incurred by the business.
7/ What you are looking for often is a business with GAAP earnings not reflecting what John Malone calls "value creation and levered cash-flow growth."

"You must learn things others don’t, see things differently or do a better job of analyzing them – ideally all three.” H. Marks

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Tren Griffin

Tren Griffin Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @trengriffin

20 May
Recording this second follow up podcast with Jim was big fun. One theme of this conversation are the many ways we are the same and yet use different approaches to reach the same or a similar conclusion. There is no one way to successfully invest or live a full and active life.
2/ To illustrate, Jim and are friends with Michael Mauboussin. In Michael's essay released yesterday He describes my natural approach to business and investing, which is bottoms up. morganstanley.com/im/publication… Jim's natural approach is to use statistical factors. Vive la différence!
3/ My first podcast with Jim is linked to below. In our second (linked above) we discuss how our investing and business styles evolved to reflect our personalities and the people who influenced us. We talk about the dotcom era and other shared experiences.infiniteloopspodcast.com/tren-griffin-e…
Read 4 tweets
16 May
John Malone rides again. reuters.com/article/busine…
John Malone: "Recently somebody said, ‘Hey, you lost weight,’ and I said, ‘Yeah, thirty-five pounds and three and a half billion dollars’.” “I’ve done lots of bad deals. When I stick to my knitting I do okay. It’s – it’s when I listen to some pied piper.” google.com/amp/s/25iq.com…
John Malone: "A lot of mergers fail for cultural reasons. Vertical acquisitions are much tougher than horizontal ones. You are essentially buying a business you don’t know and you don’t understand."

“You’ve got to play both offense and defense.”
Read 31 tweets
15 May
What business is this?
"Gross margin decreased from 42% during the year ended Dec. 31, 2019 to 41% during the year ended Dec. 31, 2020, primarily due to an increase in Revenue Share amounts paid to Customers."
Read 4 tweets
13 May
People don't talk enough about the "special purpose" part of a SPAC.

The best explanation of that is in the Steve Martin movie "The Jerk."

Navin explains that he plans to use his special purpose every time he can -- which is just like SPAC sponsors. thetimes.co.uk/article/cyber-…
A screenplay about using BBM92 protocol between two buildings, connected by a 350-m-long fiber, resulting in an average raw (secure) key rate of 135 bits/s (86 bits/s) for a pumping rate of 80 MHz, without resorting to time- or frequency-filtering techniques is a special purpose. Image
Quantum Key Distribution (QKD): As you know, superposition and entanglement are used in quantum communication/QKD. A generator produces two entangled photons where the quantum state of one photon is perfectly equal to another photon, even over great distances!
Read 4 tweets
13 May
At minute 4:46 Bill Gurley describes an approach that is straight up Michael Mauboussin style "Expectations Investing." Take the Airbnb stock price today and reverse engineer what must happen to support that price. One thing you do know for sure is the current price. Invert!
The other Michael Mauboussin style approach Bill Gurley talks about is that multiples: 1) are shortcuts; and 2) are very often not apples to apples. Gurley says in the video that markets may start to be "more discerning" about something like price to sales.abovethecrowd.com/2011/05/24/all…
3/ People can make jokes about ketchup packet supply chains being under stress now, but at 12:22 my friend Josh Wolfe asks a question about far more critical supply chains.

Comedy often is about revealed truth. For example, inside every ketchup pack joke is an important truth.
Read 4 tweets
10 May
1/ Recap misses the most important moment:

"We have a very unusual group of shareholders who look at Berkshire as a lifetime savings vehicle... one they don’t have to think about [and not] look at it again for 10 or 20 years." WB

Is this above you?

cnbc.com/amp/2021/05/01…
2/ That Buffett and Munger have different objectives, time horizons and circle of competence doesn't mean that Munger's investing process isn't worth understanding if you do have a technology circle of competence. You are not them or one of the shareholders they think most about.
3/ If you have a technology and early stage venture heavy portfolio want to balance that with something other than cash or bonds you may want to create a barbell portfolio with some smallish percentage managed by BRK as if you were 75 years old (even though you are 35 years old).
Read 5 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Too expensive? Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal Become our Patreon

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us on Twitter!

:(