2/15 - Back in Oct 2020, I joined the Terra community when it was fairly small in comparison to where it is today
- At that time, the community was focusing on 2 things, adoption of Terra Network and there was a growing interest in Luna's deflationary nature
3/15 - At the same time, people were really curious about how supply of $Luna & other stablecoins is changing on a daily basis
- terra.smartstake.io/history supply change tracker was built to help answer those questions & to provide visibility/transparency .....
4/15 to provide visibility into how minting of KRT/UST was playing out with respect to $Luna & $SDT supply (if you dont know what $SDT is & its purpose, please read up on it)
- With $MIR launch, $UST demand started shooting up.
- In Feb, burning of $Luna took over everything else
- Everyone in the community rallied behind this & Terra experienced huge growth in community in a short span leading up to Anchor launch
- In March, everyone discovered the seigniorage.
6/15 - Yes, it was coded in but everyone including TFL/Do were participant in the Luna burn narrative
- Some proposals were introduced and all $Luna marked for burning was routed to Community Spend with the goal of burning it all as part of Columbus-5 release
7/15 - The need for insurance meant, Ozone came up & the idea of funding it with the community spend coins
- I havent come across anyone that doubts the merits of Ozone
- From Feb till now, community has very passionately supported the idea of $Luna's deflationary nature
8/15 - & rallied behind marketing the impact
- Use of community spend $Luna to fund Ozone may have 0 material impact on market supply of $Luna. So using it for that purpose has no negatives from my viewpoint
- Why I voted Yes on the proposal to burn $Luna without minting $UST:
9/15 - 1) - community spend includes Oracle rewards from last 5-6 weeks 2) - we ran with a narrative 4 last 3 months (actually ever since i have watched Luna but last 3 months with lot more passion and so many more people doing the same). The re-minting dilutes that
10/15 - 3) community spend will be burned was announced on Agora
It's an evolving space & there will always be new opportunities & challenges. Given that tens of thousands of people joined Terra based on the $Luna burn aspects, we need to be considerate of that.
11/15 - I am certainly not in favor of Do having to shell out the seeding for Ozone from his own pocket. I am sure there are tons of ways to do that. Some are listed here:
- raise funds through a public sale
- implement tokenomics that bolster the funding of Ozone
12/15 - Dip into stability reserves - 20% $Luna supply is stability reserves & till 6 months ago they were unused. Route some of them for this purpose
- SDT reserves - 300M released (450M UST) and 100M SDT (150m UST) released for each of next 7 years......
13/15 - Route some of them for this purpose. There was a talk about potentially burning SDT at some point in future
- have network participants provide insurance coverage (your UST remains locked & you earn $OZ tokens in return)
14/15 - You may or may not align with the thoughts presented above or my voting chocie. That's the beauty of Terra Network's decentralized nature. Allows everyone to have a say & make the choices they like/think are best
15/15 - These are exciting times and no matter which way we roll, I am sure TFL/community will keep providing solutions to real world problems, the network will keep getting adopted, & $Luna will keep burning.
Thanks for supporting Smart Stake.
Everyone was excited about all the $Luna that were being burnt. The first seigniorage event covering about 4 weeks happened and that is when people realized the seigniorage aspects. And that triggered a flurry of discussions and several proposals came out
1/8 - $UST & it's peg stability:
- Watch this intro video to understand how Terra stables work:
- Last 6 months have seen an explosive growth in Terra network, its product & stable coin adoption
2/8 - At the same time, the community has grown many folds & some may not fully understand how stables work
- The events of last few days in crypto have been another humbling experience about how crypto works. X times price growth & huge corrections r part of how all chains work
3/8 - Many of you have noticed how the UST peg is off by 1-2% for the last few days
- If you have been around since $MIR launch, you would have noticed how $UST has been selling at a premium whenever there was increased demand on $UST.
- in Oct 2020, was looking for a fundamentally strong project to validate in. based on a discussion with a crypto buddy that uses @SmartStake in multiple chains, started looking into Terra
- It was live for 16 months & starting as a validator is a no-no
2/10 - Seeing the fundamentals, the outward looking focus, decided to jump in & setup my validator
- Was a tiny community full of passionate folks Seb @NicholasFlamelX@kundunsan@Lu_It_Haeng Nacho, Aayush with firm belief that #Terra belongs @ #3 (after BTC & ETH)
- $Luna @ 0.30
3/10 - after remaining on the fringes for a bit, saw that community had questions about Luna supply changes ... more specifically, the reducing Luna supply and where it is going. Terra.smartstake.io was born to answer some of the questions
2/5) - Future genesis airdrops - $ANC airdrop gave 7% in one day by $ value - future launches may not match in airdrop value
- Risk - risk free staking
2 - Luna liquid staking - provide $luna as collateral (locked for 21 days like Luna staking). borrow $UST against collateral
3/5) - net borrow apy ($ANC farming) - 330%+
- net APR far outweighs standard rewards
- no staking rewards & no weekly or genesis airdrops
- Risk - liquidation risk of bLuna if Luna price drops
- you wont be staking with smart stake anymore 🤣
1/8 - #Terra $Luna supply future outlook analysis & its likely consequences
- to meet $UST demand, $Luna continues to be burned to mint more $UST
- 6.6m $Luna burnt in each of the last 2 days
- terra.smartstake.io/history shows the burn & supply metrics
2/8 - pace is expected to remain at this level in near future & if anything may increase when proposal station.terra.money/proposal/36 is passed
- assumption - all network parameters remain as is i.e. same $Luna price, same staking ratio, TFL holdings not required 4 burning $Luna
3/8 - assumption - same $UST demand as today or atleast enough demand to not require the reverse flow (i.e. burn $UST & mint $Luna)
consideration - 64.4m staked amount from TFL holdings is excluded from calculations (plays no role in outcome)