1/ “We can have no finer role model. He was a value investor — a member of that eccentric tribe that believes it’s better to underpay than to overpay.”

This thread reveals the story of the greatest value investor you've never heard of.

The story of Floyd Odlum.

THREAD
2/ With a decent income from his job as a law clerk, Odlum started trading in the stock market. He initially saw the market as a rich, fertile ground for speculative profits. Far from his cemented legacy as a deep value investor.
3/ Yet like most beginning speculators, Odlum too paid his fair share of market tuition.

After losing all his $40,000 starting capital, Odlum retreated from the markets. One newspaper revealed it, “took [Odlum] a while to pay back that sum”.
4/ Yet It was this early $40K loss that turned Odlum from speculator to investor. From tape reader to business analysis.

Soon enough, Odlum would be back. The starting capital would be the same. The approach, anything but similar.
5/ The partnership, formed in 1923, was a couple’s affair. Odlum, George Howard and their wives seeded the partnership with $39,000 ($573K adj. for inflation).

What followed over the next two years was nothing short of incredible.
6/ According to Odlum’s biography, The United States Company grew 17x from 1923 – 1925. What started as a small partnership amongst friends turned into a $660,000 behemoth ($9.47M adjusted for inflation).

Odlum’s two-year CAGR is mind-numbing.
7/ If that wasn’t impressive enough, he generated these returns while working full-time as a law clerk!

How did he generate such outsized returns?

Odlum preferred two kinds of investments:

- Utility stocks
- Special situations
8/ He defined a special situation as “an investment involving not only primary financial sponsorship, but usually also responsibility for the management of the company."
9/ Embedded in Odlum’s strategy was the determination to see a special situation through until success, “[We will] stay with the investment until the essentials of the job have been done, and then move on [to] another special situation”.
10/ Between 1925 – 1928, Odlum steadily grew the partnership. By investing in utilities and special situations, The United States Company AUM grew to $6M (over $88M adjusted for inflation). It was around this time that Odlum began sensing euphoria in the market.
11/ He smelled a top and he decided it was time for him to act.

With $14M in cash, Floyd sat on his hands. Waiting for the next market crash, which shortly followed.
12/ Odlum was prepared and took full advantage once fear had fully gripped the market and there was blood in the streets…
13/ “After the crash, Odlum, looking around quietly with more ready money than almost anybody in Wall Street except [a] few of the big banks, noticed that the trend in trusts had reversed.”

Odlum’s 1929 Strategy: Sit. Wait. Attack.
14/ Along with his traditional investments, Odlum dabbled in a number of other industries, including:

- Mining
- Oil and gas
- Motion picture production and distribution
- Aircraft and airlines
- Department stores
15/ But his bread and butter during the Depression was buying investment trusts. His strategy was simple. He found investment trusts that had fallen so much their stock prices were trading less than the value of their marketable securities.
16/ He discovered he could buy these trusts, liquidate their assets, and reap large profits for his stakeholders. He was buying dollar bills for $0.60 and he milked this strategy for all it’s worth. He ended up buying and merging investment trust twenty-two times.
17/ The newspaper article profiled these dealings:

“He figured out that by buying all the outstanding shares of a particular trust, he was really buying cash or its equivalent at sixty cents on the dollar.”
18/ When he didn’t have the cash to buy the trusts, he sold shares in his own company, Atlas, to fund the purchases. After exchanging his stock for the trust’s stock, Odlum would merge or dissolved the existing trust, keeping the cash and assets within Atlas Corp.
19/ This strategy helped grow his assets to $150M ($2.2B adjusted for inflation).

Between 1929 and 1935, Odlum invested (and controlled) many diverse businesses.
20/ He owned Greyhound Bus, a little motion picture studio named Paramount, Hilton Hotels, three women’s apparel companies, uranium mines, a bank, an office building, and an oil company.

Taking It All In

Odlum started with $40,000 and lost it all speculating in the market.
21/ He then pooled together another $39,000 to form his first partnership. That original $39,000 grew to $150M in controlled assets. All that during a span of just twelve years.

Odlum grew assets 384,515% in a bit over a decade. That’s a 32,042% CAGR for asset growth.
22/ And his early partnership returns are just as impressive. Odlum grew assets from $39,000 to $6M between 1923 – 1929. That’s a cumulative 15,284% return. In other words, Odlum compounded capital at an annual rate of 2,547%.
23/ I want to finish this thread with three takeaways from Floyd Odlum’s investing career:

- You don’t need to be 100% invested 24/7
- Boring is beautiful
- Be a dumpster diver (with standards)
24/ /Conclusion

I hope you enjoyed this thread. If you liked what you read, consider subscribing to our new Substack Newsletter "Macro Musings"

macroops.substack.com

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Brandon Beylo

Brandon Beylo Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @marketplunger1

20 May
Some quick thoughts for new investors about writing up a new idea:

When I first started investing (and still sometimes do today) I wanted to write everything down about a stock.

Every data point on paper.

Yet this brain-dump removed the LEARNING from "learning the biz"...
The more I asked other investors about their processes, the more I realized they spend less time "data dumping" and more time deeply thinking.

I know, it sounds pithy.

But these are my favorite investors. What did they know that I didn't?

Answer: The power of compounding..
Here's what they (generally) do.

The best investors I know slowly accumulate knowledge on a company or industry (months, years, etc.).

Then, when a new idea surfaces, they leverage all that compounded knowledge and the actual act of writing the idea becomes effortless.
Read 5 tweets
13 May
There aren’t many investors compounding capital at double digits over the course of decades and those that do are already well known (i.e., that guy from Omaha). However, in a small office above a taco shop, a man did just that.

[THREAD]
Allan Mecham ran a hedge fund called Arlington Value who has demonstrated the advantage in simplicity, long-term thinking, and the power of compounding.

Arlington Value doesn’t have a large team of analysts.
They don’t run advanced machine-learning algorithms or exploit esoteric satellite data and there’s not a single distinguished diploma on their walls.
Read 11 tweets
12 May
Reading this 2003 blog post from @bgurley on Internet-based businesses and how many investors threw every dot-com business out with the bathwater.

Gurley offered 4 reasons why some companies worked when everyone thought they wouldn't.

[THREAD]
abovethecrowd.com/2003/04/23/dot…
1) They weren’t bad ideas:

"In fact many were good ideas. Were there too many consumer startups? Yes! But there were also too many software companies, semiconductor companies, telecom equipment companies, and the list goes on and on.
As we later learned, over-funding (i.e., too many startups with too much capital) was the key issue, not the particular investment category. Low-cost, high-scale marketplaces do in fact exhibit increasing returns.
Read 9 tweets
12 May
Successful investing is an active rebellion against one’s instinctual proclivity to sabotage long-term returns.

In a perfect world, investing is like gardening. You cut the weeds (losers) and water you flowers (winners).

In practice, investors do the opposite.
We tend to sell winning stocks too early (cutting the fruit) while desperately clinging to losing positions (watering the weeds).

This habit is called the Disposition Effect.
Coined by Shefrin and Statman in 1985, the Disposition effect explains the tendency for investors to cut their winners short while riding their losers lower.

It’s an academic way of saying, “most investors suck.”
Read 4 tweets
11 May
Love reading @RudivNiekerk investor letters. What he’s doing in South Africa is truly differentiated and special.

So I spent last weekend reviewing the African $AFK ETF and picked my favorite names in the space.

Here’s a thread on what I found 🇿🇦🇿🇦🇿🇦
Guaranty Bank (GUARANTY.NSE)

One of the cheapest biz I’ve seen in any market. The core banking segment generates 26% ROE with 51% NI margins. Expecting ~13% 2022 rev growth.

You can buy it for 4.5x current earnings w/ a 10% DY.
Mtn Nigeria Communication (MTNN)

Nigeria’s leading mobile operator. 76.5M subscribers and the #1 NPS score in its industry. 32% EBIT margins.

Largest mobile network w/ 49% smartphone penetration. Data rev up 57% YoY & will grow w/ smartphone adoption.

Can buy for ~8x EBIT.
Read 7 tweets
12 Apr
A week ago, @SagaPartners said something that's stuck with me:

"A potentially great idea is when no one agrees with you. A potentially bad idea is when no one agrees with you."

I've thought about some ways to help investors think about these two conundrums ...

[THREAD]
1/ Determine what you are disagreeing over.

If you're on two different "logic" planets, the argument will fail because nobody's gonna listen from that starting position.

Find common principles on why you're wrong and go from there.
2/ Give fair weight to your "opponents" POV and credentials.

If you're pitching a media stock and @AndrewRangeley is ripping it to shreds, that matters *WAY MORE* than say, someone like me who has issues with one or two points.

Respecting intellectual authority can only help
Read 8 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Too expensive? Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal Become our Patreon

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us on Twitter!

:(