In the words of Muḥammad Aḥmad Khalafallāh, "The intent of the Qurʾān in its narratives... admonition (ʿibra) & exhortation (ʿiẓa)"--NOT "instruction in history or explication of its [literal] truth." 1/
This point is elaborated further by Naṣr Abū Zayd: "Historical incidents mentioned in the Qur’anic narrative are presented in a literary style to convey lessons of admonition and exhortation... [They] are meant to serve ethical, spiritual, & religious purposes." 2/
This does not mean the stories are necessarily wholly independent of history. As Abū Zayd goes on, "They might be based on some historical incidents, but the purpose is not to provide knowledge about history." What the Qur'an draws on is collective historical memory... 3/
which it uses & then rearticulates stories in a certain way for specific intents & purposes. The Qur'an, therefore, exhibits creative literary freedom in order to accomplish this, which is evident even when the same story is retold in different ways in the Qur'an. 4/
As I have mentioned before, the great Muḥammad Iqbāl argued the same, & his entire passage is reproduced in whole by Khalafallāh. Iqbāl refers to the Adamic creation & fall story as "legend" & "myth" as well, while recognizing the great power of these stories. 5/
Will you also issue your takfīr against the great Islamic poet & philosopher, Iqbāl? If so, you will show your takfīrī colors to the whole world. If not, then why the inconsistency? You must then judge me the same way as you do Iqbāl. Pick your poison. 6/
As for the facile response that this is what the Qur'an itself says the Arab pagans used to say--"tales of the ancients" (asāṭīr al-awwalīn), I have already answered this, as has Khalafallāh before me. 7/
This phrase--"tales of the ancients" (asāṭīr al-awwalīn)--appears in 9 places: Q 6:25, 8:31, 16:24, 23:83, 25:5, 27:68, 46:17, 68:15, & 83:13. A close reading of these passages reveals to me that it does not refer to the question of historicity (which would be ahistorical!) 8/
but rather it is a stock phrase used by the pagans against the idea of resurrection, judgment, & hereafter, which they did not believe in & found incredible. Not only do I affirm the resurrection, judgment, & hereafter, I consider this creedal & a part of the Qur'anic kerygma. 9/
Q 68:14-5: "They say, 'What! When we have died and are dust and bones, are we to be resurrected? We and our forefathers were certainly warned of this before. These are naught but tales of the ancients." 10/
Q 23:82-3: "They say: 'What! When we have died and are dust and bones, are we to be resurrected? We and our forefathers were certainly warned of this before. These are naught but tales of the ancients." 11/
Q 83:10-13: "Woe that Day to the deniers, who deny the Day of Judgment, which none deny save every sinful transgressor. When Our signs are recited unto him, he says, 'Tales of the ancients!'" 12/
The Qur'an continuously threatened the belligerent pagans with the coming of the Hour, whereupon God's supernatural doom would descend upon them, rendering judgment in this life and/or greater judgment in the next. 13/
The purpose of all this was to get them to stop in their hostility & aggression against the believers. But, the pagans would taunt the Prophet & ask them why no such divinely ordained doom befell them. This was, to them, simply "tales of the ancients" with which... 14/
...the Prophet threatened them.
Q 8:30-33: "[They] plotted against you: to capture, kill, or expel you...And when Our signs are recited unto them, they say, 'We have heard already. Had we willed, we could have said the like of this. This is naught but tales of the ancients.' 15/
"And [remember] when they said, 'O God, if this be the truth from You, rain down stones upon us from the sky, or bring us a painful punishment.' But God will not punish them while you are among them. And God will not punish them while they seek forgiveness..." 15/
In Q 16:24, the Qur'an just prior narrates the idea that the martyrs are alive with God, & in the very next breath--after the pagans say "tales of the ancients"--the Qur'an says, "that on the Day of Resurrection they may bear their burdens completely..." 16/
This one is important:
Q 27:67-8: "And those who disbelieve say, 'What? When we and our fathers are dust, shall we indeed be brought forth? Indeed, we were promised this, we and our forefathers before, this is naught but tales of the ancients!'" 17/
What they & their forefathers were promised before--& which they considered mere "tales of the ancients"--was that they would be resurrected. This is an important theme because the Qur'an is talking about ultimate moral responsibility. 18/
Q 46:17: "As for one who says to his parents, 'Fie upon you both! Do you promise me that I shall be brought forth when generations have passed away before me?' ... [His parents say:] 'Woe unto you! Believe! Surely God's Promise is true...' 19/
"...Whereupon [the son] says, 'This is naught but tales of the ancients!'"
So, we see that the son could not believe in the idea of God's Promise--which is toward the believers to save & redeem them, but also to the Rejectors, who will be resurrected to be judged & punished. 20/
Similarly, in Q 6:25, after "tales of the ancients," the Qur'an goes on: "If you could see when they are arranged before the Fire... Nay, but it is clear to them what they used to hide... Truly they are the liars. They say, 'There is naught but our life in this world... 21/
"... and we shall not be resurrected.' If you could see when they are arraigned before their Lord, He will say, 'Is this not the truth?' They will say, 'Yes, indeed, by our Lord!' He will say, 'Then taste the punishment for having disbelieved.' Lost indeed are... 22/
"...those who deny the meeting with God till when the Hour comes..."

So, this is a recurring theme. This theme, i.e. of God's promise (the Hour, judgment, & resurrection) is mentioned in 8 out of the 9 passages in which the phrase is used. It is a stock phrase. 23/
The Rejectors denied God's promise as encapsulated in the Qur'an, claiming that the Prophet had forged it & was just regurgitating "tales of the ancients" when he threatened them with God's Promise. 24/
Khalafallāh, meanwhile, points out that the Arab pagans were calling them "tales of the ancients" because they were accusing him of taking these stories from some mysterious figure or jinn, as opposed to from divine inspiration/revelation. 25/

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Dr. Javad T Hashmi

Dr. Javad T Hashmi Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @DrJavadTHashmi

21 May
@theMuhammadtk @BrotherAlexP So, like I said, the first part is to realize that we all understand some parts of the Qur'an literally & other parts not so. We also won't necessarily agree with each other what parts should be taken literally, & that difference of opinion is unavoidable & OK... 1/
@theMuhammadtk @BrotherAlexP ...as long as we acknowledge that our interpretations are to some extent tentative & provisionary. We do our best to understand God's Book & to understand the Divine Will. At the end of the day, Allāhu ʾAʿlam! 2/
@theMuhammadtk @BrotherAlexP It does not, however, have to be a haphazard, random, or whimsical process. Instead, we can look to interpretive rules of the past in this regard: the voices of Ghazālī, Fakhr al-Dīn al-Rāzī, & Ibn Rushd inform me. 3/
Read 17 tweets
19 May
Student: "Islam says XYZ about ABC..."
Professor: "No! Islam is not monolithic! Islam has many schools & sects..." *shows @KhalilAndani's viral chart*
Student: "OK, but aren't 90% of Muslims Sunnīs? That's who I'm talking about..."
Professor: *stumped* 1/
[Infomercial music]: Are you a prof who teaches an intro Islam class & want to impart on students an awareness of the internal diversity of Islam, but struggle how to do so??

INTRODUCING my hot-off-the-press article
"Overcoming Religious Illiteracy":
brill.com/view/journals/…
2/
I use Islamic bioethics to talk about academic theology & Islamic studies more broadly, so don't let the word "bioethics" scare/bore you! I hope professors who teach intro classes to Islam can find it useful as I warn against what I call the "Islam 101" approach. 3/
Read 10 tweets
19 May
Khalil, I think your chart is really great & will absolutely use it as a teaching tool. However, as you know, there are many ways to view the internal diversity of Islam, a point I highlight in my forthcoming article. I wish to highlight another aspect that you might add... 1/
...possibly in a corner or follow-up image. I write in my article: "Somewhat ironically, this fixation on sects and schools serves only to flatten out Islam and thereby obscures its true diversity. This is because it seems to
imply that the differences of opinion... 2/
"... over specific issues are rooted solely in
the difference of sect or school." Then, I illustrate this difference of opinion with case examples. But, in any case, here is the image I used for teaching a class: 3/ Image
Read 5 tweets
16 May
I just watched the clip of @mohammed_hijab doing takfīr of me, & must say, it is very light on actual argument. His first claim against me is that I am "just" a "medical doctor" & not a professor in Islamic studies... 1/
...even though he very well knows that I am a PhD candidate in Islamic studies at Harvard, with a BA & two masters degrees in the same field. Sorry for my Reza Aslan impersonation here, but seriously, @mohammed_hijab, no need to be so envious. 2/
Now, to the substance of it, yes I have claimed that my academic journey has led me to embrace the idea that the Qur'an should not be understood as a book of literal history or science. Instead, the Qur'an relies on historical memory in order to convey... 3/
Read 25 tweets
16 May
I was someone who recently said that we should not portray the Israel-Palestine conflict as a religious dispute, so allow me to clarify. Our religion calls to certain universal moral values, virtues, & principles: justice, peace, equity, the right to life, liberty, & religion. 1/
My dissertation work focuses on jihād in the Qur'an: the Qur'an calls to jihād (a word that means "[holy] struggle" -- NOT synonymous with "holy war") against (religious) persecution & being expelled from one's homeland--what we today call ethnic cleansing. 2/
Our Qur'anic & Islamic ethic stands with the oppressed against the oppressor. If you are channeling these universal moral values & virtues in the language of religion & scripture, then please go ahead. This is something I support & engage in myself. 3/
Read 15 tweets
14 May
I see some Muslims celebrating Iran's rocket support to Palestine: "Iran proved that Muslim umah [sic] is one nation and Iran stand with Palestine." However, I bet you didn't know about the BILLIONS of dollars in secret weapons sales between Iran & Israel. A thread 🧵. 1/
Maybe you also didn't know that the CIA supported & funded the mullahs & ayatollahs (religious clerics) in 1953 during the coup to remove the democratically elected prime minister of Iran, Mohammad Mossadegh. Mossadegh wanted to nationalize the country's oil resources... 2/
...which had been firmly in the control of British hands (what would become BP). Angered, the British MI6 helped the American CIA secretly overthrow Mosaddegh: Operation AJAX. As journalist Robert Dreyfuss notes in his book "Devil's Game"... 3/
Read 25 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Too expensive? Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal Become our Patreon

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us on Twitter!

:(