Losing track, but I think this is the 8th detailed and damning investigation into #Windrush and the hostile environment that I've written about for the Guardian
I think the first was this one on
Windrush generation detention, by Joint Committee on Human Rights, which concluded: "We take the view that there was in all likelihood a systemic failure"
2nd Home Affairs select committee report June 2018
Concluded: Windrush generation treated as if they were in the country illegally despite being lawfully resident for many decades; have lost homes/ jobs/ been refused healthcare, pensions/access to benefits publications.parliament.uk/pa/cm201719/cm…
3rd in November 2018
National Audit Office criticised officials for bad data that wrongly classified people as illegal immigrants, risky use of deportation targets, poor value for money of hostile environment policies, failure to respond to warnings nao.org.uk/report/handlin…
4th March 2019, Public Accounts Committee: Home Office made life-changing decisions based on incorrect data, remains complacent about its systemic/ cultural problems, displayed a lack of concern re impact of immigration policies on undocumented people
5th, March 2020 Wendy Williams Review.
The HO displayed “ignorance and thoughtlessness” on race and history of Windrush generation consistent with elements of institutional racism. Warnings repeatedly ignored. Scandal was “foreseeable and avoidable” gov.uk/government/pub…
6th IPPR found “hostile environment” policy fostered racism, pushed people into destitution, wrongly targeted people who are living in the UK legally. Measures failed to achieve objective of increasing the numbers of people voluntarily leaving the UK ippr.org/research/publi…
Eye-poppingly extraordinary defence of Theresa May's hostile environment policy from her ex-aide Nick Timothy, describing it as a "sensible policy", adding "I was never warned" that the wrong people could be targeted.
See this from @fionabawdon who warned that Windrush could happen with absolute clarity years before it did.
The Home Office read her report and declined to take any action thejusticegap.com/windrush-gener…
But it wasn't just legal charities...
It was also Conservative ministers like Eric Pickles who said requiring landlords to conduct immigration checks on potential tenants was a bad idea, warning that “anyone foreign-looking” would face challenges theguardian.com/uk-news/2018/a…
Why does an army veteran who spent a decade in the British army, and has lived here for years paying taxes and national insurance, have to pay £27,000 in NHS bills, after an emergency operation to remove a brain tumour?
Dear @patel4witham I would like to send you a copy of the book on Windrush I've written because on the basis of today's debate I'm worried that you and your colleagues are muddled about the causes of the problem guardianbookshop.com/the-windrush-b…
@patel4witham in every debate about #windrush there is a lot of buck-passing between parties about who was originally responsible for the hostile environment and who should be blamed
@patel4witham and it is true that many have experienced problems for decades because they haven't had documentation that proved their status, but it is disingenuous to suggest that this is a problem which has been caused by successive governments
Very sad but also angry to hear that Hubert Howard, 62, died today
He spent the last weeks of his life in intensive care, still fighting to get citizenship.
Arrived in UK aged 3 from Jamaica, only finally granted citizenship here 3 weeks before he died
He had hoped that #Windrush compensation money would allow him to make a trip back to Jamaica to visit his mother's grave. But he was still waiting for compensation
He lost his job as a caretaker with Peabody housing in 2012 because he couldn't prove he was in the UK legally. Even though he had arrived at the age of three, legally, half a century earlier
Gove says no one has responded with more grace and commitment (or something like that) to #windrush than Amber - but that is not true. Less than a fortnight ago she had done nothing at all (at least publicly) to show this was an issue she was worried about
A fortnight ago the guardian had already published many detailed accounts of people made homeless, sent to detention centres, sacked from jobs, unable to visit dying parents, refused benefits, asked to pay for NHS treatment - I think around 10 already printed
I’m sure Rudd must have been very busy think about Brexit - and that’s part of the problem. She may not have been reading the Guardian that regularly. But what about her staff? Couldn’t they have flagged it as important?