The suffering from this tragedy will always be felt but there is hope of a future where greater awareness and responsibility for the effect of actions on others, can help prevent a reoccurrence of similar circumstances.
Whilst many might wish to achieve closure, this cannot be at the expense of others nor can it be through oversimplification of events and the role played by everyone involved directly or even indirectly, as the public unwittingly were, as consumers of media.
To varying degrees, everyone shared the experience of public humiliation that was so visible in body language and comments openly disrespective of members of the Royal Family and the significance of their roles in the traditions and history influencing life within the UK.
Any attempt to identify those 'responsible' is a bit like trying to unravel and measure a very long strand of spaghetti, since all actions and comments have consequences and these in turn, influence other actions and comments.
"Two wrongs don’t make a right; but blaming one institution for what Diana went through – while forgetting or erasing the role of another – gets us nowhere. The real apology comes when EVERYONE who played a part, owns it."
By focusing on what can be done to prevent a reoccurrence of similar circumstances and resulting events and outcomes, it is hoped that the exercise of greater responsibility and accountability can make us all more mindful of the consequences of our actions and comments.
There are appropriate ways of handling matters and there are inappropriate ways, insofar as the latter can serve to add fuel to the fire - for what purpose and who benefits from perpetuating a blame game?
"The UK produces more plastic waste per person than almost any other country in the world, and many of us spend time carefully sorting our recycling."
"The government claims that almost half of the UK’s plastic packaging gets recycled, but that simply isn’t true."
"Well over half of the household plastic packaging the government claims is recycled is sent abroad, most of it going to countries with very low recycling rates and a serious problem with plastic waste being dumped or burned illegally."
If, your comment is based upon partisan tactics from opposition parties to smear the incumbent @scotgov then you have no evidence since their goals are entirely party political.
@scotgov "We are reminded also that the UK has changed significantly during its history. It is also a union which evolves and is CONTINUING TO EVOLVE, as the introduction of devolution in 1999 for Northern Ireland, Scotland and Wales demonstrated."
@scotgov "The Scottish Independence Referendum represents the latest stage in the evolving story of the political and
constitutional shape of the UK."
"Curtice said: “The thing that clearly comes out of this forecast is we are talking about a situation where roughly half of Scotland has voted for a pro-independence party and roughly half has voted for a pro-Unionist party, ..."
"...so this election has very clearly underlined the sharp division, even division, between Unionism and support for independence in Scotland.”
"He said that, unless the polls shift, this means that a second independence referendum would be a huge gamble for either side and that no-one can know how Scotland would vote."
"THE “once in a generation” phrase parroted by Conservatives in their attempt to block a second independence vote is nothing but a slogan and has no constitutional relevance, one of the architects of the Edinburgh Agreement has said."
"The context of Northern Ireland with the ending of the Troubles then raises an interesting point. Northern Ireland has, under British law, a guarantee that the Secretary of State will consider any fresh referendum on Irish unity 7 years after an initial referendum."
If a similar definition of a 'political' generation were applied to the will of the Scottish people to pursue #ScottishIndependence 🏴, 7 years will have lapsed since #indyref 2014, on 18 September 2021.