THREAD on vax study for B.1.617.2 (new "Indian" variant):

@jburnmurdoch broke a story from PHE data with the first real world analysis of AZ & Pfizer vaccine efficacy against B.1.617.2.

I am less convinced this is great news than some. Here's why.
ft.com/content/a70d42… 1/16
The study estimates that both vaccines are 33% at preventing symptomatic B.1.617.2 disease after 1 dose (vs 51% against B117 ("Kent")) and 81% effective after 2 doses (vs 87% for B117).

Too little data on preventing severe disease to say much but v likely to be better. 2/16
So the vaccines do mostly work against B.1.617.2 - especially after 2 doses. That's good news - but not surprising.

We already had evidence from a care home outbreak, & Bolton hospital. Early lab studies suggested less escape than B.1351 "S Africa"
blogs.bmj.com/bmj/2021/05/18… 3/16
Govt ministers have been reassuring the public for a few weeks that vaccines would work against this vaccine - with little acknowledgement that this efficacy might be lower than against the current dominant B117 variant
standard.co.uk/news/uk/matt-h… 4/16
The fact is that while total vax escape would be terrible (& thank god we don't have it), *any* vax escape has consequences for the roadmap & current levels of opening.

Efficacy of only 33% after 1 dose *matters* when only 40% of adults & no kids have been fully vaxxed. 5/16
SAGE modelling subgroup (Spi-M) modelled the roadmap with a MORE transmissible variant but NO loss of vaccine efficacy which suggested that 50% more transmissibily could lead to a surge as bad as this winter.
assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/government/upl… 6/16 Image
SAGE minutes from last Thursday's (13 May) meeting highlight the concern about increased transmissibilty and also the potential for *some* vaccine escape (less than "S African" variant)

assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/government/upl… 7/16 Image
The JUNIPER subgroup for SAGE also presented evidence for increased transmissiblity of this variant last Thursday (13th May) with this warning:

"Incontrovertible evidence that B.1.617.2 is more transmissible may come too late"

assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/government/upl… 8/16 Image
The govt decided to press on with stage 3 of roadmap on Monday 17th May anyway - although it was pretty clear from Thursday's (13 May) meeting that Test 4 of "no new variants changing risk" had been failed. 9/16
So we now have a situation where we have a more transmissible variant AND with moderate vax escape after one dose. This scenario was NOT modelled by SAGE SPI-M. But given either of these is modelled to lead to a surge, combo makes the scarier SAGE models more likely. 10/16
The scarier models are scary under just step 3 of the roadmap (where we are now) - and get considerably worse if we progress to step 4 in June.

Letting infection run also provides more opportunities for further mutation (and thousands of new long covid cases). 11/16
And yes - it might still be that the variant is not so transmissible as to cause a big problem - and some of its rapid spread may be due to this moderate vax escape (although most cases in younger unvaxxed groups).

But as JUNIPER said - risk benefit is for caution NOW. 12/16
The way out is to vaccinate - FULLY vaccinate - as many people as possible as quickly as possible. And to do this BEFORE we move to step 4 of the roadmap.

AND to augment vax with supported isolation, local contact tracing, targeted testing, safer indoor spaces. NOW. 13/16
In particular we need safer schools - where we have unprotected populations in children. We are already seeing case rates in Bolton in school-age children going through the roof.

We urgently need PHE data on B.1.617.2 spread in schools as well. 14/16 Image
So the good news about today's story is that it confirms that FULL vaccination still provides a way out (alongside other measures).

The bad news is that it makes proceeding with current roadmap a very bad idea & moving to Step 3 last Monday might have been a big mistake. 15/16
As individuals we can also do our bit:
1) get vaccinated when it's offered (both doses!)
2) assume you can still pass it on, esp after just 1 dose, and keep being careful. 16/16

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Prof. Christina Pagel

Prof. Christina Pagel Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @chrischirp

23 May
LONG THREAD on B.1.617.2 & latest PHE data covering:

1) latest tech report on B.1.617.2 (aka "India" variant)
2) vaccine efficacy against B.1.617.2
3) consequences for roadmap
4) avoidability... or not.
2. So first off, PHE tech report released late last night.

Can detect B.1.617.2 by direct sequencing OR by using "S gene" in a PCR test (now 99% of these are B.1.617).

BOTH these methods now estimate that as of 15th May B.1.617.2 was on cusp of being dominant English variant. ImageImage
3. There is no evidence that B.1.617.2 causes more severe illness than B.1.1.7 (aka "Kent" variant). This is good news but data still quite sparse.
Read 36 tweets
23 May
I disagree. Let's look at the last 3 crucial weeks:

6th May: PHE very concerned about B.1.617.2 & about to make a VoC. Report delayed because of local elections, pubished 7 May. PHE bounced into announcement by Guardian & Channel 4 coverage.

theguardian.com/world/2021/may… 1/5
13th May: Report was ready on Thursday afternoon with a page on schools data (seen by Observer) - report published hours later in the evening with just the schools page removed.
Observer has seen evidence this removal was at Num 10 request.
theguardian.com/world/2021/may… 2/5
20th May: PHE told journalists report would be released on Thursday (when it was due). it was not. Then Friday lunchtime - it was not. Then Friday sometime. It was not.

Finally released Sat night - no press release (unlike vax report released at same time). No school data. 3/5
Read 6 tweets
20 May
THREAD about Nepal - *please read & share*:

India had the eyes of the world upon it a couple of weeks ago as the scale of its covid crisis became clear.

Nepal's crisis is worse. The UN says Nepal now has the highest transmission in the world
reliefweb.int/sites/reliefwe… 1/7
Cases may look like they're plateauing but testing is at capacity and positivity rates are almost 50% (1 in 2 people testing positive!!).

This is the world's highest positive rate. 2/7
Very few people have received even one dose of vaccine.

Nepal's healthcare system is also weaker than India's. 3/7
Read 7 tweets
19 May
THREAD on schools, kids & Bolton:

I think we need to talk again about making schools safer as B.1.617.2 (new variant) spreads.

Case rates in school age kids in Bolton are very high - higher in 5 - 14 yr olds than they've ever been.

Surge testing likely some of it, but not all
Cases in over 20s are going up steeply in younger adults - mostly not vaxxed.

Over 50s (mostly partially vaxxed) going up steeply but lower rates and over 60s (mostly fully vaxxed) the least.

Vaccination is helping & cases rates in all over 20s much lower than Oct & Jan peaks
But if we look at under 20s (unvaxxed) it looks different. Over 15s (some in school, some not) going up steeply but not yet at Oct peak.

5-9 & 10-14 yr olds a *lot* higher than they've ever been.

Under 4's climbing steeply but not higher yet than previous peak.
Read 11 tweets
19 May
SHORT THREAD: Discussed the spread of B.1.617.2 (the variant first sequenced in India) on @BBCRadio4

First off, the data just don't support vaccine hesitancy as reason for spread 1/5
Data on vaccine uptake by age group in Bolton and Blackburn (via @doctor_oxford from NHS England data) 2/5
Data on younger age groups being infected from @jburnmurdoch this time for Bolton and Bedford 3/5
Read 7 tweets
18 May
1 THREAD on latest COG data on B1.617.2 (so called "India" variant) in England

COG sequences positive tests from the community (~50% of them), all travellers to UK & from surge testing. Data is updated almost every day.

What does it tell us about spread?
sars2.cvr.gla.ac.uk/cog-uk/#shiny-…
2 COG data is not entirely representative because it over-represents surge and traveller cases.

Sanger data removes traveller and surge cases to try to get a picture of community transmission, but Sanger only updates once a week.

What if we compare the two?
3 This compares the number of sequenced tests of B.1.617.2 that appear in COG (black) and Sanger (blue).

Over time there is much more overlap between the two showing that community cases are growing and that COG is becoming more representative of community cases (Sanger).
Read 11 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Too expensive? Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal Become our Patreon

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us on Twitter!

:(