THREAD on vax study for B.1.617.2 (new "Indian" variant):
@jburnmurdoch broke a story from PHE data with the first real world analysis of AZ & Pfizer vaccine efficacy against B.1.617.2.
I am less convinced this is great news than some. Here's why. ft.com/content/a70d42… 1/16
The study estimates that both vaccines are 33% at preventing symptomatic B.1.617.2 disease after 1 dose (vs 51% against B117 ("Kent")) and 81% effective after 2 doses (vs 87% for B117).
Too little data on preventing severe disease to say much but v likely to be better. 2/16
So the vaccines do mostly work against B.1.617.2 - especially after 2 doses. That's good news - but not surprising.
We already had evidence from a care home outbreak, & Bolton hospital. Early lab studies suggested less escape than B.1351 "S Africa" blogs.bmj.com/bmj/2021/05/18… 3/16
Govt ministers have been reassuring the public for a few weeks that vaccines would work against this vaccine - with little acknowledgement that this efficacy might be lower than against the current dominant B117 variant standard.co.uk/news/uk/matt-h… 4/16
The fact is that while total vax escape would be terrible (& thank god we don't have it), *any* vax escape has consequences for the roadmap & current levels of opening.
Efficacy of only 33% after 1 dose *matters* when only 40% of adults & no kids have been fully vaxxed. 5/16
SAGE modelling subgroup (Spi-M) modelled the roadmap with a MORE transmissible variant but NO loss of vaccine efficacy which suggested that 50% more transmissibily could lead to a surge as bad as this winter. assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/government/upl… 6/16
SAGE minutes from last Thursday's (13 May) meeting highlight the concern about increased transmissibilty and also the potential for *some* vaccine escape (less than "S African" variant)
The govt decided to press on with stage 3 of roadmap on Monday 17th May anyway - although it was pretty clear from Thursday's (13 May) meeting that Test 4 of "no new variants changing risk" had been failed. 9/16
So we now have a situation where we have a more transmissible variant AND with moderate vax escape after one dose. This scenario was NOT modelled by SAGE SPI-M. But given either of these is modelled to lead to a surge, combo makes the scarier SAGE models more likely. 10/16
The scarier models are scary under just step 3 of the roadmap (where we are now) - and get considerably worse if we progress to step 4 in June.
Letting infection run also provides more opportunities for further mutation (and thousands of new long covid cases). 11/16
And yes - it might still be that the variant is not so transmissible as to cause a big problem - and some of its rapid spread may be due to this moderate vax escape (although most cases in younger unvaxxed groups).
But as JUNIPER said - risk benefit is for caution NOW. 12/16
The way out is to vaccinate - FULLY vaccinate - as many people as possible as quickly as possible. And to do this BEFORE we move to step 4 of the roadmap.
AND to augment vax with supported isolation, local contact tracing, targeted testing, safer indoor spaces. NOW. 13/16
In particular we need safer schools - where we have unprotected populations in children. We are already seeing case rates in Bolton in school-age children going through the roof.
We urgently need PHE data on B.1.617.2 spread in schools as well. 14/16
So the good news about today's story is that it confirms that FULL vaccination still provides a way out (alongside other measures).
The bad news is that it makes proceeding with current roadmap a very bad idea & moving to Step 3 last Monday might have been a big mistake. 15/16
As individuals we can also do our bit: 1) get vaccinated when it's offered (both doses!) 2) assume you can still pass it on, esp after just 1 dose, and keep being careful. 16/16
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
I disagree. Let's look at the last 3 crucial weeks:
6th May: PHE very concerned about B.1.617.2 & about to make a VoC. Report delayed because of local elections, pubished 7 May. PHE bounced into announcement by Guardian & Channel 4 coverage.
13th May: Report was ready on Thursday afternoon with a page on schools data (seen by Observer) - report published hours later in the evening with just the schools page removed.
Observer has seen evidence this removal was at Num 10 request. theguardian.com/world/2021/may… 2/5
20th May: PHE told journalists report would be released on Thursday (when it was due). it was not. Then Friday lunchtime - it was not. Then Friday sometime. It was not.
Finally released Sat night - no press release (unlike vax report released at same time). No school data. 3/5
2 COG data is not entirely representative because it over-represents surge and traveller cases.
Sanger data removes traveller and surge cases to try to get a picture of community transmission, but Sanger only updates once a week.
What if we compare the two?
3 This compares the number of sequenced tests of B.1.617.2 that appear in COG (black) and Sanger (blue).
Over time there is much more overlap between the two showing that community cases are growing and that COG is becoming more representative of community cases (Sanger).