I don't think everyone realizes that the phrase "Roaring Twenties" - referring to the decade of the 1920s - was not coined entirely as a compliment. 1/x
The phrase "Roaring Twenties" was derived from the "Roaring Forties," the very powerful westerly winds that blow between 40 and 50 degrees latitude in the southern hemisphere. The Roaring Forties could hugely speed sailing ships - but also swamp and sink them. 2/x
Whoever borrowed the adjective "roaring" for the decade of the 1920s didn't mean to say that the decade was serenely prosperous, but that it was wild, nerve-wracking, and dangerous, like the far south seas below Australia. 3/x
Hence the many premonitions of doom that fill the pages of eg The Great Gatsby, that brilliant novel of the period. The era's famous dance marathons seemed symbolic: frenzy leading sooner or later to inevitable collapse. 4/x
That's not what we want from our new decade! So nix talk of a "second roaring twenties." If the decade ahead delivers enduring prosperity and peace after the pandemic and the moral disaster of Trump, the 2020s will deserve a happier nickname all of their very own. END
This piece has sparked a lot of comment, some of it very angry. Almost all the comments are answered in the body of the piece, but let me underscore one point here ...
The origin of the coronavirus - in a Chinese lab, in an animal - remains unsettled. It's important to resolve the question as best we can. The Chinese authorities have not been transparent - and that's itself a warning that something important may be buried here. 2/x
If the lab-theory proves true, the political consequences will be serious. There's a whole other article to be written gaming out what those consequences would be, but ... serious. 3/x
When the Obama White House in 2009 declined to take questions from Fox News reporters on the grounds that "Fox was not a news organization," the rest of the White House press gallery went to bat for Fox. EG: theatlantic.com/culture/archiv…
A decade later, the Fox affiliate in Florida is accepting exclusive media rights to coverage of taxpayer-funded state business from Governor Rick DeSantis. 2/x
The bend-over-backwards determination to recognize Fox as a legitimate news organization is never reciprocated by Fox itself, however. 3/x
Also for those interested, I have a tab on my website called "Second Thoughts" where I post articles I have written over the years explaining how and why I changed my mind on some issues. davidfrum.com/articles?categ…
1/2
You may notice two gaps: climate change and guns. That's because on those two issues I did not change my mind. Beginning about 2004 w climate and after 2013 w guns, I just spoke more publicly about views I'd previously advocated more privately within the conservative church.
Carlson has some abusive personal comments about me 2/3 of the way through this complicated excuse and justification for the January 6 attack on the US Capitol. Anti-vax; pro-insurrection - quite a combo. As to the abuse, I'll say just this ... 1/x
I've known Carlson for more than 20 years. We were colleagues at the Weekly Standard in the 1990s, I appeared fairly often on his MSNBC show in the 2000s. We were "Washington friends" - we had lunch, he came to parties at my house, etc. 2/x
All this was during the period of the Afghanistan and Iraq wars. Carlson now proclaims his fierce opposition to both. But *when it mattered* - when his already influential voice could have made a difference to the national decision - he was a FEROCIOUS advocate of both wars. 3/x
By exaggerating the power of China, US policymakers risk harming this country by justifying protectionism and inflating the defense budget beyond reasonable levels. Trump added $100 billion / year in defense spending, most of it aimed at fighting China. theatlantic.com/ideas/archive/…
"Buy American" will cost the US taxpayer another $100 billion a year.
That unnecessary $200 billion could buy a *lot* of more authentic usefulness: carbon reduction, road improvement, cheaper college tuition theatlantic.com/ideas/archive/…
I get that Democratic administrations never want to argue, "The foreign threat of the moment - while real - is less terrifying than out-of-power Republicans say it is."