A fragment form Sakharov's critical response to Solzhenitsyn's "To the Soviet Leaders":
"I am also far from Solzhenitsyn's point of view on the role of Marxism as an allegedly "Western" and anti-religious doctrine, which distorted the healthy Russian line of development.
For me, in general, the very division of ideas into Western and Russian is incomprehensible. In my opinion, with a scientific, rationalistic approach to social and natural phenomena, there is only a division of ideas and concepts into correct and erroneous.
And where is this healthy Russian line of development? Was there really at least one moment in the history of Russia, like any country, when it was able to develop without contradictions and cataclysms?
The fact that Solzhenitsyn writes about ideological ritual, about the harmful waste of time and effort of millions of people on this empty chatter, accustoming them to idle talk and hypocrisy, undoubtedly makes a strong impression,
but the whole point is that this hypocritical chatter plays in our conditions the role of an "oath of allegiance" - it holds the people together with the mutual guarantee of the shared sin of hypocrisy. It, too, is an example of purposeful nonsense generated by the system.
The presentation of the problem of progress in Solzhenitsyn's letter seems to me especially inaccurate. Progress is a global process that is by no means identical, at least in the long term, to the quantitative growth of large-scale and industrial production.
In the conditions of scientific and democratic global regulation of the economy and all social life, including the dynamics of population, this is not a utopia, in my deep conviction, but an urgent necessity.
Progress should continuously and expediently change its specific forms, meeting the needs of human society, necessarily preserving nature and land for our descendants.
Slowdown in scientific research, international scientific relations, technological searches, new farming systems can only postpone the solution of these problems and create critical situations for the world as a whole.

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Andrzej Kozlowski

Andrzej Kozlowski Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @akoz33

23 May
Famous Russian historian Edward Radzinsky talks about how Comrade Stalin had Trotsky expelled from Russia and why. Here is the extraordinary story of Trotsky’s actual ejection. Look how Radzinsky finds it hard not to laugh at the naivety of these revolutionaries. Here is my rough
translation of what he is saying. The best part is the last sentence:
Beloborodov was until the end faithful to Trotsky. At that time he was on vacation and left his apartment to Trotsky. They tricked Trotsky.
Read 14 tweets
21 May
@ARomasze
Yulia Latynina has done what I have been promising to do: inspired by Mark Solonin’s two video analysis of the Smolensk air catastrophe (or perhaps assassination) in which Poland’s President Lech Kaczyński and a large part of Poland’s political & military elite died,
she has now posted the first part of her own analysis under the title “Katyn 2” (same as Solonin’s).

She has studied the original Russian MAK report, two Polish ones and an unpublished supplement to one, plus the anonymous Russian Flanker20 report ,
which formed the basis of Solonin’s analysis. This report was first brought to public attention by Andrei Illarionov, who also has stated that he is convinced that the crash was the result of a bomb and an assassination. Let me remind you that after Mark Solonin’s presented his
Read 13 tweets
20 May
This is correct. @ELuttwak insists it was not a coup because it was not directed at any military operational centers, but then neither were Mussolini’s March on Rome, the beer hall putch, or the so called “October Revolution”, in which the military, thoroughly antagonized by
Kerensky, refused to be involved. In fact, that was true of all these events - in all cases the government could not rely on the military. On January 6th this was not the case, but with Trump & his appointees still in charge at the Pentagon, some certainly thought/hoped that it
would be. Anyway, whether you call it an “attempted coup” or not, it had all the features of “the Keystone Cops try to seize power”. What exactly Trump’s intentions were remains anybody’s guess, but the actors in this farce are now paying the price & quite rightly feel exploited,
Read 5 tweets
21 Apr
Yesterday I listened to the second Mark Solonin talk on the Smolensk air crash that killed President Kaczyński in 2010. After that I could not sleep. This, together with the latest revelations about the GRU operations in the Czech Republic (explosions in Vrbetice) & now Slovakia
plus other recent revelations have drastically changed the way I this event. I used to estimate the chance of foul play in Smolensk at less than 5% now I think it’s over 90%. Solonin is responsible for much of this change: his typically careful analysis, using his knowledge of
aviation engineering, physics and mathematics while avoiding politics as much as possible (he gives an impartial and accurate presentation of the political divisions in Poland, trying not to take sides, although, of course, it is clear that his sympathies lie more with the
Read 24 tweets
19 Apr
I somehow feel compelled to state my view of the American Civil War (although it totally should be completely obvious ...).
I think the Confederacy was a bad cause for one reason only - slavery. That was the true cause of the secession & its original sin from which there is n
no escape. And in fact, the inevitability of what happened and why it had to happen (slavery) was already pointed out a long time earlier by Tocqueville.
But as for secession itself - calling it “treason” is no different that calling any secession treason, including the more
recent breaks up of Czechoslovakia and Yugoslavia. The first was a federation that was entered into by consent & disolved peacefully, the second had a mote complicated origin & was dissolved by civil war. Is secession never justified unless it’s purely consensual? History of much
Read 8 tweets
19 Apr
A fragment fragment from the memoirs of famous Soviet dissident general Petro Grigorienko. Grigirenko’s mother died when he was 3, leaving the father with three young boys and two grandmothers (one permanently unable to walk), and one uncle. The grandmothers arranged for
Petro’s father to marry woman, solely to take care of the 3 kids and work on the farm. She was the daughter of an extremely poor widow, for whom the marriage of daughter was salvation. She had to accept very harsh conditions imposed by the grandmothers - she could not receive
any help from her and see her no more than once a month. The new wife loved her husband and the children and the marriage was successful, except for the two grandmothers, who humiliated her and spoke ill of her at every opportunity. The came WWI. Petro’s father was taken away to
Read 11 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Too expensive? Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal Become our Patreon

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us on Twitter!

:(