Thread by @virendrarathore

There was a dispute in a Hindu family A.
Someone in the family calls an outsider (Hindu) from another family B for help. What help? Counselling? Guidance? Mediation?
No, help was a mercenary who would sit in the camp of the highest bidder.

https://twitter.com/vajrayudha11/status/1396815029975064578

So, he is hired with money, purely to do the bidding of the side who paid (or so it was supposed to be anyway).
Then another person in the family A pulls someone else from family B, obviously he also had to pay. And so on it happens.

Then the fights take place. Family B's mercenaries would often switch sides to whoever paid more, often plunder in the house of family A when demands of money were not met. Demands would go up and ways to squeeze dirtier as mercenaries got more & more entrenched.

Eventually leading to general plunder, murders, extortion.
Later it was claimed that family B was fighting for the Hindu cause and it was family A's fault that they called B for help.

So what if B operated as pure mercenaries & only aggravated the issues. They're still the flag bearers of Hindu cause (don't ask how) and family A are the sellouts among Hindus.
End of story.
People, if this is what sells as hindutva narrative. Happy hindutva to you!