There's a common framing to all of these evangelical "but have you considered NOT deconstructing your way into the exvangelical wilderness?" essays, which is that it is YOUR job -- the individual believer -- to work hard to hang onto your faith in spite of everything
A LOT of evangelical writing takes the form of self-help advice. "Here's how to hang onto your evangelical faith with all this deconstruction going on" comes off with the same energy as "here's how to keep up your exercise routine during the pandemic"
There never seems to be any advice directed toward the people who might be considered spiritual leaders -- like "here's how to council somebody who comes to you with their faith doubts" or "is your church actively driving people away, some things to consider"
There's this presumption that the people currently in the faith -- which, remember, frequently includes people who were raised in it, who never chose to be there -- have some inherent obligation to TRY to stick with the church. That we OWE the church something.
There's a persistent underlying idea that if we left the church, it's because WE failed the church, not because the CHURCH failed us.
Which is offensive in all kinds of ways, but it's also a really good way to ensure that the church never learns anything about why people leave
"These people lost their faith, let's talk about how they screwed up" is not exactly an invitation to an honest, helpful dialog to follow.
"Blame the leaver" messaging is extremely pervasive. Like, "oh, you're just mad at God" -- as if being "mad at God" is some kind of irrational pathology that an emotionally healthy person would be able to overcome.
BUT these same evangelicals also sell their faith as a way to "fix" damaged people so it's not exactly consistent.
"You're damaged, we'll help, join our church!"
"Whoops, you're damaged, our church is too good for you, sorry."
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
This reminds me -- I thought I already wrote a thread about this, but I couldn't find it. When we talk about the various threats to reproductive rights going on in this country --
We often talk about how we're going to BECOME the "Republic of Gilead" from The Handmaid's Tale. My thesis is that we ALREADY ARE the Republic of Gilead.
Similar to where we are on racial justice & equality, sexual justice & equality is a thing we never ACTUALLY ACHIEVED before the fascists started pushing us to go backward.
I'm working on Book 4 & just typed something that made my own emotions go all kablooey, Abby's POV:
"When I think of it now, I’m tempted to tell it differently: to say I left because Father Wisdom was evil, because I wanted to get away from him.
"But that wasn’t the story I told myself at the time. And maybe I couldn’t. Maybe I just wasn’t ready to face the real story yet. It’s really hard to leave a cult you were raised in, but later on it seems ridiculous that it was so hard."
When I typed that last sentence I had a breakdown moment where I couldn't do anything other than sob for a while.
This is a republish of an article that originally had a less attention-grabby but equally evangelical-centric headline: “How to Stay When the World Says Leave”
This is a very common framing for evangelicals, that “the world” somehow exists over THERE, while evangelicals are over HERE being “in the world but not of it”
Reading this, what you see is the inevitable evangelical urge to make sure leavers and critics never get to define themselves, give their own reasons, and have that stand as the narrative.
"They SAY they're leaving for [x] reasons but we don't like those reasons... what if they're just mad at God?"
"To publicly denounce a particular congregation, not to mention a particular denomination (not to mention an entire faith tradition), because of how people behaved is to misunderstand what Christianity is."
But what is Christianity, if it's not made up of Christians?
I'd never heard of this particular dude before, but the overall outlines of this narrative, "I converted to Catholicism as an adult and now think the US should be run as a Catholic theocratic dictatorship" are oddly common thedailybeast.com/new-york-post-…
“My moral opinions were as interchangeable as my clothing styles and musical tastes,” the 36-year-old Ahmari [..] writes in his latest book, The Unbroken Thread: Discovering the Wisdom of Tradition in an Age of Chaos."
Well, guess what, dude, my moral opinions have been pretty solid since I was a little kid, and I'm older than you, and I say "traditional" patriarchal religions can suck it.
BEHOLD MY AWESOME POWER
I AM THE FLAME AND THE DARKNESS
ALL SHALL LOVE ME AND DESPAIR
He's not even wrong, I DO hate all those things, because I know that all those things are examples of patriarchy, and I hate patriarchy.
"Creation order" == patriarchy
"Biblical manhood" == patriarchy
"God-centered family" == patriarchy