i literally just saw "pride isn't about sex" and i feel like i'm in an AU. people like me were still being called "sodomites" pretty regularly and publicly while i was growing up and that wasn't that long ago, what the fuck is happening here
look i just think pride should be for the LGBTQs. Lesbians, General motors, Bank of america, Teenagers, and Qalmart
we had to have a fucking supreme court case saying you can't actually put people in Literal Goddamned Jail for having gay sex. that's in living memory of every adult in the fucking country because if it were a person, it wouldn't be old enough to vote yet!!
google has been around for longer than gay sex has been legal in all of america. when super mario sunshine was released, a man could be arrested for having sex with another man in the US.
they put us in cages, man. and that was an improvement. the uk government castrated alan turing, the father of computing, which drove him to suicide. because he was with another dude.
this is borderline revisionism. how dare you try to pretend sex has nothing to do with this
i don't know how to make it any fucking clearer than this:
"don't hold hands with your boyfriend in public, we all know you have sex with him"
→
"don't wear your pup hood in public, we all know you have sex in it"
Haha but if you're straight there are tons of cute little tropes about when and where you fucked, and that's fine! sex hair, wearing the same clothes the next morning, "quickie", "mile high club", on and on
this is all so infuriating, i am dying to talk about something else
"but the leather stuff is /weird/" YEAH THAT'S WHAT THEY SAID ABOUT ALL OF US KAREN. THAT'S THE ENTIRE FUCKING POINT. THAT'S WHAT /I/ GOT EXPOSED TO AS A YOUNG QUEER: HOW NASTY AND UNNATURAL THEY THINK QUEER SEX IS, AND HOW IT'S ALL THEY THINK ABOUT WHEN THEY SEE US
BUT HEAVEN FUCKING FORBID YOUR KID SEE SOMEONE DRESSED IN A WAY THAT'S THREE DEGREES AWAY FROM ANY ACTUAL SEX AND /NOT/ SEE THEM BEING PERSECUTED FOR IT I GUESS. THAT WOULD BE A DISASTER, THEY MIGHT NOT GROW UP TO BE A JUDGMENTAL SHITHEAD LIKE YOU
NO COPS AT PRIDE
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
i cannot verify this, but i've been told that the push to shorten "polyamorous" to "polyam" rather than "poly" (so polynesian people can use the latter) traces back to a single tumblr post essentially arguing that having a single word mean two things would be bad SEO
folks i have bad news about what comes up when you just google "poly" on its own
i, the genius, am attempting to look into this /after/ tweeting about it, and i guess this was the original post? i tracked it down on wayback machine and it's not a snippet, that one paragraph was the entire post (via aidamanduley.com/2015/09/01/sto…)
i never saw ds9 so i've been gradually going through it over the past months and wow it is good, a star trek with ongoing stakes where the federation kind of sucks sometimes, what the hell
i'm like halfway through season 6. worf and dax are pretty cute! i sure hope nothing happens to them! either of them! especially dax!!
can anyone have a stable relationship that isn't fucked up though. i feel like the most stable thing in this whole series was bashir and leeta doing their breakup party
one of the big unspoken issues underlying "kink at pride" discourse seems to be that a lot of people assume "kink" is an objective category, and anyone engaging in a "kink" is therefore horny at all times and basically fucking right in front of you
but this is incredibly weird to me because i immediately think of MOST OF WESTERN MEDIA and how it's built around male gaze and the women have to be sufficiently attractive to straight men and then we dress them in as little as possible
and i am not really clear on how this is different from "kink"?
media depiction of women is quite clearly meant to be sexually appealing to cishet men. that doesn't mean every dude pops an immediate boner upon witnessing catwoman
really hate media that pulls out "you're here for a reason" or whatever, when narratively that is literally untrue. even moreso hate that it always works. feels like just a deeply manipulative way to say "i want you to do this, therefore do it"
see also "you can't escape your destiny" where "destiny" is something the speaker is entirely pulling out of their ass because it sounds good to them
no one ever pushes back against these, either, and it is deeply unsettling
Big Bad: You were fated to come here, just as you are fated to die by my hand
me: i wasn't fated to do jack and you don't know dick about fuck. go fuck yourself with this weak garbage, you're not convincing me you're some prophet by foretelling things i've already fucking done
kind of devastated by the genres of replies here
- "bitcoin, it's an investment for my children"
- "bitcoin because it only goes up"
- "cash because i need groceries"
this paints a stark picture of speculators taking advantage of people who are borderline desperate and not otherwise familiar with investing ("if graph goes up and to the right, it always will")
long suspected this of course but you don't overtly see it deep in bitcoin twitter
not dunking on anyone here btw, since "if graph goes up and to the right, it always will" is also a deeply-held belief of VCs and other incredibly rich people involved in finance who are inexplicably terrible at math