First up, Rick Gates proffer agreement detailing CA's "psychological polling," integration with Conway and Fabrizio, and sensitive information Rick Gates passed along to Konstantin Kilimnik.
Compare these two: Redactions removed in later release shows Steve Bannon and Roger Stone's attempts to raise $20 million perhaps for a Cambridge Analytica project.
Maybe Nix or Kaiser underneath the redacted names.
Connection here on this Rick Gates proffer to SSCI Vol 5 which mentions CA testing messaging on Russian key words such as "Putin." Appears to be some work done by CA on "foreign influence" matters.
"Bannon's role in CA and his financial stake in the Cayman Islands." via Rick Gates proffer. Also, more evidence of data sharing agreements between Data Trust and CA questions the firewall between PAC and campaign.
Highly redacted emails between Steve Bannon and what appears to be Alexander Nix. Note the subject of one email though: "Subject: Defeat Crooked Hillary | ASSANGE"
THREAD: Yesterday's upgraded @USTreasury Dept sanctions against Russian agent Konstantin Kilimnik confirm what we knew all along, that #CambridgeAnalytica engaged with Russian intel services (indirectly or directly) for the benefit of the Trump Campaign in 2016. I'll say it
[1/3]
FOIA challenges from @JasonLeopold helped to reveal that #CambridgeAnalytica's psychological polling was lumped together for the Trump campaign and then Paul Manafort instructed Rick Gates to pass that information along to Russian operative Konstantin Kilimnik [2/3]
This sentence from SSCI report gets overlooked. The "degree of intersection" with Russia and CA was more than just Kilimnik but he was the conduit for it all.
Sam Patten claimed that Kilimnik had no relationship with CA...said the guy who was deleting files the FBI wanted [3/3]
Testimony from Elizabeth Denham of the @ICOnews to the @CommonsDCMS as it relates to the investigation of Cambridge Analytica | A THREAD ⬇️
First up, Ms. Denham says the Senate Intelligence Committee did not contact the ICO despite the SSCI in the their report saying they did.
Denham fails to specify what changed between April 2019 and October 2020 for there not to be a final report issued. Over 700 TB of information analyzed and the @ICOnews chose not to issue a final report on an almost 2 year investigation. @carolecadwalla@jason_kint@EmmaLBriant
Denham says that she's happy to provide a "private briefing" into the AIQ/Cambridge Analytica agreement after @OwnYourDataNow published documents with the letterhead "Cambridge Analytica in partnership with AIQ"
Yesterday, the Central Bureau of Investigation in India registered a case against #CambridgeAnalytica and GSR for misusing Facebook data. The Bureau alleges only 335 people installed the app yet 562k people had their data harvested.
The poster of The Indian National Congress party in Alexander Nix's office as seen in @thegreathackdoc has been the source of much debate in India (according to reports) over which parties Cambridge Analytica worked for. opindia.com/2021/01/cbi-fi…
According to testimony/evidence provided by @chrisinsilico to the DCMS, Cambridge Analytica worked for Congress. SCL did work regionally in India.
@podehaye said: Dan Muresan was working for Congress but he was really paid for by an Indian billionaire who wanted Congress to lose
For context @JasonLeopold obtained Kaiser's 302 in August of 2020. It's entirely redacted. ALL pages in the Mueller report related to #CambridgeAnalytica and any potential Russian connection is redacted. ICO in the UK referred Russia connection to the NCA