'Build rapport' is at the heart of #communication skills training and #CX
It's obviously good to have good conversations, but what does ‘building rapport’ look like ‘in the wild’ – and does it 'work'?
1. Thread. 🧵
2. What actually counts as rapport building – in terms of words and phrases and 'tone of voice' – is "amorphous” and “nebulous”, says G.B. Rubin (2016) in her thesis on crisis #negotiation
'Active listening' and related concepts sound good but they're also imprecise.
3. One common piece of advice (and instruction) to ‘build rapport’ is to ask, “how are you today?”
‘How are you’ have also been called “the three most useless words in the world of communication"🤔
Let’s have a look at some salespeople ‘building rapport’ in #B2B conversations.
4. This is a 'cold' telephone call between a salesperson and prospective client from a series of studies by me, @BogdanaHuma & @rein_ove.
The goal is to get an appointment with a new client. The salesperson responds to a non-existent "how are you" from the prospective client 🙄
5. Here's another #B2B sales call that looks very similar. The salesperson isn't listening. The prospective client doesn't want to 'build rapport'.
6. In this #B2B call, the salesperson IS listening. He hears the lack of reciprocation from the prospective client (who does not ask 'how are you' in return) and moves to the reason for calling - and gets the appointment in the end.
7. In this case the call is between a salesperson and an EXISTING client – someone that he doesn’t need to ‘build rapport’ with. He doesn’t ask ‘how are you’ and gets straight to business. But, as he is talking to someone he knows, the client expects to exchange ‘how are yous’ 😬
8. Asking someone you have not previously encountered “how are you today” does not build rapport.
Like the previous #B2B cold calls, this university call-taker replies (after a delay) to the student's “how are you” but does not return the question.
9. Here’s a thread on why the statement that that ‘how are you’ are “the three most useless words in the world of communication” is wrong.
But 'how are you' doesn't ‘build rapport’ either - because you can’t build rapport on your own 🗨️🗨️
10. It’s not just salespeople who both try to build rapport and don’t listen properly. Here’s a call to the vet’s. The caller wants to know how much it would cost to get injections for her puppy. While some pet owners want lots of "puppy chat", this one just wants the price...
11. ... as we (@MagnusHamann) show, the call goes *on and on and on* before getting to a price. And just because the caller says "brilliant" and "lovely" doesn't mean things are "brilliant" or "lovely" and the caller turns down an appointment when offered.
No rapport built.
12. In fact, ‘building rapport’ can take just ONE turn.
Here’s two ways that a customer gets to use a café’s WiFi. In both cases, the café has WiFi so the outcome is the same. But in one, the customer has to push the request, while in the other, they don't even have to ask.
13. In our research on crisis negotiation, @rein_ove and I found that explicit expressions of 'care' were often rejected the persons in crisis ("You don't care, you're just doing your job"). In this case, behind-the-scenes advice to express care does not go well.
14. Yet, in this final example, the negotiator can ONLY risk saying to the person in crisis that she's "talking to him cos she has to" because she really does 'have rapport'. Moments later, the person in crisis comes down safely.
15. In sum:
It’s obvious when someone is doing ‘building rapport.’ People can spot it a mile off.
'Rapport' is the OUTCOME of an effective encounter.
And it is RECIPROCAL - you can't 'have rapport' on your own.
Despite being "the magic word", @AndrewChalfoun @gio_rossi_5 @tanya_stivers show in their recent #EMCA conference paper that "please" appears in <10% of actual requests and does *other* things.
It's another #communication myth busted.
🧵 1/8
2/8
It becomes very clear if/when you listen to and analyse recordings of actual "in the wild" social interaction (the data used in conversation analytic research) that people make their requests sound 'polite', 'pushy', 'tentative', etc., through a variety of words and phrases.
3/8
(...and, btw, despite the enduring nature of such claims in (pop) communication & some psych & linguistics, so-called 'tentative' or 'polite' requests are NOT gendered, as pretty much any #EMCA research on requesting shows - often as an artefact if not the focus...).
Great to see “signage and ratings”, “awareness”, and “visible assurance” prominent in @RAEngNews@CIBSE recommendations to ensure that the public understands the importance of “good indoor air quality.”
Between Oct 21-March 22 @IndependentSage and colleagues worked on a project to design, pilot, and evaluate a scheme to convey, in a non-technical way, #ventilation information ('scores / signs on the doors') for rooms, buildings, and venues. 3/8
I haven’t transcribed Johnson for a while (too😡) but for the records here are his responses to Susanna Reid's questions about #Elsie, which include placing a definitive-sounding "no" after Reid suggests "you can't say anything to help Elsie, can you."
Part 1: Opening question:
Part 2, in which Johnson produces incomplete responses, cut off and abandoned sentences, rushed-through turns, deviations, and stated intentions - but does not provide examples of what Elsie "should cut back on".
Part 3, in which Reid repeats her initial question (at line 47); Johnson repeats his earlier answer (line 49); resists addressing Reid's factual challenges, and ends up placing that "no" at line 65 - he can't say anything to help Elsie because "we" are focusing on supply.
What can we learn from the #language of “living with covid”?
We wrote about the origins of “living with it”; how it became associated with Covid-19, and how – like other idiomatic phrases – it closes down discussion (“just live with it!”)
2. We searched on @LexisNexisUK for the first use, first use in association with Covid-19, and frequency of use, of twelve variations of ‘living with it’ and ‘learning to live with it’, up to the start of 2022.
It’s clear that ‘live/living’ outpaced ‘learn/learning’ versions.
3. Here are some examples from Lexis Nexis.
For each iteration of the phrase, we looked at the date and quote of the first (non-covid) mention; number of hits/mentions (to end December 2021); first Covid-19 mention, and an exemplar recent Covid-19 mention.
What evidence is there that “using these 8 common phrases” will “ruin your credibility”?
Answer: Not much.
Why do we create and perpetuate #communication myths? Communication is important, and we don't see enough of how it works “in the wild.”
🧵Thread 1/12
The thread is informed by research in conversation analysis #EMCA
There are other research methods for investigating communication, but not all look at actual humans producing, for instance, those “8 common phrases” in social interaction.
That’s what this thread will do. 2/12
The thread gives examples of the “8 common phrases” being used.
As @DerekEdwards23 says, if data-free assertions (advice, theories, models) don’t account for actual interaction, there’s a problem.
Judge for yourself whether the phrases undermine speaker credibility. 3/12
After last week's focus on the science of mechanical and natural #ventilation, today's @IndependentSage briefing focused on its translation into a non-technical #communication#messaging 'proof of concept' scheme.
3. NB. Ventilation is complex - as is making decisions about the behavioural mitigations needed following the assessment of any given space - so any such scheme must be underpinned by ventilation and aerosol expertise ...