Share this page!

Yuri Deigin Profile picture
Twitter logo
27 May, 4 tweets, 2 min read
Hey @WSJ, ever heard of Huang Yanling? Please don’t say that’s a crazy conspiracy theory, cause so was the lab leak until about 10 minutes ago.

washingtonpost.com/opinions/globa…
1.
2.
3.

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
　

Keep Current with Yuri Deigin

Yuri Deigin Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @ydeigin

Yuri Deigin Profile picture
28 May
Sure let’s do this math exercise.

Say, you have 10000 “trees”. The COVID fire is approaching and will get 50% of them if you do nothing. 

If you vaccinate them, that 50% is reduced by 95% to 2.5%, so only 250 trees will catch fire instead of 5000.

1/6
The trees that do catch fire will have, say, a 2% mortality if you don’t use IVM or if IVM can reduce mortality by 83%, a 0.34% mortality. 

Of course, nothing is preventing you to use IVM on the vaccinated trees if you believe in its power to reduce mortality.

2/6
But for the sake of the argument, let’s say we don’t. What is the difference in deaths under the exclusive scenarios of vaccinated vs. IVMed?

So 250 trees caught fire, and 2% or 5 trees will die. 245 will survive but might be scarred by Covid. 

3/6
Read 6 tweets
Yuri Deigin Profile picture
25 May
Just so that we’re clear — I am not saying we should dismiss any COVID vaccine concerns. Absolutely not! We should debate any potential issues and closely monitor any actual ones. So far there do seem some rare minor issues and ultra-rare major ones (deaths, clots).

1/5
Not all vaccines are equal. Some are better than others. I am a huge fan of mRNA ones, I fully admit. I’ve been a fan of mRNA technology for many years (back when it was just invented/considered for use in Yamanaka factors delivery which are my main passion).

2/5
Vaccines seem like a perfect fit for the mRNA technology, especially in a pandemic where you need very quickly adapt to novel strains. I actually hope we can squeak by without new boosters, but for that we need a coordinated world-wide effort to eradicate SARS2 ASAP.

3/5
Read 5 tweets
Yuri Deigin Profile picture
24 May
Waaaait a minute 😁

So some COVID vaccine alarmist have been quoting the study by @manorlaboratory out of Salk that SARS2 spike alone can cause cell damage. But that’s not what the study has shown!

1/4
Those were not lone spike proteins, those were HIV-like virions encoding SARS2 spike. I.e. entered the cells expressing ACE2 and once inside expressed their proteins and maybe even integrated into cell genome (not sure if they used integrase-deficient retroviruses or not).

2/4
Maybe the confusion is due to the lax wording by the popular science article describing the study:

3/4
Read 4 tweets
Yuri Deigin Profile picture
23 May
AAA SNAKES ON A PLANE, I mean
SPIKES IN MY BRAIN AAA!!!

The latest Covid vaccine fear is that spike proteins produced by the vaccine will get out of the cells, get into the bloodstream, and travel to the brain causing prion-like pathology.

1/4
While there are some data that free-floating spike proteins (or just their fragments) seem to be detected in the blood the first couple of days after vaccination, the amounts detected are minuscule, around 70 pg/mL. A picogram is 1e-12 gram.

2/4
Moreover, free-floating spikes cannot get inside cells on their own, and even if they could, any potential prion-like effects of spikes are pure conjecture at this point: nothing of sort has yet been observed — neither in vitro or in vivo.

3/4
Read 4 tweets
Yuri Deigin Profile picture
18 May
1/7
Ok let’s try to estimate our annual risk of contracting COVID. We have these nice CDC data from when there were just 15M cases in the US (after about 6 months of the pandemic). Now it’s 33M, icymi.
2/7
Let’s look at the 40-64 age group. We have 5M cases out of ~100M ppl, i.e. a 5% incidence in 6 mo/15M cases, which I think we can extrapolate to 10M cases out of 30M/12mo. => annual risk of 10% for people aged 40-64.

Quick sanity check: 33M cases out of 330M is also 10%.
3/7
Now, what is the risk of death for people aged 40-64 who got COVID? Well, we got about 0.1M dead out of about 10M infected, which means a nice round CFR of 1%.
Read 7 tweets
Yuri Deigin Profile picture
10 Apr
1/n

Ok, let me try and harp on my evolutionary, well, harp 😂 And maybe my favorite EvoBio couple, @HeatherEHeying and @BretWeinstein can smack me on the head if say something dumb.

So basically infectivity and virulence/pathogenicity are two different properties of a virus,
2/n
which *might* be correlated but do not have to be. First of all, we must understand: these little viruses are not out to kill us. All they “want” is to replicate. And want is in quotes because of course they don’t have any agency:
3/n
they are just a self-replicating collection of molecules, set in motion by some random LUCA prime mover billions of years ago. So the pathogenicity/virulence of a virus is really an unwanted side-effect for both parties:
Read 11 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!

This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Too expensive? Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal Become our Patreon

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us on Twitter!

Like this author's thread?

Get emails when @ydeigin has new unrolls!

Check out other threads from @ydeigin!

Read all threads by @ydeigin

:(