John Bye Profile picture
27 May, 11 tweets, 5 min read
The government seems to have published a shelved PHE study today just to defend Matt Hancock against accusations by Dominic Cummings about discharging patients from hospitals to care homes without testing them for covid.

And the study is flawed, due to that very lack of testing!
It's been widely assumed that many deaths in care homes in the first wave were caused by patients being discharged from hospital without being tested. A policy that continued until April 15th.

This issue was raised by Cummings in his testimony yesterday.

dailymail.co.uk/news/article-9…
The study looks at this issue and claims it only caused 286 deaths.

It was conveniently published today, just in time for Jenny Harries to reference in a press conference.

But it's dated April 2021.

And it's clear it was actually written last autumn!

gov.uk/government/pub…
The report talks about data for the last six weeks (up to October 12th!) being undercounted due to "delays in reporting".

The conclusion even says it should be "re-assessed in November and December"!

It's not clear if this was done. Or why they sat on the report for 7 months.
Maybe because the study is flawed?

Understandably it only counts outbreaks, cases and deaths confirmed by testing.

But early on care homes struggled to get tests at all, and those that did were rationed to testing the first 5 residents with symptoms.

bbc.co.uk/news/uk-522896…
So data for the first wave, which is when most seeding from hospitals took place, is very incomplete, and will underestimate cases.

Which would be fine, except they've defined the first wave as everything up to October 12th! Well into the second wave for the North and Midlands.
This means they're mixing data from when seeding from hospitals was most likely to have taken place but there was almost no testing in care homes, and data from when there should have been very little seeding but care homes were being routinely tested.

Which will skew the data.
To give an idea of the possible scale of the problem, the study identifies 5,882 lab confirmed outbreaks up to October 12th.

But the last PHE care home outbreak report (which also includes suspected outbreaks) already showed 6,811 by July 19th.

gov.uk/government/sta…
So both the number of care home outbreaks and the number of cases and deaths associated with each one is significantly undercounted for the period when most seeding took place.

But not in later data when patients were being tested before discharge, reducing seeding.
As the study averages things out over the entire pandemic, up to the point when it was really written in October, the proportion of care home deaths and outbreaks caused by hospital discharges in the ACTUAL first wave will be FAR higher than the 2% it quotes for the "first wave".
It's hard to interpret this as anything other than dusting off an old report that's been sitting on a shelf for the last seven months and publishing it purely to provide dubious cover for Matt Hancock in today's press conference. 🙄

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with John Bye

John Bye Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @_johnbye

26 May
Assuming any of this is true (it is Dominic Cummings, after all), it paints a pretty damning picture of a government hopelessly unprepared and woefully unsuited to dealing with a serious emergency.

dailymail.co.uk/news/article-9…
For starters, apparently the Prime Minister and others were convinced the whole thing was overblown, and that the economic damage from acting would be worse than the death toll from doing nothing.

They saw it as another Swine Flu.

They were wrong.
Once they got past that, herd immunity WAS the initial policy, because they didn't see any alternative. Either 260,000 people die in the spring (the "optimal" strategy!) or even more die in the winter.

He claims there was even talk of asking people to intentionally get infected!
Read 11 tweets
23 May
PHE's study on vaccine effectiveness against the Indian B.1.617.2 variant is out, clarifying figures leaked to the FT yesterday.

It confirms the 1st dose is less effective against B.1.617.2, but the 2nd dose still gives similar protection. However...

gov.uk/government/new…
As @fascinatorfun pointed out, the FT figures mixed data from both Pfizer and AstraZeneca jabs.

The study breaks it down by vaccine and, on the face of it, isn't good news for AstraZeneca (ChAdOx1).

But they do say this may be partly due to 2nd jabs starting later for AZ.
Data for both vaccines on preventing symptomatic cases is similar 21+ days after the first dose -

Pfizer:
49% protection vs B.1.1.7
33% protection vs B.1.617.2

AstraZeneca:
51% protection vs B.1.1.7
33% protection vs B.1.617.2

So about a third less effective against B.1.617.2
Read 9 tweets
22 May
Handy thread on vaccine protection against variants.

First dose seems to be significantly less effective against the B.1.617.2 (Indian) variant.

Second dose still provides excellent protection against both the B.1.1.7 (Kent) and B.1.617.2 variants though.
Looking at how effective vaccines are at stopping you from catching covid and developing symptoms -

1st dose:
51% protection against B.1.1.7
33% protection against B.1.617.2

2nd dose:
87% protection against B.1.1.7
81% protection against B.1.617.2

But it's worth remembering that the vaccines also make you less likely to die or become severely ill if you *do* catch covid.

While we don't have data yet on how this translates to B.1.617.2, there's no evidence it's more deadly than other strains.

Read 5 tweets
20 May
Update on the situation in Bolton, courtesy of the covid dashboard.

First up, cases are still rising rapidly. Daily case numbers are almost back to the peak they reached during the second wave that hit the North West hard in the autumn.

coronavirus.data.gov.uk/details/cases?… Image
This is despite 65% of Bolton's adult population now having had one vaccine dose and 37% having had both.

Not far behind the national average (70% / 40%).

coronavirus.data.gov.uk/details/vaccin… Image
Probably at least in part thanks to vaccinations, infection rates are still relatively low amongst the over 60s.

But they are now clearly rising.

Note: this data is a few days older than the raw case numbers, so the rates will be even higher now.

coronavirus.data.gov.uk/details/cases?… Image
Read 7 tweets
16 May
It says a lot that so many politicians and their friends saw the pandemic as a get rich quick scheme.

In this case a disgraced former MP working with an organic dog food company owner (!) to broker a deal with a Hong Kong company, which itself seems to be a middleman. 🙄
Former Tory MP Brooks Newmark emailed Hancock to ask for his help to "make this happen".

Newmark had quit in 2014 after sending explicit photos to an undercover journalist who he thought was a young activist.

Not his first sext, it later emerged.

google.com/amp/s/www.bbc.…
He was lobbying on behalf of Zoe Ley, a former investment banker turned dog food company owner.

She setup a new company in May 2020 which helped broker two PPE deals, worth a total of £258m.

The BBC thinks she personally made over £1m from this.

google.com/amp/s/www.bbc.…
Read 9 tweets
15 May
"Decent hard working folk who aren't covid deniers", at the anti-lockdown protest in London today.

There's someone with a giant Q sign right in the middle of this shot. 🙄
More here, marching alongside covid crank Professor Fenton (who thinks the second wave was mostly false positives).

Pretty much an A to Z of conspiracy theories - QAnon, world government, eugenics, depopulation, child sex rings, microchipping people...

Meanwhile in Canterbury, disgraced former scientist Michael Yeadon (who thinks proposed covid booster shots may be a plot to depopulate the Earth) is addressing people in a park with a PA system.

Having recently complained that he wasn't able to do this.

Read 4 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Too expensive? Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal Become our Patreon

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us on Twitter!

:(