"Australia's federal Health Minister Greg Hunt has rejected any suggestion that he & his medical college advisers have endorsed the 'affirmative' treatment model of children’s hospital gender clinics." 1/ theaustralian.com.au/nation/politic…
"He was responding to Monday’s @AustralianStory program, in which the general medicine director of Royal Children’s Hospital Melbourne, Sarah McNab, claimed a 2020 medical college report to Mr Hunt was 'incredibly validating' for the hospital’s influential gender clinic."
"Victoria’s Health Minister Martin Foley was quoted (by @ABCaustralia as saying) he had to 'give Greg Hunt and the federal government kudos' for letting the medical college @TheRACP 'determine the outcome'."
"But Mr Hunt told @australian he had 'not endorsed any particular model or approach to the treatment of children and adolescents with gender dysphoria'." There is rising international concern about the puberty blockers & cross-sex hormone drugs given to minors at gender clinics.
The ABC made no mention of Mr Hunt's 2020 request for the states to "develop an evidence-based national approach" to under-18 gender care, & the program gives viewers the impression Mr Hunt & the RACP have settled the gender clinic debate. No sign yet of new national approach.
The ABC denies it has misrepresented the minister, saying: "At no point did Australian Story suggest the federal minister for health had endorsed anything other than the need not to have a national inquiry into the treatment of gender dysphoria in children and young people".
A news.com.au write-up of the ABC program states: "A review of the (@RCHMelbourne affirmative gender clinic) by the RACP has since recommended that similar services be established around Australia". False, but not surprising the reporter was misled.
"The hormonal drug treatments of the gender clinics rest on a weak evidence base according to multiple systematic reviews, including a world-first review involving Dr Ken Pang, who is head of research at Dr Telfer's gender clinic." abc.net.au/austory/statem…
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
.@GDSNsupport holds online support meetings for family & friends of those affected by gender dysphoria. It was founded in 2020 by a therapist & two mums of natal daughters who identify as trans. The group is looking for more therapists as demand rises. 1/
In the last 2 years there's been a surge of new groups driven by concern about gender clinic medicine. They cover parents, health professionals, detransitioners, LGB people, trans care consumers & trans adults worried about the risks to minors. Here's a sample of this new push:
"We petition the American Academy of Pediatrics to renounce its scientifically unsupported 'affirmative' policy for young people with gender dysphoria." Interesting petition given role of guidelines/policies in promoting gender hormone drugs & surgery. 1/ change.org/p/american-aca…
Gender clinic hormonal treatments for under-18s are based on "low quality" evidence, according to reviews of the medical literature, including the first systematic review by Chew et al 2018 published in the AAP's official journal. blogs.bmj.com/bmjebmspotligh…
In the absence of high quality evidence for gender medicine, treatment guidelines & position statements from medical associations take on more significance -- and they have their critics.
"(Victoria's anti-conversion therapy bill), which could mean up to a decade in jail or fines of almost $10,000 for anyone found trying to suppress or change another person’s sexuality or gender identity, passed by 27-9 votes late on Thursday." 1/ theaustralian.com.au/nation/politic…
Not a surprise, given the numbers. More significant, I think, was hearing several Australian MPs literate in the Tavistock court ruling, risks to minors in "affirmative" gender clinics, questions of consent to gender transition, & the emergence of regretful "detransitioners".
In the debate, some MPs, notably Liberal Democrat David Limbrick, tried to tease out the logic & possible consequences of this use of coercive state power. What does it mean to "change or suppress" sexuality or gender identity? He worried aloud about real-world scenarios.
"Overcoming the flesh: the transgender movement wants to legally abolish physical sex. Risks and side effects are kept silent" | Big-hit 1400-word report in Germany's influential centre-right newspaper Frankfurter Allgemeine @faznet#GenderClinics 1/ zeitung.faz.net/faz/feuilleton…
"(The @FDP party & Greens) have presented drafts for a (gender) self-determination law that for long stretches seem as if they were written by the activists themselves. At age 14, everyone should be able to decide each year whether they are legally to be considered man or woman."
Germany is the latest country to launch a dissident LGB group in protest & alarm at what they see as the capture of establishment LGBT organisations by the radical project to topple biological sex & erect self-declared "gender identity" in its place.
"Doctors and psychiatrists want the Andrews government (in the Australian state of Victoria) to make changes to its plan to ban gay conversion therapy, due to concerns it will discourage some practitioners from treating vulnerable patients." theage.com.au/politics/victo…
This is significant criticism from the main medical body @amavictoria & college of psychiatry @RANZCP, which calls out the conflation of sexual orientation & gender identity that is the hallmark of activist-driven "conversion therapy" bans globally.
This concern raised by the college's Victorian branch is also interesting because the RANZCP's own policy arguably involves a more general, Queer Theory-style conflation of sexual orientation & gender identity. ranzcp.org/news-policy/po…
Two courts on the opposite side of the world recently made decisions on children & puberty blocker drugs which stop natural development. In the English case, the High Court said it was "highly unlikely" that a child 13 or under could consent to this "experimental" treatment. 1/
In Australia, the court decided it was in the "best interests" of a 12 year-old to begin puberty blockers to prevent "life-long damaging masculinisation". Born a boy, the child identifies as female.
Both rulings came down in December 2020 but a key difference is that the English court was considering whether children could give informed consent to their own treatment, while the Australian judge allowed doctors to proceed with the mother consenting on behalf of the child.