NEW: @Claire_Bushey & I analyzed allegations of police misconduct from three US cities (Chicago, NYC, Philly), and I have organized the #rstats DATA+CODE in a GitHub repo ⚡️⚡️⚡️

github.com/Financial-Time…

The @FT STORY:
ft.com/content/141182…

*THREAD* about the data
1/ To begin, here's an old-school chart from the Christopher Commission's independent investigation of the LAPD in 1991, after the police beating of Rodney King

The report found that the top 10% of officers w/misconduct complaints against them accounted for 28% of ALL complaints A chart from the Christopher Commission 1991 report showing
2/ ... over a 4yr pd. 30yrs later, this overall pattern—which the Commission called "remarkable and disturbing"—still holds true today in Chicago, NYC, & Philly

The 10% of officers named most often in civilian complaints against police drew ~ a third of all the complaints Bar charts showing the distribution of misconduct complaints
3/ You might be wondering why we didn't include more cities, like Minnesota, where Derek Chauvin generated 17 complaints during his 19yrs on the force (1 led to discipline) before being fired & convicted for the murder of George Floyd

Answer: THE POLICE DON'T RELEASE THE DATA
4/ Police misconduct & disciplinary records are *not* publicly available in most cities, and in Chicago+NYC, years-long court battles have ensued over this data. Our analysis for those cities was made possible by @invinst & @nyclu

cpdp.co
nyclu.org/en/campaigns/n…
5/ Note on NYC: in March the Civilian Complaint Review Board & NYPD released some complaints data (not as many fields as @NYCLU has)—*after* the Jun 2020 repeal of 50-A, a statute shielding officer records

www1.nyc.gov/site/ccrb/poli…
nypdonline.org/link/1026

nytimes.com/2021/03/08/nyr…
6/ Another NYC note: @propublica also obtained data on civilian complaints from the CCRB; we used @NYCLU's since they included a broader subset (ProPublica's only has officers who had at least one substantiated complaint)

projects.propublica.org/nypd-ccrb/
7/ Philadelphia, OTOH, is one of the few major cities in the country whose police department *does* release this data in a machine-readable format, on @opendataphilly

opendataphilly.org/dataset/police…
8/ One drawback is that Philly's data is released on a trailing basis, meaning older data is overwritten by newly-released data 😐😐😐

HT @sam_learner for sharing the data behind his amazing @puddingviz project so we could use info dating back to 2015 pudding.cool/2020/10/police…
9/ That's why we chose Chicago, NYC & Philly for our story. So what does it mean for complaints to have such a skewed distribution? A couple of thoughts:
10/ First, is this proof of the "few bad apples" idea?

It's not that simple for a few reasons. Police, for their part, often counter that "problem officers" are actually "productive officers" — they work in most dangerous areas, make the most arrests, etc.
11/ Criminologist @RJohnkane disagrees, & says that "if you're going to contact 'risky people' on a regular basis, you should eventually become really good at it without generating complaints"

So from both these perspectives, the "bad apples" analogy is flawed
12/ Also, research from @_georgewood @droithmayr @AVPapachristos suggests that misconduct can spread—officers with high levels of complaints could draw colleagues into “misconduct networks”

Here's an example #dataviz from one police district in Chicago
journals.sagepub.com/doi/full/10.11… Network graphic showing officers from a single Chicago polic
13/ “The idea that it’s just ‘bad apples’ always forgets the rest of the analogy. Bad apples spoil the bunch,” said @AVPapachristos, adding that good as well as bad behavior can be transmitted within groups
14/ Second, only a tiny share of misconduct complaints (single digit %s, if that) resulted in discipline. Why?

There's lots to unpack here!
15/ It's impt to note that we canNOT make *direct* comparisons between cities because each city records & investigates complaints differently, and the scope of the data obtained from each city is different as well
16/ I learned *a lot* about this, and have tried to document as much of it as possible in the GitHub repo for future researchers, including on this table

HT @anfan @invinst for answering a *deluge* of Qs about Chicago

github.com/Financial-Time… a tabular representation of the differences in the raw data
17/ In NYC, for instance, civilian complaints are investigated by the civilian complaint review board* but the police commissioner has the final say over discipline

*if they fall under certain categories (FADO: www1.nyc.gov/site/ccrb/abou…)

See: projects.propublica.org/nypd-unchecked… by @ericuman
18/ That's the case with most cities that have a civilian review agency — ultimately they make recommendations to the police dept, which decides whether & what discipline to impose

(In Philly, complaints are investigated by the police department's own internal affairs bureau)
19/ Like I said, lots to unpack about the differences between different cities.

S/O to @TooMuchMe & the Badge Watch project w/ @CodeForMiami —an app & website that tracks Miami PD officer complaints

badgewatch.org

20/ We couldn't include Miami bc the scope of its data was too different from the other cities; however, a preliminary analysis found similar trends. For ex, one Miami officer has 40+ complaints!
21/ There are ~ a million things I want to explore in the data but wasn't able to, but maybe you can!

Pls check out our GitHub repo & LMK if you have Qs. My nerdy heart will rejoice to know that sharing the data & code has been useful 🤓

github.com/Financial-Time…
22/ *Extra* Another thing I've thought about *a lot*, from a philosophical standpoint, is whether this kind of skewed distribution is an inevitable ~ statistical pattern ~, like the bell curve for height or grades ...

23/ ... in other words, even if a police department significantly reduced civilian complaints, would the distribution still hold true in perpetuity, in the sense that there will always be these "problem" officers at the tail end? 🤔
24/ I spoke to experts about this, including @RJohnkane (who studied NYPD extensively with James Fyfe ojp.gov/pdffiles1/nij/…) & Prof William Terrill @ASUCrimJustice (who co-authored an 8-city examination of citizen complaints w/ Jason R Ingram journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/10…)
25/ In some ways, the answer is "yes, the distribution will always be skewed". Think abt the 80/20 rule AKA the Pareto principle that "roughly 80% of consequences come from 20% of the causes" for example. There will prob always be some officers with a higher number of complaints
26/ But there's no reason to think the skew has to be *this extreme*. As @RJohnkane puts it, it is possible to change the shape of the curve ...

Bar charts showing the distribution of misconduct complaints
27/ *particularly* given the network aspects of misconduct. Because we can't assume cases are independent of each other, focusing on the "super-generators" of complaints could impact the organization at-large, he says.

related point by @Titus_VIII

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Christine Zhang

Christine Zhang Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @christinezhang

20 Feb
NEW from @Claire_Bushey & me:

In cities/metros across the US, the areas most affected by the pandemic are often the slowest to be vaccinated, reflecting long-standing patterns of segregation

We spent weeks gathering the data from 5 of them

Story:
ft.com/content/7b0db8…
Our story begins in Chicago, one of the most segregated cities in the US.

HT @ChiVaxBot and @WF_Parker who have been regularly tracking these disparities & whose work partly inspired us to do our own digging into other localities

Maps of Chicago, Illinois, ...
Variations on this same theme of "Who is vaccinated?" vs" Who is dying?" (this is an actual meme) are playing out in other cities & surrounding areas.

In Washington, DC: Maps of Washington, DC Covi...
Read 19 tweets
16 Nov 20
NEW: #Election2020 turnout is the highest in over a century, but who's gotten the most votes, and where? We looked at precinct & county data in key areas to find out: [THREAD]

By @jburnmurdoch & me — our second @FT collab in two weeks! ⚡️

ft.com/content/31a027…
1/ Much of the story's in the suburbs, which Biden "won back" to a certain extent. Meanwhile, a red rural wave has countered the suburban swing.

Result: an increasingly polarized US.
2/ More detail here: taking battlegrounds MI, PA, WI & GA as a whole, there's a clear & pronounced net vote increase in the suburbs for Biden in 2020 vs Clinton 2016
Read 23 tweets
7 Nov 20
HOW DID AMERICANS VOTE/SHIFT FROM 2016? It's tempting to just compare 2020 exit polls to 16's to unpack voting patterns, but that's problematic.

Our @FT story explains why & uses exits AND other sources to paint a preliminary picture of trends: (THREAD)

ft.com/content/69f320…
0/ TLDR: Here's our summary #dataviz that shows the shifts, because my time in journalism has taught me not to bury the lede 🤓

But hey, it's my twitter thread so I'm gonna answer the "How did you get these numbers?" Qs that @jburnmurdoch & I grappled with *A LOT*
1/ In order to (responsibly) make statements like "___ voters moved away from Biden" and "___ voters shifted toward Trump" since '16 where ___ is a demographic, you need to know:

(a) How this demographic voted in '16
(b) How this demographic voted in '20

Simple, right? No.
Read 25 tweets
4 Sep 20
POLLS EXPLAINER: it's natural to want to compare 2020 election polls to 2016's, especially in swing states, but here's why that might not be such a good idea. My story in the @FT today reviews the key differences: (THREAD)

ft.com/content/b32976…
1/ there's a lot of talk abt Trump/Biden betting odds being at 50:50, but here's a chart via @martinstabe showing in 2016, betting mkts were confident Clinton would win. in surveys more ppl including Trump voters also said they thought Clinton would win ft.com/content/3c9487…
2/ this yr it's the opposite perception; more ppl/mkts think Trump will win. despite Biden's robust national polling lead, compared to Clinton's. now let's address the "the polls were wrong" critique. it's an understandable reaction to 2016, but *national* polls did pretty well!
Read 13 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Too expensive? Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal Become our Patreon

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us on Twitter!

:(