The Republican Party in one picture.

These guys 👇never went away.

For the past 5 decades or so, they were shamed into silence.

Trump and the modern GOP unleashed them.

Who are they? Pro-slavery activists from Missouri who traveled to Kansas in the 1850s.
I've said that as Republican Party hardens into a far-right wing nationalist party, we can expect their numbers to shrink as they get more dangerous.

The shrinking will happen as more people have these moments👇


Listen for the full effect (h/t @joshtpm)
We've all seen this, right?

Mostly our Republican friends and neighbors are enthusiastically embracing the Republican Party as it shows its true colors.

But there is that one or two who always called themselves "conservatives" now backing away, embarrassed by what it is.
The idea that Confederate ideology never went away was a point of @HC_Richardson's book, How the South Won the Civil War.

If you missed my Book Report, here it is:


The perspective is helpful. We've been fighting the same fight for centuries.
I'm stating the obvious here, but the Confederacy was decidedly anti-democratic. So it's really no shock that we one of our two parties is anti-democratic.

There are lots of these guys, and they want a party, too.

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Teri Kanefield

Teri Kanefield Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @Teri_Kanefield

30 May
(Thread) Demagogues, Fascists, and Confederates

I did another Sunday video (☕️+ talk)


I’ll put an edited transcription in the next tweet for those who prefer to read.

I've mostly tweeted this stuff this past week, but I'll do a Twitter summary anyway.
1/ Edited transcript here: terikanefield.com/demagogues-fas…

Stand by for a Twitter summary. But first, more ☕️.
2/ Before I continue, I had an insight reading some Twitter comments.

At least I understand why some people blame the Democratic leadership for the fact that the Republican Party is anti-democratic and actively trying to destroy democracy.

The insight is this . . .
Read 16 tweets
27 May
I'm seeing people say they feel frustrated by the slow workings of politics.

Politics in a democracy is deliberative. The checks and balances intended to create stability also create a slow process. Panic doesn't help.

In an autocracy, things can move swiftly, or even instantly
Profs. Ziblatt and Levitsky say that democracy is "grinding" work.

The problem is that people who say (and actually want) democracy insist that democratic leaders are weak and ineffectual when they are engaging in the work of democracy.
The bigger problem, of course, is that one party right now is anti-democratic.

That makes it all the more important for the other party to embrace democracy and democratic processes, with all of its frustrations.

If both parties abandon democracy, it's all over.
Read 6 tweets
26 May
(Thread) Demagogues and Fascism

@AshaRangappa_’s tweet made me realize that I never did a Twitter Book Report on @jenmercieca’s book.

So here it is.

All screenshots from Mercieca’ Demagogue for President
1/ @jenmercieca takes a deep dive into Trump’s rhetorical strategies.

Looking at these is helpful because we see other Republicans trying to imitate him, but without his skill in deploying these tactics.

The problem didn't end when Trump left the White House.
2/ Also it seems that a bunch of Republicans are trying hard to be another (or the next) Trump by copying these strategies.

@jenmercieca presents Trump as a master con artist. His gaffes weren't gaffes. They were deliberate and masterful uses of aggressive debate tricks.
Read 21 tweets
25 May
No surprise, Trump is trying this👇
nbcnews.com/politics/donal…

He should lose this one. The Constitution specifically says a president can be held accountable in regular court after leaving office.

Absolute immunity = delusion.

Also, remember what McConnell said . . .
First McConnell voted to acquit.

Then he said Trump was "morally and practically" responsible for the insurrection.

Then he said courts were a "more appropriate" venue for holding Trump accountable.
politico.com/news/2021/02/1…

apnews.com/article/donald…
Now Trump is trying to say, "Nope! You can't try me in regular court!"

Well, look. This worked for years.

🎶Gotta keep . . . One jump ahead of the lawmen. . . one swing ahead of the sword🎶

nbcnews.com/politics/donal…
Read 4 tweets
23 May
(Thread) Giuliani’s 1st Amendment Defense

I did another Sunday video (☕️ + talk)


I’ll put an edited transcription in the next tweet for those who prefer📑

I'll also do a Twitter Summary.

(Bonus: This'll help prepare you for the Twitter Bar Exam)
1/ Edited transcript here: terikanefield.com/justice-and-ru…

After a short break (more ☕️) I’ll come back and see if I reduce a 17-minute video down to an 18-tweet thread.
2/ Rep. Swalwell filed a lawsuit against Trump, Jr., Mo Brooks and Giuliani accusing them of inciting the violence of Jan. 6th.

Last week, Giuliani filed a motion to dismiss the suit against him. drive.google.com/file/d/1wRyJHZ…

As expected, he presented a First Amendment defense.
Read 26 tweets
17 May
The rationalization is this: "Makers" deserve a break because they lift everyone by creating jobs.

Workers, on the other hand, are basically lazy (that's why they're not "makers") so financial perks persuade them to stay at home and mooch.

That's the thinking.
(good question)
Adherents of the Ayn Rand view of the world see "makers" and "takers."

Their view: The competent (makers) rise to the top and run the corporations. Takers are not as (1) smart or (2) driven and will take advantage of handouts.

Makers use perks (tax cuts) to help everyone.
Yes, I read Atlas Shrugged.
Read 4 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Too expensive? Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal Become our Patreon

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us on Twitter!

:(