NOW: Senate Republican makes a motion to suspend rules and bring SB 7 conference report to the floor for a vote.
Sen West asks what time the report was filed?
3:36 pm
Rules generally require a 24-hour delay.
#txlege
Sen. @SenBryanHughes says once he gets permission from the GOP majority to suspend 24-hour waiting period, he plans to bring SB 7 to the floor for debate and a vote "no sooner than 10 pm tonight."
#txlege
That would give time for him to brief any senators in the Betty King Room about conference committee changes from the bills that passed the House and Senate.
#txlege
Sen. @beverlypowelltx -- "I would ask that we take the time that's necessary to understand the changes, to understand the entirety of this before we are asked to vote on a bill that affects every single voter in Texas."
#txlege
Sen. @whitmire_john - "Is there any way you will give us more time?" He's unhappy there was no time to talk to election officials and others affected by the sweeping SB 7.
Short answer: No.
#txlege
Sen. @Menendez4Texas objects to holding the debate and vote after 10 pm tonight when few members of the public will be watching.
"Does that seem like the best time for us to be creating some very important policy?"
#txlege
And in a vote that wasn't going to go any other way, Senate votes 18-13, split along party lines, to suspend the 24-hour wait and take up the bill late tonight.
Hughes says he'll brief senators in private at 8 pm about what's in the bill.
Guess I'll see y'all after 10 pm.
#txlege
Bottom line:
Republicans, facing a midnight Sunday deadline to pass #SB7 conference committee report, will work late into the night tonight (and tomorrow morning?) to make it happen.
Senators who want a detailed briefing on major rewrite can get one in private at 8 pm.
#txlege
And remember, no amendments allowed. It's all or nothing on conference reports.
So, knowing the GOP will vote in a bloc to approve #SB7 at some point later, you can read what's going to become law (if the House does the same tomorrow) here: lrl.texas.gov/scanned/87ccrs…
#txlege

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Chuck Lindell

Chuck Lindell Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @chucklindell

31 Dec 20
The remote hearing over AG Paxton's bid for a court order blocking the pandemic-related business curfew in Austin and Travis County is under way before District Judge Amy Clark Meachum.
The holiday weekend orders, banning dine-in food and beverage service from 10:30 p.m. to 6 a.m. tonight thru Sunday morning, so Paxton office requests a ruling before 5 p.m. tonight.
Judge says she'll try to rule by 5 pm, but says it will depend on length and depth of hearing, which is on an injunction instead of faster temp restraining order with at least 1 witness, more arguments.
Read 33 tweets
10 Nov 20
Lt. Gov. Dan Patrick, one of the biggest Trump boosters in Texas, says he'll pay up $1 million to encourage and reward those who report voter fraud. If info leads to arrest/ conviction for voter fraud. expect at least $25,000, he says.
Perhaps wisely, given the trolling and ridicule that has greeted other GOP 1-800 numbers and reporting sites, Patrick says tipsters should turn over their evidence to local law enforcement.
“I support President Trump’s efforts to identify voter fraud in the presidential election," Patrick says.
Read 7 tweets
1 Nov 20
BREAKING: Texas Supreme Court DENIES petition seeking to toss out almost 127,000 Harris County votes cast in drive-thru lanes.
Denial is without comment.
There is still, however, am emergency hearing Monday morning before US District Judge Andrew Hanen on a similar challenge, this time federal, by the same 3 GOP candidates and GOP activist to toss out the votes in the emerging Democratic stronghold of Harris County.
Here's the order that just dropped:
Read 4 tweets
30 Oct 20
Texas Supreme Court asks Harris County to respond, by 4 p.m. today, to a challenge by GOP candidates/activist/House member that seeks to void tens of thousands of Harris County drive-thru votes.
Background:
statesman.com/news/20201028/…
There is no way of knowing how many justices really want this info.
It only takes 1 justice to request a response.
And Justice Devine has previously written a dissent to the dismissal of earlier challenges to Harris County's drive-thru voting sites. Nobody joined the dissent.
Been giving this some thought.
It would take a monumental leap of logic (illogic?) for the Texas Supreme Court to invalidate over 117,000 votes cast in drive-thru polling places in Harris County.

Bear with me:
Read 7 tweets
28 Oct 20
In new petition, GOP candidates and state Rep. Toth ask Texas Supreme Court to REJECT Harris County votes cast in drive-thru lanes (100,000+ so far), calling it illegal curbside voting reserved for sick/disabled.
A new argument after earlier bid to end drive-thru voting failed.
Hotze is a GOP activist in Houston
Champion is a GOP candidate for Congress.
Hemphill is a GOP candidate for District Court.
Toth is GOP member of Texas House from The Woodlands.
This comes after the Texas Supreme Court rejected efforts to shut down drive-thru voting last week by the Republican Party of Texas and a separate petition by Hotze, the Harris County GOP and and Hemphill.
Read 4 tweets
28 Oct 20
US judge in San Antonio REQUIRES all voters, poll workers, and poll watchers in Texas to wear a mask at voting locations. Judge, a Trump appointee, VOIDS portion of Gov. Abbott’s mask mandate that exempted polling places.
More to come.
Judge says exempting those who are “voting, assisting a voter, serving as a poll watcher, or actively administering an election” from compliance with the statewide mask mandate violates the Voting Rights Act "because it creates a discriminatory burden on Black and Latino voters."
Judge initially dismissed the original lawsuit, which sought a long list of poll safety improvements.
5th Circuit Court upheld that ruling but returned case for 1 issue: whether the mask exemption violated the Voting Rights Act.
It does, Judge Jason Pulliam says.
Read 10 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Too expensive? Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal Become our Patreon

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us on Twitter!

:(