Germany's car industry association VDA is at loggerheads with its most important member, the Volkswagen Group
On the surface, it's about membership fees, but in fact it's about everything for the VDA wiwo.de/unternehmen/au…
The dispute is remarkable
VDA versus Volkswagen
Germany's car industry association against Germany's largest car company
The VDA wants to increase the contributions from its members, Volkswagen does not want to go along
VW, however, is not concerned with money but with principle :
VW boss Herbert Diess does not see why he should throw money at an association which, from VW's point of view, is useless and sometimes even damaging to its business
While Volkswagen finally wants to see a car industry that leaves the internal combustion engine behind, marches unitedly towards the electric car and sees tough climate protection regulations as an opportunity and not as a threat . . .
. . . the VDA plays the supreme saviour of the internal combustion engine
The association fights with verve for e-fuels, i.e. synthetic fuels that can theoretically be used to run internal combustion engines in a climate-friendly way . . .
. . . and continues to fuel hopes for hydrogen cars, which are supposed to be a much better solution than battery-electric drives at some point
The association calls this view of the car world "technology openness"
Car expert Ferdinand Dudenhöffer calls it "an attempt to conserve the past"
From VW's point of view, the VDA message is extremely damaging to business, because it tells drivers :
- "better not to buy an e-car, but wait for a better future"
To politicians it says :
- "be careful with the promotion of e-cars, they are not the last word in wisdom either"
And the not entirely small internal combustion faction in the VW Group feels vindicated :
- the electric trend, they hope, could pass them by
It doesn't take much imagination to see how Diess, who has chained the fate of the entire group to the battery-electric drive, feels about his own industry association torpedoing his course in this way
The question arises as to who the VDA with its "openness to technology" is actually fighting for today
VW, Audi, Porsche and Daimler are no longer open on this issue, but have clearly focused on the e-car
So has virtually every other major carmaker in this world
Even BMW, where they still flirt with being open to technology, the battery car now clearly dominates their future strategy
It is only the car suppliers who expect their association to put the brakes on the electric trend and build back doors for combustion engines
Those who make diesel and petrol engines, gearboxes and exhaust systems are threatened by the e-car - not the carmakers, who could care less how their cars are powered
So what does the VDA want to be ?
- the association of the car industry, of the car manufacturers or of the suppliers ?
The lobbyists around President Hildegard Müller are sitting between all chairs
In this situation, of all things, money is running short because the previous main source of income, the IAA motor show, no longer really wants to bubble up
The last trade fair in 2019 already showed signs of disintegration
The next one - planned for September 2021 in Munich - is controversial among the association's members, will have even fewer exhibitors and will probably generate even less revenue
That is why membership fees are now to rise
This is a welcome opportunity for Diess to demonstrate publicly where the hammer is hanging :
The association only has as much money and influence as its members allow it to have
"We have to focus. Technology openness is the wrong slogan now"
Herbert Diess said that in 2018
A lot has happened since then
Court rulings against the German government and against Shell have shown that companies need a solid and fast path to climate neutrality, otherwise they will become victims of the global climate protection drive
This can only be achieved with e-cars and not with nebulous and unpromising e-fuels and hydrogen ideas.
Above all, however, it has now become clear: e-cars, although technically still in the very early stages of their development, are already the better cars
Once a year, the ADAC publishes its list of best cars, i.e. the cars that have performed best in the ADAC car test
In the test, the vehicles are put through their paces
For a fortnight, the test engineers deal with each vehicle, more than 300 points are examined, from technology and safety to handling and costs
- 95 models were examined in 2020, including classics like the Golf (diesel), BMW 3 Series (diesel) and the Mercedes C-Class (petrol)
Do you know who tops the best list ?
- not these classics
- it's the Audi e-tron and the Porsche Taycan
- two electric cars from Germany
- If you want to buy the best car on the market, buy an e-car
- not someday, when the oft-mentioned transformation of the car industry is over
- but today
The die is cast
The carmakers can go electric and they can become so climate-friendly that they finally no longer have to fear climate protection
Germany's car industry does not need technological openness but technological clarity, says Diess
Those who know him know that he will also demand this clarity from his industry association
Given the real balance of power, the result is likely to be a VDA on VW's course
Or a VDA without its most important member, which no one will really take seriously any more
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
The Blue line on this chart gives us a very simple way to think of the economics of the Tesla Model 3 :
Market Price = €20,000 + €100 x Power in kW
- and note that this number INCLUDES Tariffs and Delivery Charges
Clearly this is just an observed empirical outcome
- but we can impute various things from it
1. The launch of production at Giga Grünheide should allow Tesla to reduce prices by more than 10% just from the elimination of Tariffs and reduction of Delivery Charges
2. This could imply a revised formula for an equivalent European-made vehicle, before counting any other savings :