A few thoughts on this Memorial Day about patriotism. From the speech I gave this morning in Glen Ellyn here, but in a condensed thread here for you Twitter-philes. m.facebook.com/castenforcongr…
1/ Memorial Day is a holiday that more than any other, forces us to think about what it means to be patriotic.
2/ First because of it's history. In 1865 African Americans in Charleston SC held the first remembrance of those they lost. A year later, white women in Columbus MS did the same to honor Confederates. The national holiday honoring all war dead didn't come until 1971.
3/ That makes the holiday a perfect metaphor for America's relationship with race. The work of southern blacks, coopted by southern whites and then nationally sanitized.
4/ But at a bigger level, it forces us to ask what it means to be patriotic in a democracy. What is the balance between insisting that our government does the people's bidding, and the the people sacrificing for the greater national good?
5/ The 1865 celebration, and the one we celebrate today is about that exceptional and rare selfless patriotism. Honoring those who sacrificed all of their individual self interests for the collective good.
6/ But the 1866 celebration - and the events of last January 6th - are different. Selfish narcissism, dressed in a patriotic costume. Taking up arms against your government lest the will of a democratic majority prevail.
7/ To be sure, we want a representative government that listens to it's citizens. But as Teddy Roosevelt said "the fundamental rule in our national life is that on the whole, and in the long run, we go up or down together."
8/ In other words, we are e pluribus, but only in the path of creating our unum. We take our greatest pride as a nation in those exceptional moments in our history - like D-Day - when we put that collective good over our individual self-interest.
9/ And we hold in highest esteem those exceptional individuals - from John McCain to John Lewis, to all the fallen soldiers we honor today - who put our national unity over their individual self-interest.
10/ True, selfless patriotism is worthy of our praise precisely because it is so hard. And the events of January 6 make a stronger case than I can here on the importance of being ever-vigilant against it's easy narcissistic opposite.
11/ The men and women we honor today didn't always agree with their government. But they gave everything to preserve it.
12/ And so long as it remains partisan to criticize those who incited, encouraged and participated in the 1/6 attack, the democracy our heroes gave their lives to defend is at risk.
13/ So take some time today to reflect on, and take inspiration from those who had the content of character to sacrifice everything not for themselves, but for these UNITED States.
14/ "It is for us, the living to be dedicated to the unfinished work for which they who fought so nobly advanced." /fin
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
I'm proud to represent #IL06, the district once represented by Henry Hyde. And I'm delighted to see @POTUS proposing a budget that finally gets rid of my predecessor's anti-choice legacy. politico.com/news/2021/05/2…
1/ The data is unambiguous: reducing access to abortions doesn't reduce the incidence of abortions. It just reduces their safety. Take away the access to safe procedures and women die.
2/ The Hyde Amendment, therefore has the practical effect only of compromising the health of lower income women who depend on government-provided healthcare. It is evil and inhumane.
Enough clean gen in the queue to get half way to a zero-carbon grid (e.g., developers want to build them) but held back by delays in grid-interconnection rules.
If we want clean energy... if we want cheap energy, we have to fix the barriers imposed by a system and governance process that is overwhelmingly biased to preserve the status quo.
This morning, I woke up to a story about an antisemitic act in IL06. We had received no calls from constituents, nor were we able to confirm it occurred. I am not going to re-tweet it, but it is cause for a brief discussion of Israel, Palestine and social media disinformation
1/ First, there is no conflict between being pro-Israel and being committed to human rights for everyone living in Gaza and the West Bank.
2/ If that is your view as well, the cycle of attacks and counter attacks every 3 - 7 years is the irreducible problem. Our goal must be to ensure that we aren't having this same conversation 5 years from now.
A brief thread on what happened on the floor today. Because you all need to understand the Q-Knucklehead caucus and the utter failure of leadership that is @GOPLeader:
1/ I'm not naming them because they don't deserve the attention. But you know who they are.
2/ The House physician has advised that members who are vaccinated no longer need wear masks. But because so many members of the House (exclusively, in the Q-Knucklehead caucus) are not vaccinated, we are still asked to wear masks on the floor. wral.com/list-house-mem…
This is a jaw-dropping report from the IEA; partly because of their conclusion, but also because of who they are. Time for an overdue #energytwitter nerd thread on transitions: nytimes.com/2021/05/18/cli…
1/ First, if you read this and think "making the kind of transitions that IEA recommends would be massively disruptive", you're right.
2/ Rapidly phasing out gasoline vehicles has huge impacts on manufacturing & maintenance chains. Blocking new oil & gas leases impacts everyone mid-career and earlier in that sector. Debt and equity holders would see massive write-offs of capital that hasn't yet been amortized
This is a sad, but necessary read. So often when I talk with climate scientists they tell me that they are reluctant to disclose all that they have learned because they don't want people to lose hope. nytimes.com/2021/05/14/opi…
To be clear, don't lose hope! This is a massive challenge that will require all of us working together. Promising nothing more than blood, toil, tears and sweat should never be cause for giving up.
But do know that in a world informed only by facts, the debate would be about how to maintain optimism in the face of terrible odds. How to be inspired to exceed ourselves. And we would succeed.