I know that real science doesn't matter anymore, but anyways....
This Nature paper shows that mild C19 infections enables robust, long term programming of bone marrow memory cells to produce C19 antibodies when needed. Imagine that, everything is normal and as expected. 1/
So lets recap, we have hundreds of papers clearly demonstrating a strong, diverse and long lasting immune response to C19. 90 percent of Canadians even had pre existing co- immunity. Both together ensured that C19 infection was never a major threat to Canadians. 2/
This was of course plainly obvious from the demographic findings collected over the last 15 months. No doubt public health will ignore this mountain of data as it fumbles along with its poorly conceived vaccination process. 3/
This paper, like the hundreds of others, reveals how divorced Canada's public health community is from reality. Lets hope the C19 debacle is the wake up call needed to dismantle and restructure this dysfunctional goverment agency. End.

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Donald Welsh

Donald Welsh Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @DonaldWelsh16

31 May
Your weekly reminder that you are in the midst of the largest social policy failure in Canadian history. This week, it's a reading assignment, a remarkable piece of work from Julius Ruechel. 1/
juliusruechel.com/2021/05/the-li…
Grab two coffees and about 60 mins of time to work through this treatise. Quantitative and analytical, with 40 figures/exhibits, the reading is indepth, intense and damming. It lays out in detail not just the misdirection but the negligence behind the C19 response. 2/
The argument is simple and credible. The actions of senior bureaucrats and MOHs have exposed gov't to charges of gross negligence leading to harm and death. The treatise follows in a series of steps. 3/
Read 6 tweets
25 May
A weekly reminder that you're in the midst of the worst social policy failure in Canadian history. Yes, it's alarming to watch especially in the absence of corrective action. Dreadful leadership plays a role but there is a larger structurally dynamic as well. 1/
That dynamic centers on the perpetual debate as how best to solve large societal problems. That argument pivots between two poles, that being a centralized or decentralized solution. Canada's constitutional design is purposely leveraged towards decentralized solutions. 2/
Despite this structural preference, Canada's C19 response has been centrally driven. The federal and provincial gov'ts (Ontario) consolidated power within cabinent and decision making bodies including PHAC, Ontario public health and the Ontario Science Table. 3/
Read 10 tweets
22 May
A rigorous investigation of Canada's C19 response and the murky operations of PHAC has become evident to those both inside and outside gov't. By any stretch of the imagination, the C19 response was a self inflicted wound and monumental policy failure. 1/
A royal commission fully funded to do deep investigative work is critical. It must be led by someone with a stellar track record of jurisprudence, integrity and independence. I suggest Beverly McLachlin, Canada's former chief justice. 2/
No stone should be left unturned as this debacle should never be repeated. This commission will need to define and provide policy solutions for PHAC's long stream of administrative/scientific failures. Two elements stand out. 3/
Read 6 tweets
17 May
I remember a MP named Sven Robinson. Young, passionate and openly gay when that was a liability. At a party, he walked away with a piece of jewelry, a flight of fancy. A week later, he rose in parliament, admitted his error and resigned. It was simple, he had broken trust. 1/
It was an act that left an indelible mark on a younger version of me. It framed my view of what it meant to be a public figure. It instilled faith in the political process and reminded me how seriously public officials took their actions and responsibilities. 2/
Here, some 30 years later, many Canadians sit with their trust in gov't shattered by a public health community that has been disturbing incorrect and inflexible. It has walled itself off and retreated into ideology and archane theory. 3/
Read 6 tweets
16 May
Superb journalism by Trish Woods interviewing Nicholas Wade (former NYT journalist). In careful detail, Mr. Wade discusses the origins of C19, leading you to a logical conclusion. It must have come from the Wuhan Lab, a gain of function experiment. 1/

podcasts.apple.com/ca/podcast/cov…
Its two hours in length and the approach is methodical, as the two careful weigh the evidence left at the so called "crime scene". There is nuance and it's thought provoke. It's a welcome change from the thoughtless propaganda of commercial TV. 2/
From day 1, Canada's C19 response has appeared rather misguided and aimless. There was always a piece of the puzzle missing, that being an accurate accounting for the origins of C19. The natural emergence hypothesis lacked evidence and credibility. 3/
Read 6 tweets
14 May
15 months into the C19 response and Canadians are confronted with an unflattering reality. Contrary to our national myth of "sound governance" we find ourselves devoid of leadership and being slowly suffocated by empty platitudes and virtue signaling. 1/
From the local to the federal level, leaders are adrift, too scared to face the truth. That being our public health response to C19 has been an abject failure from start-to-finish. Our leaders lacked either the fortitude or skill to stop it. 2/
Canada's C19 response should have been stopped on day 1. Claims of viral lethality and efficiacy of NPIs/vaccines were wildly exaggerated. Instead of walking back these claims, public health embraced them, creating interlocking layers of incoherent policy. 3/
Read 6 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Too expensive? Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal Become our Patreon

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us on Twitter!

:(