China's demographic crisis is fascinating, and alarming, because it shows that even a brutal totalitarian hyper-nationalist government cannot reverse the demographic crash afflicting most industrialized populations. The core reason for the crash is becoming apparent...
... it's because having babies is HARD, especially on women.
That's the big secret lost during the latter half of the 20th Century that is slowly, painfully being rediscovered by the 21st, in both free and unfree societies. Everyone underestimated how hard child-rearing is.
That sounds simple and obvious, but let me assure you, it is anything BUT obvious to political elites, everywhere from Western democracies to Communist China. They all convinced themselves family formation and child-rearing are purely materialistic processes, almost industrial.
When birthrates begin to dip, the elites assume they can "fix" the problem with a few more government handouts: a bit more financial support for maternity, more generous family leave policies, lavishly funded child care programs, etc.
But the truth is that having children is such a difficult endeavor, especially for the women who give birth and are so deeply involved in nurturing the babies, that mere financial incentives are not enough. Couples don't delay marriage and family because of minor money problems.
China just explicitly confirmed the big secret of demographics: healthy societies require a large number of families to have THREE children or more. China allowing two kids had nearly zero effect on decline. Likewise Western couples having one "designer baby" late in life.
It's simple and obvious, a truth known instinctively by the deplorable masses: population slides unless the average couple produces 2.1 or 2.2 children or whatever. You have to reproduce above mere replacement level. This was well-understood for all of human history until now.
How do you convince a large number of couples to have more than two kids? How do you encourage a large number of women to go through childbirth three times or more, a large number of fathers to embrace the burden of providing for so many children?
That's the question at the heart of demographic decline in every society dominated by leftist, collectivist thought, from Western liberalism to Chinese communism. Materialist left-wing elites convinced themselves to forget what a thousand generations of mankind had learned...
... only love and faith will do it. Only deep love between men and women, pervasive cultural support for their special bond, insatiable love for children, and deep faith - transcendence, love and hope for the future - can overwhelm the many reasons NOT to have three kids.
Sensible reasons not to have children, especially more than two, multiply in prosperous advanced societies. The reasons upscale urban Chinese women give for not getting started young on raising large families sound remarkably similar to the answers from American or British women.
We don't want to sacrifice our comfortable lifestyle for incredibly expensive children. We don't want to ruin our careers. Kids are something we can do later, when school and career are well in hand. There's too much going on in our busy modern lives, we wouldn't be good parents.
And in the West, do not underestimate the pressure against marriage and family created by doomsday environmentalism and the Left's "humanity is a virus" moralizing. The minds of educated young couples are marinated in that garbage, in school and pop culture, their whole lives.
If you ask an upscale, college-educated young American woman if she plans to have three kids, her answer is very likely to include a comment about how bringing so many children into an overcrowded dying planet wracked by income inequality seems sinful to her.
The big problem is that even as modern prosperity increases the disincentives for marrying young and raising large families - the irreplaceable key to healthy, growing societies - modern political ideology deliberately targets and destroys the faith that might counter them.
Every single cultural force that might prevail against the numerous sensible reasons to delay marriage and family into middle age, every single social and religious imperative for making those incredible sacrifices to have three kids, has been hunted down and destroyed.
At the moment, our death-cult left-wing culture is working very hard on obliterating the idea that women have any special role or responsibility in child-rearing at all. Men can have babies too, don't you know! Saying otherwise is a thoughtcrime that will be harshly punished!
In China, the problem was ideological arrogance. They thought faith and love could be replaced by stern orders from Communist central planners to start pumping out babies when the State decided overpopulation was no longer a problem. Ambitious young professionals are not obeying.
Our dominant left-wing political ideology ALSO created the massive problem that demographic decline is pushing us into: lack of enough young workers to provide the revenue necessary to finance social programs designed with the assumption of perpetual growth.
The Left built the bomb AND lit the fuse. Moving away from religious faith and cultural support for marrying young and raising large families, at the same time they were building a gigantic Ponzi-scheme welfare state, made a demographic crisis inevitable - and perhaps insoluble.
The damage of generations cannot be easily repaired, and it might be almost impossible to repair it at all, since at this point even DISCUSSING the problem honestly is thoughtcrime. So many moms and dads out there know the truth, but they're discouraged from sharing their wisdom.
And our "science"-obsessed, media-driven political culture knows the truth, too. They have oceans of studies proving everything I've said in this thread, mountains of data about the danger of demographic decline, and the importance of kids being raised by their own moms AND dads.
But they are ideologically prevented from honestly addressing the simple question at the heart of all this: how do you convince ambitious young women to have three or more children? /end
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
As we confront the rising evil and growing power of the Chinese Communist Party, June 4 is day to remember that some of the bravest people to stand up for freedom - at Tiananmen Square in 1989, and today - are also Chinese.
Tiananmen Square is where the illusions of the postwar international order died, along with countless brave Chinese democracy activists. On that day, the forces of evil learned they could murder their way to power, even in the dawning Information Age.
The CCP's internal communications from that day are illuminating. Some of them thought their regime was doomed, that nothing could be done against the blossoming of democracy in Tiananmen Square - not with the whole world watching, not with cameras and fax machines everywhere.
Fauci is the living embodiment of our big government Ineptocracy: a mediocre bureaucrat obsessed with his privileges and drunk on his taste of stardom, pawned off on the American people as a brilliant expert in a complex scientific field.
Fauci is far from the only bureaucrat misrepresented as a dispassionate scientific expert. It's the biggest running scam in Big Government. We're CONSTANTLY instructed to view selfish mediocrities who put politics first as selfless geniuses who know what's best for everyone.
Corruption is so endemic in this system that Big Government apparatchiks literally cannot see it. Many of them know they're corrupt and take steps to cover their graft, but some genuinely think of corrupt arrangements with special interests as just The Way Things Work.
The true, bloody, and brutal story of Antifa, Abolish the Police, and Black Lives Matter is following exactly the same trajectory as the Wuhan lab leak story. The truth was dismissed as a conspiracy theory and ruthlessly suppressed until it could no longer be ignored.
With both the coronavirus origin and urban unrest stories, the media ran like a witless herd, easily manipulated by small groups of bad sources with big megaphones, easily stampeded away from listening to the "icky" people who happened to be telling the truth.
This is one reason it's important not to let the media get away with a half-hearted shrug of "golly, maybe we should have taken that lab leak theory seriously after all" and a bout of furious stealth-editing for their old callous dismissals. They keep DOING THIS. It's systemic.
Why does Marxist thought inspire so much violence? It goes back to that core oppression narrative, the notion that private ownership of capital is exploitation and free societies are SYSTEMICALLY corrupt (or "racist" in the currently fashionable iteration of Marxist theory.)
Of course every collectivist, statist philosophy is inherently violent, because sooner or later they must use force to compel obedience, but Marxism gets to looting, burning, beating, and killing VERY quickly because it sells itself as a revolution against systemic corruption.
We don't reflect enough on how every exercise of state power is an implicit threat to use force. As I believe Walter Williams once put it, even the most benign-sounding law ends with an implied "... or you'll be killed," because that is the final outcome of disobedience.
I got in one really big fight in grade school. I was a Catholic kid living in a pleasant, mostly Jewish neighborhood. One day I saw some Jewish classmates picking on a very small Orthodox boy for wearing his yarmulke. My friends and I stepped in to defend him. Punches flew.
The aftermath, when everyone was cooling their heels in detention, involved us comically confused Christian kids asking the Orthodox boy what the yarmulke was, why he wore it to school, and why the heck would other Jewish kids give him a hard time about it.
We didn't know what was going on that day. We just saw a little guy getting shoved around by a bunch of big guys. We learned a lot that day, and made a new friend who was part of our little outcast crew ever afterward. (Everything feels like forever when you're that age.)
It's like Tom Tuttle from Tacoma in "Volunteers." We sent over a tough-guy wrestler action star, and in two seconds flat we get back a sniveling toady regurgitating Communist propaganda.
Anybody still think globalist economic and cultural engagement will liberalize China?
You know what will put a stop to this disgusting cowardice from Hollywood? Make it cost more for them to suck up to China than it would cost to speak up for freedom and justice. Kill this Fast and Furious movie dead at the box office and scare the ever-loving hell out of studios.
Nothing ELSE will do it, that's for sure, China has proven that its "sharp power" policies - weaponizing its entire economy to serve the geopolitical interests of the Communist Party, using its financial leverage to compel obedience from "free" world corporations - WORKS.