Thread by @McAdooGordon

Charles may be right that DJT has said or believes this, but neither he nor Maggie Haberman name ANY source for the claim. The Right is correct & rational to be skeptical of a story based only on anonymous sources, especially one about DJT. /1

nationalreview.com/2021/06/maggie…

And Maggie’s tweet 👇🏻 hardly qualifies as “reporting.” She points to no source or evidence for her factual assertion & then offers her own legal opinion at the end. Given her track record with the Russian collusion hoax, people are wise to be wary of anything she says. /2

I agree w/Charles on the substance of the matter. You can see my thoughts in my tweets on Sunday commenting on Sidney Powell’s remark about “reinstatement.” There would be a myriad of constitutional & legal problems even if it were crystal clear to all that DJT had really won. /3

WaPo reported on this also today w/an article that’s also ONLY sourced anonymously & contains these paragraphs seeming to concede it could be something others around him are saying but DJT might not be taking seriously. This is why named sources & attributed quotes are important.

So basically, regardless of whether it’s true or not, at this point the MSM “reporting” on this is 👇🏻