- READ THE REDACTIONS -
Sometimes it's in the empty spaces where most meaning sits. Most people have been slicing away at the whole and complete emails from Dr. Fauci's email FOIA release. And, admittedly, some of those intact emails are highly satisfying to read.
Sometimes it's in the empty spaces where most meaning sits. Most people have been slicing away at the whole and complete emails from Dr. Fauci's email FOIA release. And, admittedly, some of those intact emails are highly satisfying to read.
But what is far more interesting are the pages of greyed out redactions. Consider pages 1567-1572 from his emails. 
They are of his correspondence with Dr. Kenneth Bergmann, Senior Medical Officer in the Division of Neurology in the Center for Drug Evaluation and Research at the FDA that took place between April 4th - April 15th, 2020.
At first glance, they are frustratingly empty, and completely redacted except for the exceptionally intriguing subject line of "a thought on selective vulnerability to SARS-CoV-2" - something we all want to know about! Why would it be redacted?
How in the world does such an important discussion get redacted? What was his theory that Dr. Fauci thought enough of that he said he had considered it and to then forward on to his assistant to follow up on?!
Infuriating!!
BUT
Infuriating!!
BUT
Sometimes, we get lucky. Someone doesn't do their job quite perfectly, and some breadcrumbs slip through the cracks - in the attached image above, where the redactor missed the names of the attached documents in the forwarded email that Dr. Bergmann was referring to.
Whoops!
So we have some names of documents - already the names are highly intriguing. But the documents themselves make even more staggering reading.
Specifically the following two:
nejm.org/doi/pdf/10.105…... and ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/P…
So we have some names of documents - already the names are highly intriguing. But the documents themselves make even more staggering reading.
Specifically the following two:
nejm.org/doi/pdf/10.105…... and ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/P…
I believe Dr. Bergmann's argument was that young children fight off SARS-CoV-2 with extreme efficiency because of the dominance of natural killer cells (NK) of their innate immune systems.
While the activation of the adaptive immune system in adults can lead to an inappropriate and extremely dangerous inflammatory cytokine storm when faced with a similar threat.
In other words, the NK cells of the innate immune system are highly effective, while man-made (monoclonal) antibodies can create a highly destructive inflammatory response.
Paging Dr. Vand3n Bøssche - I believe you are owed an apology.
Paging Dr. Vand3n Bøssche - I believe you are owed an apology.
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
