I think it's good that Schumer is going to take the filibuster fight more public, but I think he should consider also focussing on issues that would put more specific pressure on Manchin (e.g. issues white rural people like), such as prescription drug pricing + Medicare 
Manchin being a roadblock in prescription drug costs and/or even slightly lowering the Medicare age would get press in West Virginia. It would also likely get press in Arizona. Make at least part of the fight about what will create heat in Manchin & Sinema's home states.
Prescription drug costs are one of the #1 issues among voters. The House passed a bill on Medicare negotiations, but the gloriously bipartisan Senate sat on it under McConnell. Schumer should elevate this & similar battles.
I don't have confidence GOPers will get in line for a nice bill on prescription drug costs, but Dems should be sure to make it just progressive enough to repel them. Make the fight high-profile. Force a vote. Say, "Well, if it weren't for that damn filibuster, you'd be saving $$"
Lowering the Medicare age to 60 or 55 would also be a good strategy. Of course *I* want to go farther, but that small step would play well w/ WV + AZ voters. It would be hard for the GOP to pull off "socialism," given it's already a popular program & you're just changing the age
And I should say, for the record, I am not arguing that Dems throw fights for social justice under the bus. I absolutely do not believe that. I am saying that, in terms of the filibuster strategy, they need to choose issues that will bring local pressure on Manchin & Sinema.
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
