Great NYT article by @powellnyt on how @ACLU has become so unrecognizable -- from a stalwart civil liberties group to a standard #Resistance liberal/Dem political organization -- that its old-school iconic leftist lawyers are stunned by what it's become:
Powell captures the nuances of the ACLU's decline. It still has some great lawyers with the old-school vision of the group as about non-partisan civil liberties, free speech & due process. But the anti-Trump money has become so massive that it now mostly serves its liberal base.
A couple of rather revealing "whoopsies" from the ACLU:
I spoke with Joe Rogan about why the loss of this old-school ACLU civil liberties cause is so tragic: it was an outgrowth of the best of 20th century leftism & Jewish leftist thought specifically. But it's being destroyed by broader social pathologies:
As I said, there are still some great lawyers at @ACLU, both national and state. They crusade for @Snowden, denounce the Assange prosecution, represent the NRA & KKK and other right-wing groups in free speech cases, sued Obama repeatedly, etc.
But they're now vastly outgunned.
In 2019, I was working on a big article on internal rifts at @ACLU - interviewed dozens there, etc - but never finished because that's when I was contacted by my Brazil source & that consumed the next year of my life.
The problem is that free speech has become increasingly disfavored as a key value for US liberalism generally and millennials in particular. So it's clear that - with exceptions - ACLU now more resembles a standard liberal advocacy group doing political work adored by liberals.
I hope the fair and nuanced article by @powellnyt leads to new interest in "Mighty Glasser," the great documentary about the ACLU's 1978-2001 Exec. Dir Ira Glasser. He is its best exponent of the leftist defense of free speech.
I interviewed him here:
The documentary's name is "Mighty Ira" (not "Mighty Glasser"). Can watch it here. Really worth it.
For its great report on how the richest Americans pay no taxes, @propublica admits they have no idea who their anonymous source is who provided these tax docs - could be foreign actors, a criminal, anyone. But they're publishing anyway: and they should.
It's always been a core principle of journalism that a journalist only cares about 2 questions: are the docs 1) authentic & 2) in the public interest? If so, you report them *regardless* of who the source is or their motives.
But like so many things, the US media abandoned that in the name of stopping Trump. They essentially refused to report on authentic docs that came from foreign sources if that would undermine Biden. They even cheered a blogger who voluntarily turned in her own source to FBI.
A majority of *Republicans* in the US now support same-sex marriage. 70% of the US population overall does. 84% of all people 18-34 support it. The US Supreme Court made same-sex marriage legal in all 50 states but, politically, this debate is now over.
Amazing how rapidly and radically this debate changed. This was only 2004:
And it was just 2008 when Obama, on the campaign trail, held an event with the evangelical pastor Rick Warren and told him he opposes same-sex marriage because, when it comes to marriage, "God is in the mix."
It's like what happened with Mueller: once liberals start revering a government official (which they often do), any criticisms of that state idol are inherently illegitimate and ill-intentioned.
(Of course, once they disappoint liberals -- as Mueller did -- it's open season).
There's a virtual industry of operatives funded by the Atlantic Council -- which in turn is funded by Gulf State despots and US intel agencies & NATO governments -- whose purpose is to demand the internet be purged of anyone dissenting from their orthodoxies.
Pro-censorship operatives from the Atlantic Council have built fan bases among US liberals because that movement is devoted to censoring anyone and everyone whose questions their pieties and narratives.
For all of you liberal groupies of Atlantic Council censorship operatives like @jaredlholt, here's what your cheering for: their own description of who funds them.