We think it’s probably because NHS Digital actually *agrees* with us that patients need more time to learn about the data grab and to choose whether or not to opt-out, as the BBC reported here: bbc.co.uk/news/technolog…
That means it's only Matt Hancock who refuses to do the right thing: stop the plan, drop the opt-out deadline and launch a proper national debate. Sign our petition to tell him to see sense before we’re forced to take him to court: foxglove.org.uk/nhs-data
"We will use this time to talk to patients, doctors, health charities, doctors, and others to strengthen the plan, build a trusted research environment, and ensure that data is accessed securely." - Jo Churchill
This is an important step.
We still have questions: how will patients be notified, including people who aren't online? How will the trusted research environment work? On what terms will corporations be allowed to access people's health data?
There IS no public health without public trust – so we were also v concerned when the gov’t wouldn’t rule out dodgy US tech companies like Palantir being given contracts to manage this giant new pool of confidential patient data:
Time is running out. The deadline to opt out is 23 June. Most people haven’t heard of the scheme. The gov’t hasn’t properly informed or involved patients.
If they don’t fix it, we’ve got to go for an injunction ASAP. We sent an urgent legal letter: ft.com/content/a13225…
Our coalition says the process for scraping 55m people’s confidential health records and putting in a central database has been rushed and unfair – and is unlawful.
Unless the scheme is stopped and changed, we will take the government to court.
We’re asking everyone to join us in doing the same: nopalantir.org.uk
[THREAD]
Palantir, whom you might remember from 🍉 cocktail fame, is using COVID-19 to get their hooks into our NHS. They were brought in without public consultation or open procurement, and we had to threaten a lawsuit to get information about their data deal:
Time and again Palantir’s tech has been used to harm, not heal. Founded by Trump-backing Peter Thiel, they’ve enabled some of the worst actions of the US surveillance state - from border forces to police.
⏰BREAKING: HMG quietly rolled out a scheme to seize - & sell access to - the health data of every man, woman, and child in England. Patients weren’t asked.
Legal issues? We think so. So we helped @JustTreatment send a legal letter. @madhumita29 in @FT: ft.com/content/9fee81…
In many ways, this fight is about the future of the NHS.
The NHS sits atop the most valuable trove of health data in the world. Why? For years, your GP record has been stored not in doctor's scrawled notes but using GP codes, which a computer can 'read'. (h/t @marcus_baw)
This makes NHS health data of *massive* interest to researchers. So far, so good - we all want the NHS to come out of the pandemic stronger.
But there are issues: who gets access? On what terms? Who can patients trust? And who benefits – us, the NHS, or private companies?
Special mention to our friends at @TBIJ who obtained key emails at the start of this case, showing Palantir wooing NHS execs and UK officials over Davos chats and watermelon cocktails.