"We will use this time to talk to patients, doctors, health charities, doctors, and others to strengthen the plan, build a trusted research environment, and ensure that data is accessed securely." - Jo Churchill
This is an important step.
We still have questions: how will patients be notified, including people who aren't online? How will the trusted research environment work? On what terms will corporations be allowed to access people's health data?
We will be following up urgently about our questions with government through their lawyers and will keep everyone updated.
And if the scope of the concessions don't actually protect people's data, when you read the fine print, rest assured - we will take this issue to court to fight for our NHS and for patient trust.
We hope the gov't will use this time to rebuild trust.
They may be hoping delay means people lose interest - we need to keep up pressure, and stay laser-focused on protecting privacy and preventing privatisation of this major asset without people's say so. Our data, our choice.
Make no mistake - it was people power that forced them to this position. We couldn't have done it without you. To follow this story as it develops, please sign up for updates: foxglove.org.uk/get-involved
Oh, and one more thing: this is what the threat of judicial review can achieve. It protects *everyone*.
The government wants to limit your access to the courts. We can't let that happen.
The threat of JR is only possible with our amazing legal teams. So MAJOR shout-out to Robert Palmer QC and Julianne Morrison of @moncktonlaw, who represent the coalition in this case.
And given all these questions remain -
if you aren't yet satisfied about what's happening to your health data, to protect your position until you ARE, go here:
Oops - should've mentioned our amazing partners the @NPCUK! (Sorry, team). They stood up for thousands of older people who aren't online and who'd had no chance to hear about this.
Government can leaflet the nation. It can text everyone with a phone. Will they? Stay tuned. 👀
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
We think it’s probably because NHS Digital actually *agrees* with us that patients need more time to learn about the data grab and to choose whether or not to opt-out, as the BBC reported here: bbc.co.uk/news/technolog…
That means it's only Matt Hancock who refuses to do the right thing: stop the plan, drop the opt-out deadline and launch a proper national debate. Sign our petition to tell him to see sense before we’re forced to take him to court: foxglove.org.uk/nhs-data
There IS no public health without public trust – so we were also v concerned when the gov’t wouldn’t rule out dodgy US tech companies like Palantir being given contracts to manage this giant new pool of confidential patient data:
Time is running out. The deadline to opt out is 23 June. Most people haven’t heard of the scheme. The gov’t hasn’t properly informed or involved patients.
If they don’t fix it, we’ve got to go for an injunction ASAP. We sent an urgent legal letter: ft.com/content/a13225…
Our coalition says the process for scraping 55m people’s confidential health records and putting in a central database has been rushed and unfair – and is unlawful.
Unless the scheme is stopped and changed, we will take the government to court.
We’re asking everyone to join us in doing the same: nopalantir.org.uk
[THREAD]
Palantir, whom you might remember from 🍉 cocktail fame, is using COVID-19 to get their hooks into our NHS. They were brought in without public consultation or open procurement, and we had to threaten a lawsuit to get information about their data deal:
Time and again Palantir’s tech has been used to harm, not heal. Founded by Trump-backing Peter Thiel, they’ve enabled some of the worst actions of the US surveillance state - from border forces to police.
⏰BREAKING: HMG quietly rolled out a scheme to seize - & sell access to - the health data of every man, woman, and child in England. Patients weren’t asked.
Legal issues? We think so. So we helped @JustTreatment send a legal letter. @madhumita29 in @FT: ft.com/content/9fee81…
In many ways, this fight is about the future of the NHS.
The NHS sits atop the most valuable trove of health data in the world. Why? For years, your GP record has been stored not in doctor's scrawled notes but using GP codes, which a computer can 'read'. (h/t @marcus_baw)
This makes NHS health data of *massive* interest to researchers. So far, so good - we all want the NHS to come out of the pandemic stronger.
But there are issues: who gets access? On what terms? Who can patients trust? And who benefits – us, the NHS, or private companies?
Special mention to our friends at @TBIJ who obtained key emails at the start of this case, showing Palantir wooing NHS execs and UK officials over Davos chats and watermelon cocktails.