N custodial wallets are hubs and the M citizens are spokes.
If a user of wallet 1 sends a transaction to a user of wallet 2, then the transfer looks instant on their screens.
Bulk settlement happens later on-chain between wallet 1 and 2.
Let’s say there are N=10 popular custodial wallets & they all do bulk settlement with each other every 24 hours. That’s N*(N-1)/2 = 45 pairwise on-chain Bitcoin L1 transactions per day, which is feasible.
Also, add in N daily on-chain transactions with the state’s Bitcoin fund.
Now, this sounds pretty centralized!
But it’s a step forward over the previous system because the BTC backend is more transparent, programmable, and international than what preceded it.
For example, anyone can set up a wallet, view on-chain transactions, and confirm reserves.
So from a payments perspective at least the wheel may be reinvented — in the short run.
But let’s not forget the stable monetary policy of the Bitcoin backend, which is key.
More logistical details to consider.
1) Education: need excellent Spanish language materials.
2) Exchange: the state’s central “trust fund” needs to market make BTC liquidity so that anyone can sell (or buy) at any time. Like the new gold window, this handles redemptions.
3) Custody: if these are mostly custodial wallets, this may not be as pressing, but will need infra here.
4) Portfolio: everyone in El Salvador will need to figure out how much of their net worth to hold in BTC, based on their risk tolerance, balance sheet, price forecast, etc.
5) Security: need attention here for each custodial wallet & especially the state’s central Bitcoin trust fund. Cold storage, Faraday cage, can’t be too paranoid.
6) Fees: I’ve seen $400/month in income for El Salvadorans. With BTC fees at $4-40, on-chain txs are very expensive.
My general feeling is that every theoretical debate we’ve had in crypto over the last 10 years will get put to the test immediately over the next months and years in El Salvador.
As the rising third power in the world, India has the potential to be the center of a new Aligned Movement — an upgrade to the Non-Aligned Movement that aligns every neutral country behind Bitcoin and decentralized crypto protocols. balajis.com/add-crypto-to-…
Crucially, Crypto Capital isn't anti-American or anti-Chinese for that matter.
There are Woke Americans & Crypto Americans, Crypto Chinese & Communist Chinese.
The Crypto American is much closer to the average Chinese hodler than to Warren, Trump, or Xi Jinping.
If I’m reading this right, all economic agents that are technologically capable of receiving BTC as payment *must* accept it as payment — though instant conversion to USD is made available to anyone who doesn’t want to take price risk.
The state of El Salvador has just mandated that all merchants in a country of 6.4M people accept BTC (with instant conversion for those who don’t want price risk).
This is a legal flippening. From “banning” Bitcoin to mandating it.
The new listing decision is making a cryptocurrency your government’s legal tender.
Cryptonetworks are attaining the scale (millions of holders) & resources (billions of dollars) to start conducting foreign policy.
Like digital proto-states, negotiating with nation states.
There are advantages for both decentralized and semi-centralized networks in this process.
A decentralized network can just be adopted. Any country can just stockpile BTC.
But a semi-centralized network, or a DAO, can offer billions in listing fees to incent national adoption.
Companies like Tesla, Amazon, and Google have negotiated with governments for some time. There are carrots & sticks on both sides. And often there is a binding promise of investment, made by a (centralized) CEO.
Cryptonetworks can now do similar things with on-chain commitments.
If this is true, then a small country like Tuvalu (which gets a big chunk of revenue from the .tv domain name) could declare #BTC (and ETH!) to be legal tender.
The benefits would easily be worth billions.
So: could we legally crowdfund a prize for the first country to do this?
“Under the current deal…Verisign pays Tuvalu around $5 million per year for the right to administer .tv. For a nation whose annual domestic revenues tend to hover around $60 million, this is a substantial benefit.” washingtonpost.com/video-games/20…