Okay before I share any of this, for the record, I'm not actually critiquing HyFlex. HyFlex, bless its heart, is fine. What I'm critiquing is #HigherEd's continued reliance on garbage can decision making.
While there are some exceptions, I've yet to see any compelling data or argument that HyFlex is better than a well-designed, fully online course taught by an awesome online educator. And the costs in terms of faculty stress and the tech being poured into it continue to amass...
I'm going to try to use this thread to aggregate data on HyFlex. If you know of any, please chime in.
Of course, we already have oodles of data on what works for student retention and completion (wraparound support, supporting faculty in their pedagogy), but I digress...
First off, in my initial dive into the lit, there are a lot of articles talking about "practical considerations" for HyFlex that assume its worth. I haven't found a thing (yet) connecting HyFlex to increased student learning, retention, completion or (gasp) faculty success.
This was a pretty cool read though, and touched on something I've heard anecdotally from so many faculty: students either don't show up to in-person class or stop showing up. They opt for online.
So again, this brings me back to one of my big questions: why not support faculty in developing and teaching awesome online courses? What's the problem you're trying to solve? What are the benefits and costs of HyFlex? Is it worth it?
"Generally, student predictions did not match their actual choices. Overall, students predicted that they would attend more face-to-face than online sessions. However, more of them decided to participate via online asynchronous modules."
And if our institutions are pushing this, I think it makes sense (and takes courage) to raise our hands and ask some tough questions. Because our time, energy, and $ are precious resources, and the stakes are higher than ever.
I guess I'm wondering what problems we're actually trying to solve here, or if we have garbage can decision making at play (solutions seeking problems).
Is the problem declining enrollments? Is the problem a lecture-based model that disengages learners? Is the problem students lacking transportation to campus? Is the problem that rigid, solely in-person models make attendance difficult for working students, parents?
I went to bed last night really angry and frustrated that people are still forcing learners to be on camera...
At this point I wonder if the holdouts are people we can get through to, who are just in need of more support and information about the science of teaching and learning, or if they are committed to their own ignorance? Is it worth continuing the conversation?
Anyway, sometimes you continue the conversation not because you believe it will change someone's mind, but because of what will happen to you if you don't keep speaking your mind, I guess.
"A lot of us have never been trained how to teach. Doesn’t it seem fundamentally absurd that graduate students and faculty all over the country are teaching science without even having taken a single course in science teaching?"
"Our current sink-or-swim approach is unkind to instructors and their students. Too many instructors approach their students as adversaries and emphasize student compliance rather than working to build relationships of mutual respect."
So we know that unmitigated chronic stress is detrimental to teaching and learning, but we can’t think our way out of it. At some point #HigherEd will have to acknowledge that we have bodies.
I've been thinking about this all morning in the context of some anxiety I've been having about transitioning into downtime over winter break...
A lot of us love our work, derive a sense of purpose from it, and yes, use it as a coping mechanism (sometimes in a healthy way, sometimes not). I have a planned 13 day break, like REAL break coming up, and that brings mixed emotions.
okay something's been bugging me...a #FacDev thread...
I would argue that #FacDev is a huge area of opportunity in #HigherEd (or we could say it's completely broken-you choose).
This is data from the first #OLCAccelerate session I attended yesterday from the neuromyths study that @BrianCDelaney, @MDMillerPHD, & Kristen Betts shared. Obviously there are concerns across the board here, but I work with faculty.