🚨 Thread🧵 🚨
On Monday, @PHSOmbudsman published their report into UK Visas and Immigration’s (UKVI) and Immigration Enforcement’s handling of the case of Rupert Everett, providing more damning evidence of the impact of the hostile environment (HE) on Black Britons. [1/18]
In short, Mr Everett had the right to be in the UK yet was told he had no status here, then threatened with deportation by Immigration Enforcement (acting through a private contractor, Capita) [3/18]
Mr Everett arrived in the UK from Jamaica as a 19-year-old in 1962, living here legally for over 50 years. However, after a trip to Jamaica in 2015, he started receiving threatening letters from Capita [4/18]
One letter from Immigration Enforcement included a threat of potential prosecution and imprisonment, and the chilling line that his ‘life in the UK will become increasingly difficult’ [5/18]
The deportation threat had a profound effect on Mr Everett, who ‘began to feel helpless and oppressed and became depressed’. This worsened when his driving licence was confiscated, reducing his freedom further. [6/18]
Mr Everett was able to find legal representation who helped compile the (heaps of) evidence he needed to overturn the removal order. This was eventually successful and his indefinite leave was accepted. [7/18]
Then, Mr Everett applied for citizenship under the Windrush scheme, only to be told he was ineligible by UKVI who asked for further evidence… Evidence he had ALREADY provided as part of the attempt to have his indefinite leave accepted 🤯 [8/18]
Honestly, we urge you to read page 8 of the report to see just how insane the hoops people are asked to go through to confirm their status (and remember Mr Everett had already provided all this proof). [9/18]
Devastatingly, Mr Everett passed away in May 2019, with the anxiety and depression caused by the HE hanging over his head, withdrawn from his family who were of course also profoundly affected.
As ever, there is a lot of horridness to unpick in this story: the incompetence and procedural mistakes of UKVI and Immigration Enforcement; the involvement of private contractors like Capita;… [11/18]
…the fact the clear evidence in Mr Everett’s passport (an indefinite leave stamp) was ignored; the presumption of illegality (e.g., that the stamp was fake); and especially the depression and anxiety Mr Everett and his family suffered. [12/18]
If it all sounds depressingly familiar, that’s because it is. The incompetence, callousness, culture of disbelief, and structural racism is emblematic of the gov't agencies and their private enforcement stooges and their policies that make up the Hostile Environment. [13/18]
Need more evidence? (You know, beyond all that we’ve tweeted about from our account for the last year?) Here’s an article on a DIFFERENT report by the PHSO, which found shocking delays in the handling of a Windrush case: theguardian.com/uk-news/2020/o…. [14/18]
Here’s a clip with Martin Forde QC (the architect of the Windrush Compensation Scheme who is increasingly distancing himself from its implementation) discussing Mr Everett’s case: channel4.com/news/barrister… [15/18]
He notes the distrust of the Home Office and its satellite agencies and the fear of deportation that is preventing people who are eligible to have their status regularised and receive compensation for the ordeal they’ve been through from coming forward. [16/18]
We ask (yet again): how can an agency that breeds that level of mistrust handle a Compensation Scheme for the people that so mistrust it? [17/18]
All power to Rupert Everett who took this fight up with UKVI, and to his daughter for continuing that fight, but they should not have had to. Yet another reason to #BreakTheHE [18/18]
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
🚨 alert,🧵 alert: National Audit Office report
The NAO has been quietly auditing the Windrush Compensation Scheme in Q1, and has reported the results of its review this am. The headline (general incompetence, undue delays) aren't surprising. NAO/1 nao.org.uk/report/investi…
We're more interested in some of the fine print, and the untruths and misrepresentations (by @ukhomeoffice, to be clear, not the NAO) the report reveals.
I'm writing this live, so follow this thread for updates as I go... NAO/2
The NAO finds the HO "developed different sets of objectives and it is not clear which it uses to measure progress". This (highlights mine) is from an internal HO document. Pay close attention to the language here:
NAO/3
This definitely feels like a planned immigration exercise - @metpoliceuk say the exercise was pursuant to “complaints”, which is nice and vague ie hard to check; of the other 5 cases mentioned, 2 are insurance offences and 3 are again unspecified. [1/2]
We are descending rapidly into ghettoisation as official policy. @ukhomeoffice and @metpoliceuk are utter poison.
PS: @Deliveroo nice work tripping over yrself to pledge allegiance to the hostile environment rather than defending your harassed workers. You’re an enabler. [2/2]
On reflection, although the HE is the work of @ukhomeoffice, we can and should do more to call out and mark corporate enablers, so I’ll start: @Deliveroo, your riders are people, not numbers to be shuffled around in support of despotic and damaging migration targets... [3/2]
Carl was born in Britain and held a British passport, which @ukhomeoffice confiscated for no apparent reason. Many journos have skirted reporting his story b/c it doesn't fit the expected Windrush narrative - but not @mrjamesob! Tune in today.
This is a companion to a piece which aired on the 6 and 10pm editions of the news on BBC1 yesterday, containing interviews of @Anthony24596 and @JacquiMckenzie6. (We're trying to figure out how to get a clip) [1/4] bbc.com/news/uk-569803…
While much of this isn't new if you've followed this issue over the past few years, the fact that new (to the general audience) victims continue to be found with each successive broadcast package is distressing, and should serve as a warning for how deep this thing goes. [2/4]
As @JacquiMckenzie6 notes in the televised piece, under 2k claims have been received. That's of an expected range of victims where the low estimate [receipts still MIA] is 12k, the original estimate was 15k, and the true number is likely *much* higher. [3/4]
As ever, there's more than one calamity to unpack here, so we'll limit ourselves to preliminary payments.
These are £10k awards that were rolled out in December to much self-congratulation as to how well @ukhomeoffice was listening to victims, how much it had achieved. [2/12]
Here comes the other shoe: when these payments were announced, @ukhomeoffice said - no equivocation - "We will ensure that [those with] pending applications will be considered for either a preliminary or final payment in the first 3 months of 2021." [3/12] gov.uk/government/new…
In January, we wrote to @pritipatel on behalf of 31 claimants, several standing in for their deceased parents, calling for the Windrush Compensation Scheme to be taken away from the Home Office on account of its comprehensive failure: [1/35] scribd.com/document/48955…
It wasn’t just that the Scheme *wasn’t working*; claimants had begun to get the sense that @ukhomeoffice was deliberately setting them up to fail, and being deliberately dishonest in its promises as to reform and meaningful change. [2/35]
On 14 Dec, @ukhomeoffice had announced a package of reforms to the Scheme. These reforms were said to be the fruit of the sincere efforts of HO staff in listening to the complaints victims and stakeholders had been making for well over a year. [3/35] gov.uk/government/new…