1. Jian Kang, a retired associate professor from New York Medical College, pointed out the following evidence supporting the Laboratory leak of the SARS-COV-2 Virus
2. The National Natural Science Foundation of China provided zero funding for the research on the origin and intermediate host of the SARS-Cov-2 virus, while the funding for research on the origin and intermediate host of the SARS-1 virus was nearly 2 million.
3. The main supporting evidence for a natural origin of SARS-COV- 2 is finding the intermediate host.
From the perspective of profit & loss, the biggest beneficiary of finding an intermediate host is China, to show that the virus comes from nature, not a man-made disaster.
4. The Chinese government should thus logically have invested a lot of manpower and material resources to strengthen scientific research to find the intermediate hosts for SARS-COV-2.
But what is the actual situation?
5. Judging from the distribution of national natural science research funds in 2020, the Chinese government's work and efforts in finding an intermediate host of the SARS-Cov-2 virus are almost....... ZERO!
6. Using the new coronavirus or SARS-Cov-2 as keywords to search the National Natural Science Foundation of China in 2020, there are 10 scientific research funds for new coronavirus-related research, but there is no project on the origin of the virus.
8. On the other hand, given that the worldwide epidemic of the original SARS virus was much smaller than this new SARS- CoV-2 virus, , the importance of the research into the origin of SARS-1 would likely have been much lower, right?
9. Let's have a look?
The National Natural Science Foundation of China is still funding at least three studies on the origin of the SARS virus:
9. A. SARS Origin Funding
Research on the source and genome characteristics of SARS virus in Guangdong, China
(2003 Lifang Jiang, 300,000, Sun Yat-sen University)
9. B. SARS Origin Funding
Identification of the receptor for the SARS virus Spike protein on the surface of the host cell
(2003 Xueliang Zhu, 350,000, Shanghai Institutes for Biological Sciences, Chinese Academy of Sciences)
9. C. SARS Origin Funding
Further research on the unnatural origin and disappearance of SARS CoV using molecular evolution and epidemiological methods
(2014 Dezhong Xu, 1 million, Fourth Military Medical University of the Chinese People's Liberation Army)
10. Jian Kang's Conclusion
The disparity between the financial support for research into the origin of SARS & SARS-COV-2 viruses reveals that top officials have long known that there is no intermediate host for SARS-COV-2 and there is no need to spend money to do useless work!
The Chinese Academy of Sciences video was discovered by researchers investigating the origin of the pandemic who call themselves DRASTIC.
Digital archivist “Jesse” @uacjess found the Chinese Academy of Sciences Video while the group's co-ordinator, who goes by a pseudonym of “Billy Bostickson” for safety reasons, has long complained evidence bats were housed in the Wuhan laboratories.
2. Let's further think of this,
Weigh what convenience both of time & means
May fit us to our shape. If this should fail,
& that our drift look through our bad performance,
'Twere better no assayed. Therefore this project
Should have a back or second that might hold
3. April 2020
Online Discussion chaired by NAM President Victor Dzau
Jeremy Farrar, Wellcome Trust
Anthony S. Fauci NIH
Sanjay Gupta, CNN
George F. Gao, DG, China CDC
Susan R. Weiss
Richard J. Hatchett
Coalition for Epidemic Preparedness Innovations
1. Wuhan Institute of Virology and REMDESIVIR
(Patent and Paper)
Second analysis by Jian Kang, New York Medical College Associate Professor @jkssdk0907
The first analysis was posted yesterday here:
The National Natural Science Foundation of China
2. On February 4, 2020, the Wuhan Institute of Virology announced on its official website whiov.cas.cn/kyjz_105338/20… (now deleted) that on January 21, 2020, it had declared a Chinese invention patent on the "use of anti-2019 novel coronavirus" Remdesivir. archive.ph/88ecC
3. The experimental data that the application relied on was sent to Cell Research on January 25, 2020, and published as a Letter to the Editor on February 4th 2020 in the journal, Nature. (nature.com/articles/s4142…)
2. via @ydeigin and @franciscodeasis
it’s a very disturbing paper if its findings are verified: not only SARS2 and RaTG13 have signs of genetic manipulation in yeast but SARS1 too.
WIV is known to have eyed yeast reverse genetic systems with interest (see attached WIV thesis
3. The Author has published quite a few interesting papers with 1870 citations. scholar.google.com/citations?user…
One on the Association between influenza vaccination rates and SARS-CoV-2 outbreak infection rates in OECD countries papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cf…
It's Fun Time with Yeast DNA! New paper!
Differential enrichment of yeast DNA in SARS-CoV-2 and related genomes supports synthetic origin hypothesis
46 Pages, Posted: Andreas Martin Lisewski
Jacobs University, June 5, 2021 papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cf…
I will be reading this now
3. The "secret handshake" club
Michael Callahan was in Nanjing in December 2019 and would know more about Agency funding via "United Therapeutics"
Daszak dealt more with DTRA, DARPA & DOD via Jonathan Epstein & Bill Karesh for US virus collection project.