Earlier, I shared my own little "blogger makes good" story about how the Better Posters blog became a book.

Pfft. 🥱 You want a REAL "blogger makes good" story?

@edyong209 won one of the @PulitzerPrizes today for #SciComm! 🎉
🧵 1/13
Ed Yong cut his #SciComm teeth with his acclaimed blog Not Exactly Rocket Science. 🚫🚀🧪

He got real good REAL fast.

Scientists AND journalists quickly recognized that he was one of the best science writers working in the blog format. 2/13
Several of Ed's blog posts appeared in The Open Laboratory anthology of best science blogging.

I can't remember how many times his work was featured. It was many. 3/13 "The Best Science Writing Online 2012" book cover.
The Not Exactly Rocket Science blog took a meandering path over its run.

It started at Wordpress in 2006 with DOZENS of readers... 4/13
Then the blog moved to ScienceBlogs (an influential network for a while)

then to Discover magazine (ooh, established national magazine)

then to National Geographic (one world's most ICONIC magazine brands). 5/13
Ed wrote Not Exactly Rocket Science for 10 years and racked up over 1,800 posts.

He also started writing projects for little places like @SciAm, @newscientist, and @nature.

And he wrote a book 📖, I Contain Multitudes.

You know, regular stuff. 😉 6/13 Book "I Contain Multitides" on shelf.
Ed only folded the Not Exactly Rocket Science blog when he started working full time for @TheAtlantic.

His last post is here nationalgeographic.com/science/articl… (may be paywalled). 7/13
Some of Ed's pieces before COVID-19 seemed downright prophetic. Like, Pythia, Oracle of Delphi level prophetic.

This piece in 2018 asked all the right questions. It's like, "He tried to warn us all." theatlantic.com/magazine/archi… 8/13
Ed's #SciComm biology blogging, and his book on microbes 🦠, served him in good stead when COVID-19 hit.

He had the knowledge and skills to put the pandemic in perspective in a way few could. 9/13
Ed's #SciComm writing is remarkable not only for its technical accuracy and insights, but because his pieces are so often infused with great EMPATHY.

For scientists. For readers. For people caught up in moments bigger than them.

His words have homour, warmth, and care. 10/13
I feel lucky 🍀 that I happen to be in charge of the @iamscicomm account as this year's @pulitzerprizes are announced.

I know Ed a little through the blogging and the science online community. I could not be happier for this win 🥇 for him. 11/13
The joke is that there are only two prizes 🏆 that count: he Pulitzer and the Nobel.

Having bagged one, I wouldn't count him out of the running for the other just yet. 12/13
It only remains for me to say:

Congratulations, @edyong209! 🎉

I'd wish you success in your next steps, but this somehow seems redundant at this point. 13/13

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with IAmSciComm

IAmSciComm Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @iamscicomm

13 Jun
I'm supposed to wind up my threads today!

I want to try to articulate ideas that have been running around in my head this week about

how often we treat good #SciComm as an individual problem

instead of a systemic problem. 🧵 1/15
I just released a book that mostly focuses on helping scientists - particularly early career researchers - be better communicators using the poster medium.

I think that's a pretty classic #SciComm concern. "Here's help with your skills!" 2/15
In retrospect, I'm glad I wrote a section for conference organizers.

Earlier this week, I live tweeted a webinar that reminded us how many design (and communication) decisions are made by a few people with power.

Like conference organizers. 3/15
Read 15 tweets
12 Jun
I don't get why people flip out over circular bar graphs ⚪📊. #SciComm #DataVisualization 🧵 1/5 Vaccination coverage in Can...
If you believe the circular bar chart is good, why put the same data in a table, too?

Why not just have the "second dose" 💉💉 data in the table?

Or make another circular bar chart ⚪📊 for the second dose data? 2/5 Vaccination coverage in Can...
The colour scheme seems completely arbitrary. Different colours represent anywhere from a 1% difference in "first dose" 💉 percentages (people in their 70s vs. people 80 and older) to a 16% difference (people 18-29 vs. younger teens). 3/5 Vaccination coverage in Can...
Read 6 tweets
12 Jun
On my workout this morning, I heard my instructor talk about yawning 🥱 and saying it was because "brain 🧠 needs oxygen".

My understanding is that best current hypothesis is that yawning cools 🥶 the brain. E.g., frontiersin.org/articles/10.33… 1/4
Nuance alert! Yawning 🥱 could be multifunctional, and have physiological and social roles that influence its frequency. 2/4
This reminded me that Wiki has a list of common misconceptions (though yawning isn't on it): en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_c… I think every time I go through it I learn at least one 1️⃣ new thing! 3/4
Read 4 tweets
11 Jun
Today's @NShortwave episode addresses a common problem in #SciComm:

Trying to match plain English with technical definitions. 🧵 1/
This episode points out that "vegetable" is, scientifically speaking, MEANINGLESS. npr.org/2021/06/10/100…

You may have gotten into arguments about whether a tomato is a fruit or a vegetable. 2/
What I did NOT know what that many things we call berries - strawberries 🍓, raspberries - are NOT berries.

You learn something new every day. 3/10
Read 10 tweets
11 Jun
Here's a second poster from @AcheleKelpfish for review!

Part of this project: mass.gov/orgs/massachus…

🧵1/10 "Coastal development t...
One of the most powerful ways that we make sense of complex documents like this is by PLACEMENT of elements.

We treat things close together as RELATED.

⭕⭕



We think the first two circles are related because they are close left to right. 2/10
But now...

⭕ ⭕


We think the two left circles are related because they are close up and down. 3/10
Read 10 tweets
11 Jun
Graphic review time!

This is one of two information posters from @AcheleKelpfish about Massachusetts Bays National Estuary Partnership: mass.gov/orgs/massachus…

🧵 1/14 "Welcome to MassBays' ...
From the title and shape, I am guessing that this is meant to be one of those graphics that stand alongside trails as people walk around. 🚶‍♀️🚶‍♂️

This means most people are there for the scenery and not the information, so it could be a TOUGH crowd to reach! 2/14 Image
With a big, wide, poster like this, people are probably going to just glance at it first.

What attracts their attention first? Is it a good entry point? 3/14 "Welcome to MassBays' ...
Read 14 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Too expensive? Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal Become our Patreon

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us on Twitter!

:(