What is the legal difference between EU pre-Settled Status and Settled Status, in terms of employment rights ? None
However, In practice, many employers think it means half rights. If we apply for a full time permanent job, some employers will change it to a full time
temp job, or refuse to take us on until we get the complete settled status.These unlawfully practices impact on EEA now, but it could have been prevented cos non-EEA& EEA from BAME background have been going through similar experience since 1994. It became worse in 2008(picture)
Art 18 of withdrawal,gov must issue a certificate of application 4the residence status,if we have the right to commence residence after the end of the transition period.This protect our statutory right to work. Non Regression clause in the EU/UK FTA protects our rights at work.
If we have made an application which has not been finally determined by 30june, our temp right to work remains valid and our rights at work stay the same because they are saved. Unfortunately, Home Office tells employers the CoA is not an acceptable document. Again, a deja vue,
Non EEA have been experience this problem since before many of us at Migrants At Work were even born. We wish someone had listening between 2009-2020, and listen now to learn from our lived experience.
The new #right2workchecks rules will shaft EEA into #homegrownslavery. Can some MP's dig their head out of the sand and speak to us to learn something. Why is so difficult to learn from our lived experience and expertise so that EEA do not suffer?
We have the solutions to the challenges EEA will experience on and after 1july 2021 in the labour market.
We are handing out leaflets and explaining to EEA and family members that once they have applied to the EUSS , our rights are protected. In reality, only the right to residence is protect in law and in practice. The economic rights are protected in law, but not practice.