For a little more than a year, the proponents of this destructive ideology have been rebranding it “diversity training,” and when conservatives called bullshit and somewhat successfully started identifying it in pedagogy and policy, the new line is they don’t know what it is.
Ofc someone asked me to explain it, and so I did. It’s not a very difficult concept to summarize.
We don’t need to be teaching black children they are born into a machine hellbent on their destruction and white children their skin color makes them morally inferior. This should be obvious, but for some reason, ppl in media keep referring to this crap as “diversity training.”
This is a good point, and it makes sense considering CRT’s intellectual roots.
Any resistance is simply a failure to understand or execute correctly.
The absurdity of all this is that the drafters of our founding documents — based on the fundamentals of the enlightenment — KNEW that it would result in the end of slavery. They knew that it would empower people of all stripes to find justice.
One of the major reasons the (old and good) ACLU defended Nazis in Skokie was because they KNEW the First Amendment was necessary for the Civil Rights movement. (The old director said as much in an interview with Reason.)
CRT acolytes, on the other hand, know
They cannot deconstruct the current values and replace them with explicitly race-based structures if people are allowed to debate the merits of their ideas.
And so now the First Amendment is in their sights. Bill Maher basically just said it yesterday, any criticism is conflated
With white supremacy itself.
If they could repeal the First Amendment, they would, but they might not even need to if they can successfully rebrand this movement as “diversity training” and anyone against it as flat out bigoted.
Ignore them. It isn’t true. Keep fighting.
No need to “conflate.”
NHJ’s opener is obviously grounded in CRT. The idea that the country was founded to preserve slavery is itself a product of the CRT worldview, which loosely posits that the entirety of America perpetuates white supremacy.
Also, lol, that we would want “nothing” taught about slavery. It’s a gigantic block of American history, and perhaps the most influential outside of the Revolution.
Obviously the alternative is NOT to drop slavery as a subject of study. Again, pure misdirection.
Not that it will surprise anyone, but CRT in part relies on a kind of myth making.
It is flatly FALSE that “most” kids learn slavery “was not so bad.”
I’m not sure what universe Joy occupies, but it isn’t grounded in reality.
1. To demonstrate my own, as an example, the first conversation about gain of function I had was May 1, 2020. It led me down a month's long rabbit hole researching highly technical papers. Sometimes it took me a week or more to read and fully understand 10 pages.
I did not actually pitch a story on it until first week of Jan.
I would love to say I was ahead of everyone. I wasn't. We did some reporting on lab leak, but we didn't get really aggressive on it until recently.
A lot of that is my fault. I was trepidatious.
I didn't fully understand. My assumptions about how the research worked turned out to be true, but I didn't truly understand.
Sure as shit didn't help matters that NO ONE in the field was willing to talk about it. One or two, I understand, but dozens of emails going unanswered.
Reading the Vanity Fair story and a bunch of things jump out at me just concerning the mythology of early 2020.
Many in establishment and corporate media have been blaming Trump for their own efforts to suppress lab leak hypothesis.
It’s odd. It reads like TDS.
Do your fucking brains shut off when Trump talks? Does the sound of his voice negate all ability to reason?
Trump’s “racism” in this case was just a reactionary response to wider media and elite institutions adopting Pro China postures and Chinese propaganda wholesale.
When every major institution is saying, you’re not allowed to say the virus came from China because it’s racist — within earshot of Chinese operatives saying the exact same thing — well obviously Donald Trump of all people is going to call it “China virus.”
1. A decent amount of people were confused about this tweet yesterday, so I’ll explain:
It’s late 2016. Obama is still in office. The IC, Democrats, and the media are fairly determined to investigate Trump criminally, to build a case based on innuendo, selective leaks, and lies.
2. The case is that Don Trump teamed up with Vlad Putin to hack Podesta and the DNC’s emails and then leak them strategically in order to win the election for Trump, all while managing to avoid the most sophisticated surveillance apparatus mankind has ever known. (The NSA et al)
3. I know, it’s absurd on its face. Trump is smart, but he is not a Bond villain.
In any case, as a result, Trump camp has declared war on the Deep State. His chosen horseman for that war: Mike Flynn.
Yes, it is Flynn who will protect and guide Trump as he plumbs the Deep State
The irony is that Trump probably would have lost anyway, but the fact remains, any line of inquiry remotely perceived as beneficial to Trump had to be stamped out … and anyone willing to pursue it was treated as an insane pariah AND viciously suppressed on social media.
The last part is what annoys me most. It’s not just that American media mimicked Chinese propaganda, it’s that the fact checking apparatus was eager to enforce the orthodoxy.
And it wasn’t for lack of information. Don’t let them gaslight you. Not very much info has changed.
The assault on language in the name of “inclusivity” or sensitivity is really just about making language so imprecise that regular people can no longer speak truth.
Not a mistress, but a companion. Not a riot if it’s a mostly peaceful protest. Not illegal, just undocumented.
And if you want to get really down into the guts of the matter, please take notice that every mandated change in language is not only more muddled, but it takes LONGER to even say.
If the base outcome of the change is to obfuscate and belabor language, then it seems clear that
the people enforcing the change find the subject to be either one of much personal discomfort or just plain inconvenient to their goals, usually the latter under the shrill guise of the former.
Don’t call them illegal aliens, you bigot, these words literally hurt me!