This is just the next step in a longstanding antivax strategy to portray themselves as an oppressed minority. Their misuse of the Yellow Star of David is the most egregious example of course. 1/
Antivaxxers trying to co-opt Juneteenth is a natural evolution of a strategy that started years ago and, pre-pandemic, led them to call themselves the "new civil rights movement." 2/ respectfulinsolence.com/2019/09/10/sb-…
As an aside, if the anti-Asian bigotry among antivaxxers that we've seen during the #COVID19 era is nothing new. Get a load of these images likening @DrPanMD and other Asian supporters of vaccine mandates to Chairman Mao. 3/ facebook.com/APILegCaucus/p…
Even back then, antivaxxers were aligning themselves with far right extremist groups like the California State Militia. 4/
Before they claimed to be the "new civil rights movement," antivaxxers were furiously trying to recruit Blacks to their cause, perhaps realizing how white and privileged they were. 9/
Here's a brief history of what I knew in 2019 about antivax efforts to recruit Blacks and other minorities to their conspiracy theories. 12/ respectfulinsolence.com/2019/11/12/ant…
Indeed, the entire "CDC whistleblower" conspiracy theory at the art of the antivaccine propaganda film disguised as a documentary VAXXED was that @CDCgov was "hiding" evidence that the MMR vaccine increases the risk of autism by 4-fold in Black boys. 13/ respectfulinsolence.com/2016/07/18/in-…
It's a key reason why antivaxxers have long compared school vaccine mandates to the Tuskegee syphilis experiment, a comparison that has been turbocharged since #COVID19. 14/
Given how antivaxxers have co-opted the Tuskegee syphilis experiment and the 1950s and 1960s civil rights movement to claim the mantle of an "oppressed minority" (even though they are mostly white and privileged), it should be no surprise they'd abuse Juneteenth, too. 15/15
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
Not exactly. Scientists have always conceded that #lableak was *possible.* The problem is, it was never very plausible compared to a natural origin for #SARSCoV2. It tended to be dismissed for other reasons, too.
Basically, from the very beginning, the arguments made in favor of #lableak tended to range from appeals to ignorance to risible misunderstandings of molecular biology and evolution to outright conspiracy theories. And nothing has changed. sciencebasedmedicine.org/the-origin-of-…
Zoonotic transfer has occurred many times and caused a number of pandemics. It just requires nature to be nature and do what it's always done. #lableak, OTOH, requires a massive cover-up by a vast network of scientists, civilians, and government officials. massivesci.com/articles/sars-…
Over the last month, there has been considerable chatter about the #COVID19#lableak hypothesis for the origin of #SARSCoV2, and President Biden even ordered US intelligence agencies to look into it. What, if anything, has changed? Is there new evidence? sciencebasedmedicine.org/the-origin-of-…
Spoiler alert: There's no new evidence to support #LabLeakTheory, and the arguments and evidence behind the claim that #SARSCoV2 was engineered is really weak. Bottom line: it's possible that the virus escaped from a lab, but far less likely than natural origin.
As an aside, I'm predicting that the comments section after my post will be turning into a real shitshow soon, once the #lableak trolls discover it. I apologize to our regular moderator, who will have to deal with it.
“Medical marijuana” is and has always been mostly a marketing term to lead the way to legalization for recreational use. The evidence base supporting just weed (as opposed to pharmaceutically purified cannibinoids) to treat anything has always been highly underwhelming.
And I figured that the above Tweet would piss some people off and that I might lose a bunch of followers over it. Such is life. It doesn't make the statement any less accurate. 2/
It's also amusing how some automatically assume that I think legalization of marijuana for recreational use would be a bad thing. I never said that. That's YOUR assumption. I've supported legalization for a number of years now. 3/
I'm not surprised that @raoult_didier has resorted to the coward's way of responding to scientific criticism. After using his fame and social media influence to harass @MicrobiomDigest, he's now resorting to legal thuggery, just as quacks always do. 1/ theguardian.com/science/2021/m…
I'm definitely going to sign this open letter in defense of @MicrobiomDigest. All scientists who object to quacks and bullies trying to use legal and social media thuggery to silence critics should. 2/ osf.io/2awsv/
You can find a link to sign this open letter and help @MicrobiomDigest stand up to @raoult_didier. His science is so bad that he can't answer criticism the way scientists normally do; so he's now using bullying tactics. 3/3
It's truly depressing to me that there are journalists who, months after #CovidVaccine was released, there are still reporters who write stories that assume that a death after the vaccine was caused by the vaccine. @PatchTweet, do better. patch.com/michigan/plymo…
Any death is tragic, but writing a story like this before medical authorities investigate is basically fodder for antivaxxers.